On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:00:55PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > […]
>
> > The purpose here is to make the Fedora project a more welcoming place to
> > people who _do_ find those terms unwelcome. That doesn't mean everyone
> > does. It means we want to be welcoming and
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> […]
> The purpose here is to make the Fedora project a more welcoming place to
> people who _do_ find those terms unwelcome. That doesn't mean everyone
> does. It means we want to be welcoming and not jerks.
^
> I'm person
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 11:36:45AM -0600, Renich Bon Ciric wrote:
> I haven't read the whole thread but I cannot believe everybody just
> went with it.
>
> What is the practical purpose of changing master to main? I see no
> benefit whatsoever. We're only making this politicized.
>
> I haven't ch
I haven't read the whole thread but I cannot believe everybody just
went with it.
What is the practical purpose of changing master to main? I see no
benefit whatsoever. We're only making this politicized.
I haven't checked the tickets but I'd bet my left arm on us not having
a single ticket from
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Pierre - Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > This Change w
On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
== Summary ==
This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master". S
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> manually
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 10:09 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 12:26:45PM +0100, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > What's the progress on this change? Is it going to land in one
> > week? I
>
> For src.fedoraproject.org yes. It's planned for next week.
> (some pagure.io projects we control
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 12:26:45PM +0100, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> What's the progress on this change? Is it going to land in one week? I
For src.fedoraproject.org yes. It's planned for next week.
(some pagure.io projects we control should go tomorrow (Phase1))
> just want to be sure that our tooli
What's the progress on this change? Is it going to land in one week? I
just want to be sure that our tooling is ready and works with this
change since we hardcode "fedora-master" in many places.
Thanks!
Tomas
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/C
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 05:52:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Yes, it cannot encode everything but it can at least help. Is there any
> documentation about the flatpak work in Fedora? The wiki as all the
> other information that I find on Google with "flatpak Fedora" only focus
> on how to use them,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:21 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:30 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, surely
> > people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master"
>
> I disagree, my opinion is that
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:30 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons,
> surely people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master"
>
> I disagree, my opinion is that main
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:30 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, surely
> people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master"
I disagree, my opinion is that main is better than
master, and master is better than rawhide.
One shou
On 12/14/20 4:29 PM, Christopher wrote:
Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons,
surely people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master" for
our dist-git branch names for our RPMs, simply because it follows our
naming conventions and makes things easier fr
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:41:44PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves,
> > > unle
Am Montag, dem 14.12.2020 um 11:12 -0500 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:30 AM Christopher <
> ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons,
> > surely people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master"
> >
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:30 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, surely
> people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master" for our dist-git
> branch names for our RPMs, simply because it follows our naming conventions
> and
Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, surely
people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master" for our
dist-git branch names for our RPMs, simply because it follows our naming
conventions and makes things easier from that perspective. The only reason
they we
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:01:32PM -0700, stan via devel wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:09:46 -0700
> stan wrote:
> > Is this really the best use of resources to combat
> > that?
>
...snip...
>
> Just an alternative idea.
I think it's easy for people to misunderstand what we are trying to do
h
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves,
> > unless possibly you make them really long.
> >
> > flatpak_branch_where_stable_fla
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:09:46 -0700
stan wrote:
> Is this really the best use of resources to combat
> that?
What if all the money dedicated to implementing this across the tech
industry was dedicated instead to a stem scholarship fund. Students
who qualify to a stem program at a certified univer
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:28:57 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'm strongly against change master to main , just because master
> suggest that is a racist word as master/slave, is like change chess
> and play not with black and white pieces but maybe with green and
> blue . This change will deprecate a
I'm strongly against change master to main , just because master
suggest that is a racist word as master/slave, is like change chess and
play not with black and white pieces but maybe with green and blue .
This change will deprecate all I.T. books since Turing machine and it
will be just a big a me
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves,
> unless possibly you make them really long.
>
> flatpak_branch_where_stable_flatpaks_are_made_from
That it is about flatpaks is already described in the
On src.fp.o, could we inject a custom message when someone trys to
fetch/clone a master branch via pagure-dist-git ?
