On 25 July 2013 12:44, Jaroslav Reznik <jrez...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Change is accepted under the condition that the conflicts with > libreoffice must be worked out. openoffice and libreoffice packagers > get to work them out. There is no Fesco mandate that libreoffice > must change to accomodate openoffice at this time. alternatives > is not the way to resolve the conflicts but environment-modules > may be looked at as a similar means to achieve that. > > mattdm wants this to be perfectly clear: FESCo does not grant > automatic exceptions to our processes on any basis. > > Once again branch has been reached without so much as a package review request with a sample spec file...
Can this farce please be ended and this 'self contained change' which is only there as a 'change' for PR by AOO be dropped and the proper channels for a new package be followed?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
