-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:37:44 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:09:03PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Without spinning the wheel of blame -- at Flock, we talked about
> > > slowing down the crazy train a little bit, probably no
在 2013-8-21 PM1:28，"Tomasz Torcz" 写道：
> Also on related note: vblade package (the AoE server) was on
> recent orphans list. If it's not taken, the other half of aoe stack
> will disappear from Fedora.
Damn... it's deprecated now. Can Dennis unretire it?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
Hi.
I have updated libzip to 0.11.1 in rawhide.
Despite there is no soname change, see:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libzip.html
So I think it is preferable to rebuild dependent packages to ensure all
is ok.
As PHP only work with libzip 0.10 (use lot of private stuff), the zip
extensio
Dne 20.8.2013 20:28, Frankie Onuonga napsal(a):
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:35:54PM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
> I am hoping to assist in packaging if required.
what are you interested in? Anything specific? Languages?
I would like
On 20 August 2013 19:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Each approved spin MUST have at least 1 person fill in a basic spin
> test matrix for at least 1 TC or RC in order to be shipped with Alpha.
>
> If the image fails or there are no test results maintainers can try
> again at the next milestone, but the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:37:44 -0400
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:09:03PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > > Without spinning the wheel of blame -- at Flock, we talke
On 21 Aug 2013 08:13, "Dennis Gilmore" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:37:44 -0400
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:09:03PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > Without spinning the wheel of blame -- at Flock, we talked abo
On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> With the branch for F-20 just complete it makes it the perfect time to begin
> the change of process for F-21 then so let's keep the discussion going of
> what we should be doing now as F-21 is officially open for business...
> Otherwise we
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> What are the options? Push 21 back 3 months, and then 8 month instead of 6
> month intervals?
May be pushing 21 for whole 6 months, which will give enough time to
concentrate to the existing issues. Another option can be with keeping
same
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:57:38 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I have openssl and fipscheck obsoletes on the list.
>
> They were added because the base openssl (and fipscheck) package was
> split into openssl-libs and openssl subpackages where only the
> openssl-libs is needed unless something requires
Le 21/08/2013 09:38, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> I have updated libzip to 0.11.1 in rawhide.
And in F20 branched too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež
wrote:
> I'll fill a bug against plplot.
By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line --
without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of
them should be moved to Libs.private to avoid unnecessary linkage
bloat
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
What's the full story here?
php-gettext
php-gettext-0:1.0.11-5.fc20.noarch isn't obsoleted
php-gettext-0:1.0.11-4.fc19.noarch isn't obsoleted
php-gettext-0:1.0.11-3.fc18.noarch isn't obsoleted
php-gettext-0:1.0.9-3.fc15.noarch is oldest
php-gettext < 0:1.0.11-3 obsoleted b
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:47:31PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> I need to update the documentation. But we need to get to the point
> >> where the releng side is transparent and just happens. The crazy
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>>
>> What are the options? Push 21 back 3 months, and then 8 month instead of 6
>> month intervals?
>
> May be pushing 21 for whole 6 months, which will give enough time to
> concentrate
The "Obsoletes" tag for these python-django-foo renames is not high
enough. A systematical error due to not considering the dist tag.
django-extra-form-fields
django-extra-form-fields-0:0.0.1-2.fc17.noarch isn't obsoleted
django-extra-form-fields-0:0.0.1-1.fc16.noarch is oldest
djan
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What are the options? Push 21 back 3 months, and then 8 month instead of 6
> >> month intervals?
> >
> > May be pushing 21 for whole 6 mont
Hello, I'm adding a SELinux module to the gogoc package, as seen in this
draft [1], and I've received a error about the dependecies. In my spec
file I use this to extract the selinux-policy version and use it as a
dependency:
%global selinux_policyver %(%{__sed} -e
's,.*selinux-policy-\\([^/]
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Murphy
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> What are the options? Push 21 back 3 months, and then 8 month instead of
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:37:44 -0400
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:09:03PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > > Without spinning the wheel of blame -- at Flock, we talke
#443: Update repoinfo.conf - Add branch
+-
Reporter: ausil | Owner:
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: critical| Milestone: 0.9.0
Component: production | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Blocked
Hi,
I just updated my rawhide machine and it stopped booting. I end up in "grub
rescue>" prompt, stating that there is no '/grub2/i386-pc/normal.mod'.
grub rescue> ls /grub2
./ ../ themes/ grub.cfg
grub rescue> set
prefix=(hd0,msdos1)/grub2
root=hd0,msdos1
Partition seems to be right, why "msdo
On 21/08/13 12:21, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
Hello, I'm adding a SELinux module to the gogoc package, as seen in this
draft [1], and I've received a error about the dependecies. In my spec
file I use this to extract the selinux-policy version and use it as a
dependency:
%global selinux_policyver
El 2013-08-21 11:49, Paul Howarth escribió:
On 21/08/13 12:21, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
Hello, I'm adding a SELinux module to the gogoc package, as seen in
this
draft [1], and I've received a error about the dependecies. In my spec
file I use this to extract the selinux-policy version and use i
Le 21/08/2013 09:38, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> I have updated libzip to 0.11.1 in rawhide.
