Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-30 Thread Ben Beasley
will need to be addressed in the short to medium term. You may (or may not) have better luck submitting a new python-aeidon source package to support translate-toolkit, leaving the gaupol/python3-gaupol parts behind. It would still take some finesse to get this working with pyproject-rpm

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-30 Thread Sudip Shil
Hello, I took Gaupol, as it's required by translate-toolkit. just noting it here so others are aware. Sincerely, Sudip Shil On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 9:10 AM maxwell--- via devel-announce < devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Report started at 2025-04-20 22:00:03 UTC > > The following

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-29 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 7/28/25 10:36 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: nng orphan 3 weeks ago Taken, because KiCad needs it. Steve -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-29 Thread Christiano Anderson
On 29/07/2025 04:36, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: python-geojsonorphan 3 weeks ago I took this one Christiano Anderson Mastodon: https://chaos.social/@canderson https://christiano.dev -- ___ dev

Re: HEADS UP: incompatible new version of libyang in Rawhide

2025-07-29 Thread Michal Ruprich
Just bumping the thread here. I released new version of libyang (together with libnetconf2, netopeer2, sysrepo and FRR). The package that is affected by the breaking change is netopeer2-server. If you are using this package, please make sure to remove it and probably also everything under /etc

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-28 Thread Maxwell G
Hi everyone, I have some updates about the orphaned packages process. Feedback is always welcome! === IMPORTANT REMINDER === Please make sure to pay special attention to the orphaned packages report [1]. There are many more packages there than usual in part due to nonresponsive maintainer p

HEADS UP: incompatible new version of libyang in Rawhide

2025-07-18 Thread Michal Ruprich
get a new one. I tried to get around this but I did not find any solution so the only thing that one can do is to remove above packages before upgrading and installing fresh ones from Rawhide. If you have some interesting data that you'd like to keep, you can use the suggestion from [1] to c

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-07-03 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
NOTE: Packages will not be retired this week to give a grace period in light of the infra outage. I will process the retirements next week. Report started at 2025-07-03 17:00:59 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopt

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/06/2025 10:36, Cristian Le via devel wrote: Why not retire and obsolute them with the psi-plus package? I don't want to obsolete it by the psi-plus package because users won't be happy if all their accounts/messages suddenly disappear. Psi-plus has its own profiles and settings and can

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Cristian Le via devel
On 2025/06/17 9:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: I orphaned it because it's not maintained. Psi-plus is now the primary upstream from the same authors. Why not retire and obsolute them with the psi-plus package? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/06/2025 09:38, Benson Muite wrote: Ok. Orphaned. jdns is also no longer needed, since psi-plus doesn't use it anymore. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Benson Muite
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 10:32 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17/06/2025 09:10, Benson Muite wrote: >>> psi orphan, slankes 0 weeks >>> ago >> Taken > > I orphaned it because it's not maintained. Psi-plus is now the primary > upstream fro

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/06/2025 09:10, Benson Muite wrote: psi orphan, slankes 0 weeks ago Taken I orphaned it because it's not maintained. Psi-plus is now the primary upstream from the same authors. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-17 Thread Benson Muite
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 12:46 AM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > Report started at 2025-06-16 20:59:14 UTC > jdns orphan 0 weeks > ago Taken > psi orphan, slankes 0 weeks > ago Tak

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16. 06. 25 23:46, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: Depending on: levmar (3), status change: 2025-05-06 (5 weeks ago) meshlab (maintained by: churchyard, spot) meshlab-2023.12-11.fc43.src requires levmar-devel = 2.6-18.fc42 meshlab-2023.12-11.fc43.x86_64 requires

Re: New package faad2 (AAC decoding)

2025-06-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:40 AM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > "Review Request: faad2 - Library and frontend for decoding MPEG2/4 AAC" > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2370973 > > Was this reviewed by Fedora Legal (I did not see > it in the email list archives, but I might have used >

Re: New package faad2 (AAC decoding)

2025-06-16 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
"Review Request: faad2 - Library and frontend for decoding MPEG2/4 AAC" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2370973 Was this reviewed by Fedora Legal (I did not see it in the email list archives, but I might have used the wrong search criteria). Last I recall, some of the patents for

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-16 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2025-06-16 20:59:14 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Looking for sponsor for new igsc pkg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372339

2025-06-11 Thread Pavel Androniychuk
Looking for sponsor for a new pkg in fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372339 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 09:25:47AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 8:45 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce > > wrote: > > > ocaml-odocdefolos, orphan 1 > > > weeks ag