Something like "this branch is deprecated, more info on https://foo.bar";
20/12/11 08:15(e)an, Pierre-Yves Chibon igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:29:12AM -0800,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:29:12AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > > On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Git
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:29:12AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > This Change wil
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > default git branch
On Thursday, December 3, 2020 5:50:46 PM CET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> * COPR?
> > I'll let the COPR folks answer.
>
> Copr does not expose dist-git to users. I.e. you cannot directly upload to
> dist-git. Only via WebUI or copr-cli. So users don't even know the branch
> names. We use master bra
On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
== Summary ==
This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
manually moved and default git branch for n
Good morning,
20/12/9 23:24(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:02:45AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:27:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
> > realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
>
> Maybe we can phase it? First, provide the backwards compatible ref, see wh
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:09:44AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> Would be great if we add a deprecation notice (wich could include an EOL for
> the symbolic-ref) to git's output while operating on master branch :D
I think that would require changes on the git client end?
kevin
--
>
>
>
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:02:45AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
>
>
> 20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibo
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 04:25:53PM -0500, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
> Wouldn't "rawhide" be more consistent with the other branch names?
This has been discussed elsewhere in the thread.
I think we agreed to add a sym-ref between rawhide and main (ie, either
would work).
I can get the change updat
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:21:34PM -, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote:
> hi,
>
> I see some pagure.io project are automatically handled by this change
>
> could teams register their repositories to be migrated automatically?
> if so, what's the deadline to ask for our repositories to be included
Wouldn't "rawhide" be more consistent with the other branch names?
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
== Summary ==
This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master". Spec
hi,
I see some pagure.io project are automatically handled by this change
could teams register their repositories to be migrated automatically?
if so, what's the deadline to ask for our repositories to be included in this
change?
___
devel mailing list
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:54 AM Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šaba
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wr
Would be great if we add a deprecation notice (wich could include an EOL
for the symbolic-ref) to git's output while operating on master branch :D
20/12/3 16:53(e)an, Daniel P. Berrangé igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.or
20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
Since I don't see
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:24:26PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> > Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development
> > stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially
> > aligned with the "main" git branch name :-)
>
> But f
Wouldn't "rawhide" be the best name for most git repos, rather than "main"?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 18:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
> > realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
>
> Maybe we ca
On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
Maybe we can phase it? First, provide the backwards compatible ref, see what
breaks anyway. And only after some time, remove it?
--
Miro Hrončok
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, P
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
> >
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
> > >
> > > # By default, module stream name is derived from the br
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:39 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:24 PM DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > But fedoras aren't made of sheets of main, they're made from sheets of
> > rawhide...
>
> Actually, fedoras can be made from many different
> source materials (straw, cotton, hemp, etc
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:24 PM DJ Delorie wrote:
> But fedoras aren't made of sheets of main, they're made from sheets of
> rawhide...
Actually, fedoras can be made from many different
source materials (straw, cotton, hemp, etc.) in
addition to rawhide.
There are some workflows such that I have
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development
> stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially
> aligned with the "main" git branch name :-)
But fedoras aren't made of sheets of main, they're made from sheets of
rawhid
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
> >
> > # By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
> > If we have any "master" modules, those will get unexpectedl
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:09:01AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I always thought it could be something better like 'headwaters' or
> something. But that gets us into a big long bikeshed. :(
I thought we'd all already settled on Primordial Soup. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
>
> # By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
> If we have any "master" modules, those will get unexpectedly renamed
> as soon as they get rebuilt. This might impact tag
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:11:40AM -0500, Pavel Valena wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Till Maas"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 11:09:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fedo
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:01:04AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
> > > For all n
Dne 04. 12. 20 v 15:25 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
> +1 for "rawhide" as the branch name.
>
> I have always seen the inconsistency between "rawhide" and "master" as a
> result of "master" being a default name in git. If we are going to change it
> anyway, we should change it to the real na
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
> For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are
> changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for
> dist-git repos.
> This would make the branch name actua
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:24:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > On T
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:24:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > On Thu,
- Original Message -
> From: "Till Maas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 11:09:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 202
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:52:13PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> After looking at the infra and releng issue trackers Kevin managed to found
> back
> the ticket I was thinking about.
