On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should >> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates >> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback >> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package >> maintainers directly. Its not like providing positive or negative >> karma will make any changes to already pushed package to updates >> repository. > > I do have valid use cases. We've had examples of important packages having > been pushed stable too quickly and breaking some computers (think kernel, > mesa). The bodhi comments can then be used to provide a description of the > problem, suggest any workarounds or fixes, and also link to more information > e.g. in the bugzilla or common bugs wiki, etc. The Bodhi pages are easy to > find (if I perform a system update and the computer breaks, I look at what > was included in the last update, and look at any bodhi feedback for those > packages), so it makes perfect sense to inform people there. It's much harder > to search bugzilla to find issues with a particular package. >
Well, IMHO for description of the problem and fixes Bugzilla is the right place. It's a bug in a stable package then, no testing feedback anymore. Greetings, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
