Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: >> > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla: >> >>> Also I think that with >> >>> wordpress 3 the separate w

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Yeah, I forgot that bit. Adrian(CCd), if you like, orphan > both wordpress and wordpress-mu, and I'll take over. If I do, I plan to > update wordpress to 3.0.1 and EOL wordpress-mu. > >>> I orphaned it for EL-5 and E

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Also I think that with >> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >> into mainline. So wouldn't it be

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Also I think that with > wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged > into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? > W

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (???) wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla > wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/3 Jon Cieslamailto:l...@jcomserv.net>>: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wo

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? >>> >>> Well, yes, probably. That might even help with th

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla: > >>> Also I think that with > >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged > >>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3?

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? >>> >> >> Well, yes, probably. That might even help with the

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla : >> Also I think that with >> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? >> > > > Well, yes, probably.  That might even help with the bundled library > situation.  But that's an is

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>  In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on >> bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds.  If someone >> familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to >> make sure the changes don'

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >  In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on > bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds.  If someone > familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to > make sure the changes don't break a