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-07 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 8:45 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > > ocaml-odocdefolos, orphan 1 weeks > > ago > > I thought this one might be used by more packages, but I think the >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > ocaml-odocdefolos, orphan 1 weeks > ago I thought this one might be used by more packages, but I think the only dependency chain is ocaml-odoc -> ocaml-sedlex -> haxe. I th

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-06 Thread Davide Cavalca
On 2025-06-06 12:52, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: bmap-toolsorphan 4 weeks ago I picked this up, planning to get it updated to the new upstream that's under Yocto. Cheers D

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-06-06 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2025-06-06 19:00:32 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 5/30/25 03:55, Sandro wrote: On 30-05-2025 10:27, Carl George wrote: FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer be added to packages. Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't know. I wish I had or that it had been pointed out when I did just that and mentioning d

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-30 Thread Sandro
On 30-05-2025 10:27, Carl George wrote: FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer be added to packages. Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't know. I wish I had or that it had been pointed out when I did just that and mentioning doing so in response to a few EPE

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-30 Thread Carl George
Indeed, I was added as a co-maintainer originally to take care of the EPEL 10 build. I'm happy to be set as the default EPEL bugzilla assignee, I just can't do it myself since only the main admin can do that. FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer be added to package

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-29 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel
On Thursday, May 22, 2025 3:55:55 PM Central Daylight Time maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > fedora-review-plugin-java orphan 1 weeks > ago > python-cerberus ngompa, orphan 2 weeks ago I've taken these. -- Robby Callic

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:56 PM wrote: > [...] > yarnpkg @epel-packagers-sig, ngompa, 2 weeks ago > orphan, smani Took this one since it's kind of critical, but co-maintainers welcome! -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-27 Thread Michel Lind
On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 15:55 -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > > Depending on: python-paginate (6), status change: 2025-05-16 (0 weeks > ago) > mkdocs-material (maintained by: @mkdocs-sig, dcavalca) > mkdocs-material-9.6.12-1.fc43.noarch requires > python3.13dist(mkd

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-05-2025 23:59, Bill Pemberton via devel wrote: ack carlwgeorge, orphan 1 weeks ago I'll take this, at least for Fedora. When I claimed it in src.fedoraproject.org it also gave me the ownership of the EPEL packages -- I don't maintain any EPEL

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-26 Thread Bill Pemberton via devel
> ack carlwgeorge, orphan 1 weeks > ago I'll take this, at least for Fedora. When I claimed it in src.fedoraproject.org it also gave me the ownership of the EPEL packages -- I don't maintain any EPEL packages anymore. -- Bill -- _

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Done, thank you! --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Friday, May 23rd, 2025 at 2:58 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hi Gwyn, > > On Fri

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hi Gwyn, On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 7:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > I took a bunch of things, I had a list but failed to save it. As always, > co-maintainers welcome. Feel free to add me (alexpl) as a co-maintainer to muParser. -- ___ devel mai

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, On 22-May-25 10:55 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > ogre dtimms, ignatenkobrain, orphan 4 weeks > ago I've taken ogre since funguloids depends on it, co-maintainers very much welcome. Regards, Hans -- __

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 5/22/25 04:55 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: po4a orphan, sharkcz 1 weeks ago I've taken this one because KiCad depends on it. It looks like a lot of other packages depend on it too. Co-maintainers are welcome. Steve -- ___

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> icon orphan 2 weeks > ago Taking this. Will try to update it to latest version over the weekend. A.FI. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Hanecak
Hello, On 5/22/25 22:55, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: miglayout hanecak, orphan 2 weeks ago I took this one. Sincerely Peter -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-22 Thread Benson Muite
python-backcall @epel-packagers-sig, @python-0 weeks ago packagers-sig, orion, orphan, salimma python-pathtools @python-packagers-sig, orphan2 weeks ago

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-22 Thread Benson Muite
> ektype-mukta-fontsorphan 2 weeks > ago > libxeddsa orphan 2 weeks > ago > poezioorphan 2 weeks > ago > python-slixmpporph

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-06 Thread Sandro
python-emoji orphan 0 weeks ago I took python-emoji. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code o

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-05-05 Thread Benson Muite
Have take XMPP related packages. Thanks to fantom for maintaining them. If you use any of them and would be interested in creating a SIG to ease maintenance, please let me know. On Mon, May 5, 2025, at 7:52 AM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > Report started at 2025-05-05 03:00:32 UTC >

