On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said: > > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are > > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login > > and be able to apply updates, etc" > > > > At least that was my thought. > > > > I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define > > these. > > > > Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by > > default. If it is, it _may_ start by default" > > It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a > little weird.
well, the arbiter of what's critpath is supposed to be the critpath policy, not comps. Comps is just how the policy is implemented. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