>
> Despite there is no soname change, see:
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libzip.html
>
> So I think it is preferable to rebuild dependent packages to ensure all
> is ok.
Build done, f20 an
On 08/21/2013 02:00 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
El 2013-08-21 11:49, Paul Howarth escribió:
On 21/08/13 12:21, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
Hello, I'm adding a SELinux module to the gogoc package, as seen in this
draft [1], and I've received a error about the dependecies. In my spec
file I use thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:37:10 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Dennis Gilmore
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:37:44 -0400
> > Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >> On T
On 08/21/2013 01:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my rawhide machine and it stopped booting. I end up in "grub
> rescue>" prompt, stating that there is no '/grub2/i386-pc/normal.mod'.
>
> grub rescue> ls /grub2
> ./ ../ themes/ grub.cfg
>
> grub rescue> set
> prefix=(hd0,msdos1
The lightweight tag 'perl-AnyEvent-7.05-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
c3b9734... Update to 7.05
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-AnyEvent-7.05-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
c3b9734... Update to 7.05
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On 08/21/2013 03:06 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:37:10 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
As far as I know, we've done a mass rebuild and we've branched. FESCo
has closed the Changes. Beyond that, I don't know what else has
actually s
On 25 July 2013 12:44, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> Change is accepted under the condition that the conflicts with
> libreoffice must be worked out. openoffice and libreoffice packagers
> get to work them out. There is no Fesco mandate that libreoffice
> must change to accomodate openoffice at this
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Peek:
2db6a9296df3f778282ca3dcd9d79e9a Data-Peek-0.39.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
commit 751218150ad38797f1e953e8770dfe361c410569
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Aug 21 15:56:42 2013 +0200
0.39 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 08/21/2013 03:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
there are no f20 mock configurations on released Fedora releases in place
Is fedpkg mock-config problematic? Either vanilla or after editing from
baseurl=http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//repos/f20-build/315000/x86_64
to
baseurl=http://kojipkgs.f
Hi,
As serf upstream has released 1.3 and 1.3.1 bugfix for a long time, I'm
going to push an update in the next week. Upstream had changed to scon so
there needs some work.
Serf is the default client library of Subversion and Apache OpenOffice.
Subversion has been built with serf support for a wh
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:39 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 20.8.2013 20:28, Frankie Onuonga napsal(a):
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:35:54PM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
> > I am hoping to assist in packaging if required.
commit 80dd9c87d3a7acedef34f951fb5b999d42d1
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Aug 21 15:58:03 2013 +0200
0.39 bump
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6d2d51b..10b0412 100644
--- a/
On 08/21/2013 04:01 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
On 08/21/2013 03:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
there are no f20 mock configurations on released Fedora releases in place
Is fedpkg mock-config problematic?
No. fedpkg mockbuild for f20 and mock -r fedora-20-XXX are the problem.
Ralf
--
dev
On 08/21/2013 04:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:01 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
On 08/21/2013 03:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
there are no f20 mock configurations on released Fedora releases in
place
Is fedpkg mock-config problematic?
No. fedpkg mockbuild for f20 and mock -
Le Dim 4 août 2013 10:44, Till Maas a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:54:38PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le Mar 23 juillet 2013 19:26, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
>
>> > AFAICS it shouldn't be too hard to script up something so this would
>> > as easy as `fixfontmd --copyright "$(he
Le Mar 6 août 2013 23:48, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> There's already some example instructions on how to use ttname here,
> which accurately reflects the CLI interface as it is now implemented:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Patches/ttname
also please keep the fonts list in CC when di
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:49:04PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 21/08/13 12:21, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> >Hello, I'm adding a SELinux module to the gogoc package, as seen in this
> >draft [1], and I've received a error about the dependecies. In my spec
> >file I use this to extract the selinux
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:35:57 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Just one minor item:
> How do you expect people to test f20 fixes at the moment?
>
> There is no f20 repo on dl.fedoraproject.org, there are no f20 mock
> configurations on released Fedora releases in place, mirrormanager
> also so do
IMHO, I'd prefer to do f20 as we have planned with the tight schedule,
then after the holidays look at the proposals for fedora.next and base
Fedora 21 on that.
If we do much of the fedora.next setup it's going to require a lot of
retooling and setup (just how much we can ask each team after we h
On 08/21/2013 05:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:35:57 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just one minor item:
How do you expect people to test f20 fixes at the moment?
There is no f20 repo on dl.fedoraproject.org, there are no f20 mock
configurations on released Fedora releases
On 08/21/2013 04:39 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:01 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
On 08/21/2013 03:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
there are no f20 mock configurations on released Fedora releases in
place
Is fedpkg mock-config
Please see bottom-post Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the TELUS network
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:21:11PM -0700, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
>Way off topic, so much so that I considered emailing Matthew off list: how
>do you get the cloud-graphics in your signature?