New upstream and version 4.0.0 for pngcheck

2025-05-01 Thread Ben Beasley
This is just a note that the pngcheck package[1] has a new upstream[2], which has been declared official by the old upstream[3]. A new release, 4.0.0, is available. After careful examination of the changelogs[4] and source diffs, I believe it is correct to treat this as a compatible bugfix

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-04-21 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
I've taken libsoup. Comaintainers welcome. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Sunday, April 20th, 2025 at 5:51 PM, maxwell--- via devel-anno

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-04-20 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2025-04-20 22:00:03 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-04-18 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 10:12:09 AM Central Daylight Time maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > IMPORTANT NOTE: I forgot to process the orphaned packages and send the > report that was due the second week of March, so some packages have been > orphaned for more than six weeks but were not annou

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-04-09 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2025-04-10 01:00:46 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

New/Extra Git Forge Open Meeting on Wednesdays

2025-03-26 Thread Aoife Moloney
Hi folks, Just a quick fyi that there is an additional open meeting on the git forge work on Wednesdays. There are now two meetings, one at 1000 UTC and another at the current time of 1400 UTC. These are open meetings, so feel free to join them to get involved in the git forge work. They are liste

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-03-23 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
IMPORTANT NOTE: I forgot to process the orphaned packages and send the report that was due the second week of March, so some packages have been orphaned for more than six weeks but were not announced as usual. I will wait until Wednesday to retire the remaining packages orphaned for 6+ weeks. Rep

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-02-27 Thread Michel Lind
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 08:10:20AM -0800, Davide Cavalca wrote: > On 2025-02-24 17:33, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: > > simh orphan 0 > > weeks ago > > I picked this up and somewhat coaxed it into building again, but I'd be > happy to have some co-m

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-02-26 Thread Davide Cavalca
On 2025-02-24 17:33, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: simh orphan 0 weeks ago I picked this up and somewhat coaxed it into building again, but I'd be happy to have some co-maintainers if anybody's interested. Cheers Davide -- _

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-02-26 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 25 February 2025 at 02:33, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: > Report started at 2025-02-25 01:00:06 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, pleas

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2/17/25 11:47 AM, luciano s. wrote: I won't have a source for what I said right now, but likely searching for Secure Boot + TPM2 issues when dual booting will help Hope that helps, Mateus Rodrigues Costa Is it that what you mentioned ? : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-17 Thread luciano s.
> I won't have a source for what I said right now, but likely searching for > Secure Boot + TPM2 issues when dual booting will help > Hope that helps, > Mateus Rodrigues Costa Is it that what you mentioned ? : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849 --

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-17 Thread Barry
> On 17 Feb 2025, at 10:40, Frenzy Biscuit wrote: > > However, when I do not enter BIOS and just try booting normally I boot loop > consistently. In the past I have seen issues when there were uefi variables that needed removing. At the time I use the manufacture’s documented way to complete

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-17 Thread Frenzy Biscuit
Yes, the windows install exists in BIOS and yes if I manually select the entry it will boot into windows. However, when I do not enter BIOS and just try booting normally I boot loop consistently. I can confirm windows is the only entry in the bios list, fedora isn't anywhere on there. I can a

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-16 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2/16/25 5:23 PM, Frenzy Biscuit wrote: Thats what I'm doing! I'm not using a dual boot setup or GRUB. I'm installing windows directly on the hardware with no other operating system. I'm fully wiping the disk, as well. Ok, that wasn't clear. So you installed Fedora by itself on the disk,

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-16 Thread Frenzy Biscuit
Thats what I'm doing! I'm not using a dual boot setup or GRUB. I'm installing windows directly on the hardware with no other operating system. I'm fully wiping the disk, as well. My best guess at this point is I'll need to flash BIOS to reset things, but yeah :) BTW, fedora 42 is really good.

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-16 Thread Mateus Rodrigues Costa
Em dom., 16 de fev. de 2025, 20:00, Frenzy Biscuit escreveu: > Just a FYI but after installing the fedora 42 beta and then reinstalling > windows 11 I get constant boot loops. > > The only way to boot is to go into BIOS and select the boot drive manually. > > I have tried to f

Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

2025-02-16 Thread Frenzy Biscuit
Just a FYI but after installing the fedora 42 beta and then reinstalling windows 11 I get constant boot loops. The only way to boot is to go into BIOS and select the boot drive manually. I have tried to flash a new windows ISO, etc. Same issue. Prior to installing Fedora 42 everything was

Re: Seeking Fedora projects or issues that could use some new short-term contributors

