On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:49:31AM -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > I suspect you are using SSSD to handle LDAP logins. This was broken in
> > rawhide yesterday because I pushed a new version of libldb that
> > apparently broke ABI w
On 02/28/2011 08:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:03:02 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>>
Btw, I think the GNOME 3 roll-out in Fedora should be "all or nothing",
that means, no *competing* fallback mode that tries
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 04:15:38 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What
> > about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we
> > make things like virt-manager just work in *every* envir
Larry Vaden writes:
>>From a recent default install of F14:
>
> ps auxw | wc -l
> 124
How many of those are kernel threads?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
--
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 02/27/2011 06:36 PM, drago01 wrote:
> I used to be able to hover my mouse over the time and at least it would
> tell me the date instead of having to click on it just to see it.
I think the general problem here is
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:20 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:30:43PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Were you thinking of just /var/log/messages? or all log files?
> > Or all syslog written files? or ?
> >
> > If you are talking all log files, I would suggest making this into
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:46 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 08:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:03:02 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> >>
> Btw, I think the GNOME 3 roll-out in Fedora should be "all or
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:06 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 16:20 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > On 02/27/2011 03:55 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > >
> > > When in a program (Evolution for example), it seems this is the only one
> > > I see in the task window/panel or wh
On 02/28/2011 01:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> These are all rather 'GNOME 3 impressions' than 'F15 Alpha impressions'.
> It's probably going to help more to raise them on GNOME mailing lists,
> or the Fedora desktop mailing list.
Mangled Billy Shakespeare aside ...
This is a very valid poi
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:13:44PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:21:30PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > No, but it does mean that what you're proposing would involve adding
> > functionality to Anaconda. The current situation is that the services
> > that are started whe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680893
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Larry Vaden writes:
>
>>>From a recent default install of F14:
>>
>> ps auxw | wc -l
>> 124
>
> How many of those are kernel threads?
I dunno but if you will suggest a mod to the CLI command I'll run it
and report back.
regards/va...@texo
On 02/28/2011 07:32 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> This is a very valid point - the trail of complaints are largely gnome
> issues (design, bugs whatever)
>
> What should we fedorans be discussing then ?
There are a number of other changes in Fedora and many of them directly
related to Fedora inte
Greetings everyone!
Remember that tomorrow we will host a Localization and
Internationalization Installation Test Day [1]. This test day will focus
on translations quality for Anaconda and i18n support during
installation as well as some post install verification tests.
Fell free to edit the wiki
On Friday, February 25, 2011 03:13:31 am Matthias Runge wrote:
> - change systems logs owners from root:root mode 600 to root:adm mode
> 640 (or something similar)
So, what would be the implementation of this? How would logcheck or any log
reader
work. Would they be setgid applications or would
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:37 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > This bug only seems to address the overshooting issue but not the real
> > problem of the icon moving away from you mouse pointer. If the appearing
> > label or summary notification would be considered part of the clickable
> > area for the ico
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
> Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> and be able to apply updates, etc"
>
> At least that was my thought.
>
> I wonder now if we couldn't use the critic
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said:
> > anything at all.
>
> Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What
> about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we
> make things like virt-manager just work in *every* environment?
>
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
> > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> > and be able to apply updates, etc"
> >
> > At least
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Orphaning Beagle
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
Henrique Junior (henrique...@gmail.com) said:
> Hi, just to let you know that I'm dropping Beagle. Sadly, the
> development has officialy stopped[1] for quite some time and the Gnome
> Project seems to be foccusing in Tracker.
Giv
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:37 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>
>> > This bug only seems to address the overshooting issue but not the real
>> > problem of the icon moving away from you mouse pointer. If the appearing
>> > label or summary notification
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:46:13AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, February 25, 2011 03:13:31 am Matthias Runge wrote:
> > - change systems logs owners from root:root mode 600 to root:adm mode
> > 640 (or something similar)
>
> So, what would be the implementation of this? How would logchec
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 08:26:05PM +1030, Glen Turner wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:20 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:30:43PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Were you thinking of just /var/log/messages? or all log files?
> > > Or all syslog written files? or ?
> >
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:03:26PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:13:44PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:21:30PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > No, but it does mean that what you're proposing would involve adding
> > > functionality to Anaco
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:33 -0500, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 04:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > And I'd like to counter-counter-propose that we just stop using ANY kind of
> > subvolumes or volume management by default and just default to plain old
> > partitions. IMHO, LVM caus
Hedayat Vatankhah (hedayat@gmail.com) said:
> Is it possible to depend on a group instead of a package at all?
No.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:33 -0500, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
>> On 02/23/2011 04:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> >
>> > And I'd like to counter-counter-propose that we just stop using ANY kind of
>> > subvolumes or volume management by default a
On 02/26/2011 05:33 PM, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
> This subvolume nonsense has no real place on any home computer/consumer
> device.
...
> Having more than 3 partitions on ANY system other than production
> servers seems foolish at best.
>
> To have it as default on a modern operating system is
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> The fallback mode is supposed to "mimick" the gnome-shell behaviour,
> within its limited abilities. You won't be able to move the applets, or
> fiddle around with it. Think of it as a cut-down version of the shell.
>
> If you see things
2011/2/28 J. Randall Owens :
> On 02/27/2011 07:30 PM, J. Randall Owens wrote:
>> On 02/27/2011 11:10 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This can be a hardware problem - hard to say. For some reason on one
>>> of the disks smart test is interrupted
>>>
>>> # 1 Extended offline Interru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/11 17:46, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, February 25, 2011 03:13:31 am Matthias Runge wrote:
>> - change systems logs owners from root:root mode 600 to root:adm mode
>> 640 (or something similar)
>
> So, what would be the implementation of t
Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 19:49 + schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> commit f2cb3971ffb2a53b9f0fdc536cdcc4f9c3a87876
> Author: Bill Nottingham
> Date: Fri Jan 28 16:24:54 2011 -0500
>
> Move system-config-* tools from base-x to appropriate desktops.
>
> In Admin tools, make s-c-networ
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said:
> Next time you a change like this one, please announce it to the lists
> because it has a large impact on the spins. Even better: Ask *before*
> making this change.
I did. To the list and directly to your @fedoraproject.org inbox.
HTH,
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said:
> While we are at it: I'd like to suggest that non-desktop groups like
> 'admin-tools' should be desktop-agnostic.
g-d-u is the maintained replacement for s-c-lvm. If you'd prefer to
use s-c-lvm, I'd suggest working with the upstream main
W dniu 28 lutego 2011 21:05 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
[..]
> I switched SATA and power supply cables for this disc with cables from
> disc that works fine and problem still persists. So either it's a
> hardware problem associated with this disc (I eliminated other
> hardware factors) o
Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said:
> > While we are at it: I'd like to suggest that non-desktop groups like
> > 'admin-tools' should be desktop-agnostic.
>
> g-d-u is the maintained replacement for s-c-lvm.
On 02/27/2011 07:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:23:59 +
> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to get the rationality behind why those services which
>> are permitted to be enabled by default as specific exceptions are
>> granted that exception.
> Well, I thin
Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 15:56 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said:
> > Next time you a change like this one, please announce it to the lists
> > because it has a large impact on the spins. Even better: Ask *before*
> > making this change.
>
Hi,
there is a new way to contact the board now: Recently the board's trac
instance was opened for ticket submissions by all FAS account holders.
In order to bring something to the board's attention, just file a ticket
at https://fedorahosted.org/board/newticket
You'll need to login with your FAS
Compose started at Mon Feb 28 13:15:52 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.9-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit)
40 matches
Mail list logo
