Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said: > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login > and be able to apply updates, etc" > > At least that was my thought. > > I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define > these. > > Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by > default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"
It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a little weird. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
