>
> Perhaps a 'dnf-is-dnf5' providing the dnf command as a symlink to dnf5
> (taking inspiration from debian's python-is-python3) would work as a
> stop-gap, so people who want a system with just dnf could install that
> package as an alternate dnf provider ?
>
Rather than a `dnf-is-dnf5` package,
Vít Ondruch wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200:
> > I think only the mass-prebuild maintainer can help you there. dnf5
> > cannot be set to provide dnf, because it...doesn't.
>
>
> I know and yet again, I have not find any issues using mass-prebuild with
> DNF5 and until now, it worke
V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ond
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf
> > > > Updating and loading rep
V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf
> > > Updating and loading repositories:
> > > Repositories loaded.
> > > Failed to resolve th
Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Can you please make this work?
~~~
$ sudo dnf update -x dnf
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: package mass-prebuild-1.1.
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Can you please make this work?
>
>
> ~~~
>
> $ sudo dnf update -x dnf
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem 1: package mass-prebuild-1.1.0-1.fc39.noarch requires dnf, but
Can you please make this work?
~~~
$ sudo dnf update -x dnf
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: package mass-prebuild-1.1.0-1.fc39.noarch requires dnf, but
none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both dnf5-5.1.
On 8/8/23 03:59, Nicola Sella wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed[1] DNF will not be obsoleted in fedora 39. The side-tag
with the reverted changes was merged[2,3] just now.
You can now try the new packages by upgrading to the newer version of
DNF5 (dnf5-5.1.1-1.fc39) which will not obsolete DNF (dnf-4-
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 15:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 19:59 +0200, Nicola Sella wrote:
> >
> > 2. If you would rather not use the side-tag OR you are updating after the
> > packages are available in rawhide, you should have no issues. The same two
> > options follow:
>
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 19:59 +0200, Nicola Sella wrote:
>
> 2. If you would rather not use the side-tag OR you are updating after the
> packages are available in rawhide, you should have no issues. The same two
> options follow:
The update will not land in Rawhide as-is because the removal of any
Hi all,
As discussed[1] DNF will not be obsoleted in fedora 39. The side-tag with
the reverted changes was merged[2,3] just now.
You can now try the new packages by upgrading to the newer version of DNF5 (
dnf5-5.1.1-1.fc39) which will not obsolete DNF (dnf-4-16.2-2.fc39) anymore.
Note that, if y
12 matches
Mail list logo