The magic power of Unicode.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
Am 21.08.2013 14:10, schrieb Remi Collet:
> Le 21/08/2013 09:38, Remi Collet a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have updated libzip to 0.11.1 in rawhide.
>>
>> Despite there is no soname change, see:
>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libzip.html
>>
>> So I think it is preferable to rebuild dependent
commit fc54ae30401a91a7dc75b3a8657d8dc54e883171
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Aug 21 17:50:31 2013 +0200
2.52 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997833
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
CC|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21/08/2013 14:44, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> drop zip extension? why?
- From my initial message:
> As PHP only work with libzip 0.10 (use lot of private stuff), the
> zip extension is become unmaintainable, so have been dropped from
> php.
>
> So
El Miércoles, 21 de agosto de 2013 16:03:23 Richard W.M. Jones escribió:
> Just open a bug against selinux-policy and ask the maintainer
> to drop a file somewhere which contains the version number, eg:
>
> %install
> echo '%{version}' > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/selinux/version
>
> We do so
commit 59e130e48fa1f6f6cb21f7c6f221799d2622ea2c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Aug 21 18:02:21 2013 +0200
2.52 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.git
Hi guys,
there has been some demand for some time to make more strict line
between mariadb and mysql in Fedora. I've tried to summarize some steps
we'd like to apply for F20 in order to decrease that confusing -- see
bug #999589 and feel free to comment here or there (it seemed to me that
bug
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.f
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-ParseUtil-Domai
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.1
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc1
perl-Jemplate has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires p
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
O
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires
libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
On armhfp:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl req
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COM
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
per
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libperl.so()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Qt
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On armhfp:
per
perl-Template-Alloy has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Template-Alloy-1.016-6.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Template-Alloy-1.016-6.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Template-Alloy-1.01
perl-CGI-Ex has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Ex-2.38-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Ex-2.38-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-CGI-Ex-2.38-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:45:59 +0100
Ian Malone wrote:
> On 20 August 2013 19:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Each approved spin MUST have at least 1 person fill in a basic spin
> > test matrix for at least 1 TC or RC in order to be shipped with
> > Alpha.
> >
> > If the image fails or there are no
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> = New business =
>
>
Jaroslav notice that there's one more Fedora 20 Change that hasn't been
approved:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC218
This one didn't get ticketed because it should be a system-wide change but
the Change
On 21 August 2013 17:11, Honza Horak wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> there has been some demand for some time to make more strict line between
> mariadb and mysql in Fedora. I've tried to summarize some steps we'd like
> to apply for F20 in order to decrease that confusing -- see bug #999589 and
> feel fre
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:52:53PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Dim 4 août 2013 10:44, Till Maas a écrit :
> > The guideline should be to ask upstream to fix the meta data. In case of
> > missing license text (e.g. source code with a GPL header but no copy of
> > the GPL itself), it is al
Good day all,
This week's status meeting has been cancelled, please join us next week
during our regular time.
In the interim send any issues you would like to discuss to the list.
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:26:38PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> 在 2013-8-21 PM1:28，"Tomasz Torcz" 写道：
> > Also on related note: vblade package (the AoE server) was on
> > recent orphans list. If it's not taken, the other half of aoe stack
> > will disappear from Fedora.
>
> Damn... it's dep
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide where a bit
dated due to the changes in croup I decided to have a look at th
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
d21df9c... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
d21df9c... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
d21df9c... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
d21df9c... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999631
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999631
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Metadata-1.15-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail becau
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-08-22 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-08-22 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-08-22 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-08-22 1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> Now for those that are not familiar with our default using the short fqdn it
> cuts the fqdn at the highest level domain as in the first "dot" so in the
> sample case the login and command line promt is shown as "container01".
>
>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:39:40 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.08.2013 16:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:20:33 +0200
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> because it happens *regulary* and not from time to time
> >> and not depending on package/maintainer and that is
> >> a wr
On 08/21/2013 08:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
Now for those that are not familiar with our default using the short fqdn it
cuts the fqdn at the highest level domain as in the first "dot" so in the
sample case the login and command
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> When the switch was first proposed it was Oracle who was most vocal against
> it to the point of them stating they'd take over package ownership and
> filing #958131 to update to 5.6 and change the name from community-mysql to
> mysql-commu
Once upon a time, Ken Dreyer said:
> I fear a similar fate is going to befall mysql-workbench before too
> long, since it's been orphaned for a while. Are the Oracle employees
> still around?
I looked a while back, and it is marked "deprecated" in the Fedora
package database. I'm not sure why it
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Greetings all
>
> After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
> mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
> to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide wh
On 22 Aug 2013 01:01, "Chris Adams" wrote:
> I looked a while back, and it is marked "deprecated" in the Fedora
> package database. I'm not sure why it wasn't just orphaned, since AFAIK
> it still works, still maintained, and there's no direct replacement.
Maybe it was deprecated due to a new m
Le 22/08/2013 02:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
> it still works
Really ?
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=ON_QA&component=mysql-workbench&list_id=1639090
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
95 matches
Mail list logo
