On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla <l...@jcomserv.net> wrote:

>  On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla<l...@jcomserv.net>:
> >>> Also I think that with
> >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
> >>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, yes, probably.  That might even help with the bundled library
> >> situation.  But that's an issue for the maintainer.  I could help with
> that
> >> too, if needed.
> >>
> > The wordpress owner said " if someone with lots of PHP knowledge wants
> > to take it I would
> >> be happy if it keeps getting maintained." in the last reply in fedora
> devel list. I think it will much much if we can update wordpress to 3.x. 2.8
> branch is pretty old, and few people want to test it(2.9 is very mature now
> and 3.0 is also released a while ago).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chen Lei
> <facepalm> Yeah, I forgot that bit.  Adrian(CCd), if you like, orphan
> both wordpress and wordpress-mu, and I'll take over.  If I do, I plan to
> update wordpress to 3.0.1 and EOL wordpress-mu.
>
> Looking for a few seconds at 3.0.1, it looks like there are still quite
> a few things bundled, but at least there will be a greater chance of
> compatibility with the system versions.  I hope. <gulp>
>
> -J
>
> --
> - in your fear, speak only peace
>   in your fear, seek only love
>
> -d. bowie
>
>
WordPress comes bundled with TinyMCE, right? Has anyone worked on separating
out TinyMCE and packaging it separately? I know there are a lot of web apps
that use it...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to