> You have my apologies, the namespace that was asking to a different default
> branch and for that branch to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:01 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development
> stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially
> aligned with the "main" git branch name :-)
>
> I've never felt "rawhide" was a particula
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
> > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are
> > changing t
On 12/4/20 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 04. 12. 20 v 0:43 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 12/3/20 7:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
As an alternate proposal, what is currently "master" could be moved to
"rawhide" and a_new_ "main" branch created explicity to hold just a readme
about that package'
Dne 03. 12. 20 v 23:26 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
# By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
If we have any "master" modules, those will get unexpectedly renamed
as soon as they get rebuilt. This might impact tagging or updates and
ca
Dne 04. 12. 20 v 0:43 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 12/3/20 7:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
As an alternate proposal, what is currently "master" could be moved to
"rawhide" and a_new_ "main" branch created explicity to hold just a
readme
about that package's packaging details (like which branche
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:01, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]
> pin...@pingoured.fr>
> >wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
On 12/4/20 1:21 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:21:17PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
If you don't have anything interesting to say, it could just be the
description of the package. Or other auto-generated information.
The information can be requested by machines, why would
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:21:17PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> If you don't have anything interesting to say, it could just be the
> description of the package. Or other auto-generated information.
> > The information can be requested by machines, why would a human maintain it?
> It's useful for
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:17:29AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >We'd drop in a default one and it'd be the responsibility of the maintainers
> >of the various branches.
> So except of maintain the branches, I need to maintain a README for
> my ~200 packages and keep it up to date? That's a big sho
On 12/4/20 1:01 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:43:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Who maintains this README?
We'd drop in a default one and it'd be the responsibility of the maintainers
of the various branches.
So except of maintain the branches, I need to maintain a RE
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:43:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Who maintains this README?
We'd drop in a default one and it'd be the responsibility of the maintainers
of the various branches.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing
On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
* rpkg (fedpkg)?
Wrapper to git, should not be impacted. The only thing I could t
On 12/3/20 7:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
As an alternate proposal, what is currently "master" could be moved to
"rawhide" and a_new_ "main" branch created explicity to hold just a readme
about that package's packaging details (like which branches are what
when there are module branches or other
Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
# By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
If we have any "master" modules, those will get unexpectedly renamed
as soon as they get rebuilt. This might impact tagging or updates and
cause confusion in general. We should check if ther
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://fed
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:53:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> >
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr>
>wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton <[2]bcot...@redhat.c
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
> For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are
> changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for
> dist-git repo
Dne 03. 12. 20 v 16:02 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> * Release engineering:
>
>Releng will adjust any scripts that assume 'master' branch to use
> 'main' instead. The list includes and maybe few more
I do not see in the list upstream of dist-git.
I proceeded with:
https://github.com/release-engin
On 03.12.2020 16:02, Ben Cotton wrote:
This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
use "main".
1. Why "main" and not "rawhide"?
2. W
Dne 03. 12. 20 v 16:31 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>
>> * rpkg (fedpkg)?
>
>Wrapper to git, should not be impacted.
but is impacted.
There is bunch of
if rel == 'master':
return ['master']
which needs to be updated.
Also request_repo have hard-coded "master" name.
>> * COPR?
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:39:35PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
> > >
> > > * rpkg (fedpkg)?
> >
> > Wrapper to g
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > This Cha
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:53 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > default
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> manually
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:08 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
Aligning as much as possible with what appears
to be the industry consensus ("main") makes sense
to me, as I will be able to (re)train my finger muscle
memory in the
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
> >
> > * rpkg (fedpkg)?
>
> Wrapper to git, should not be impacted. The only thing I could think of was:
> when we fe
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
>
> * rpkg (fedpkg)?
Wrapper to git, should not be impacted. The only thing I could think of was:
when we fedpkg clone an empty git repo, have fedpkg do the "git branch -M main"
di
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> >
Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
* rpkg (fedpkg)?
* koji (if no git commit is provided)?
* COPR?
* Koschei or other such services?
P
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > default gi
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> manually moved and
97 matches
Mail list logo