2025-01-31 Thread Peter Boy Uni
Hi Adrian, > Am 31.01.2025 um 02:33 schrieb Adrian Edwards : > > Hello Fedora Devel! > > . . > Ideally I would be interested in small projects or issues within Fedora, are > approachable to people who are relatively new, and ideally have avenues for > students to get

Re: Seeking Fedora projects or issues that could use some new short-term contributors

2025-01-30 Thread Michal Schorm
heir own DE's. > > Ideally I would be interested in small projects or issues within Fedora, are > approachable to people who are relatively new, and ideally have avenues for > students to get help and learn from the team if they get stuck (in addition > to the resource I a

Seeking Fedora projects or issues that could use some new short-term contributors

2025-01-30 Thread Adrian Edwards
s within Fedora, are approachable to people who are relatively new, and ideally have avenues for students to get help and learn from the team if they get stuck (in addition to the resource I am providing in terms of office hours and other assistance for the class). Is anyone aware of particula

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:45 AM Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 21:42, maxwell--- via devel-announce > wrote: > > > > Report started at 2025-01-21 20:00:10 UTC > > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someon

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-21 Thread Ondrej Mosnáček
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 21:42, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > > Report started at 2025-01-21 20:00:10 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-15 Thread Sandro
On 15-01-2025 01:00, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: python-pep440 Adopted as it's needed by a bunch of packages I (co-)maintain. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-14 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
I took the golang cgroup ones, since I'm familiarized with it, as well as with golang. Also trying to start getting into golang packages. On 1/14/25 5:00 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: olang(github.com/containerd/containerd/cio) = 1.6.23-1.fc41, golang(github.com/containerd/container

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
Hi Jerry, I made you main admin of the three projects. I stayed as admin in case you need a hand. Thank you, Carlos R.F. On 1/8/25 4:07 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:29 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: I'm taking because of their dependencies: * lrcalc * Singular

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:29 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > I'm taking because of their dependencies: > > * lrcalc > > * Singular > > * imlib2 > > * cliquer > > > If any of the previous admin, committers, or collaborators to those > packages want to take it, please let me know. I have cont

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Michel Lind
On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 23:46 -0600, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > Report started at 2025-01-08 05:00:11 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure > that the package should be re

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 08/01/25 06:46, maxwell--- via devel-announce ha scritto: > python-pyramid_sawing orphan 0 weeks ago Taking it, since it is used by Bodhi. Mattia -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
I'm taking because of their dependencies: * lrcalc * Singular * imlib2 * cliquer If any of the previous admin, committers, or collaborators to those packages want to take it, please let me know. Regards, Carlos R.F. On 1/7/25 10:46 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: Report start

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Taking and fixing python-repoze-lru. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Tuesday, January 7th, 2025 at 11:46 PM, maxwell--- via devel-announc

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2025-01-08 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2025-01-08 05:00:11 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: guayadeque-0.6.2 crashes on Fedora 41 with new version of wxsqlite3-4.10.0

2025-01-05 Thread Martin Gansser
excluding the new cipher scheme AEGIS with ./configure --without-aegis solves the problem. Regards Martin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

guayadeque-0.6.2 crashes on Fedora 41 with new version of wxsqlite3-4.10.0

2025-01-03 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, I have compiled and installed wxsqlite3-4.10.0 for Fedora 41. I have also recompiled and installed guayadeque-0.6.2. Now guayadeque crashes and a guayadeque.xml with the following content is created.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:55:13AM -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote: > > maxwell--- via devel-announce > > writes: > > > fedscm-admin cqi, ignatenkobrain, limb, 3 weeks > > ago > > mohanboddu, orphan, tibbs > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-18 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> maxwell--- via devel-announce > writes: > fedscm-admin cqi, ignatenkobrain, limb, 3 weeks > ago > mohanboddu, orphan, tibbs > I can't think of any reason this shouldn't simply be retired. All of the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-18 Thread Davide Cavalca
aprsd orphan 4 weeks ago xdemorse orphan 4 weeks ago xpsk31orphan 4 weeks ago I've taken these. Cheers Davide -- _

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-12 Thread Julian Sikorski
Am 09.12.24 um 15:30 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: I took sparse, and http-parser. http-parser in particular is a dead project upstream. However, there is a good set of packages depending on it. There are also past contributors.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-10 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
It does build without that dependency :) The tests were passing but I had to kill it because it was using lots of memory, and as a result, my machine was running out of RAM, and the oomkiller was out doing its thing. On 12/10/24 7:38 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:28 A

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-10 Thread Neil Hanlon
I've picked up Xastir On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 12:14 PM maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > > Report started at 2024-12-06 15:00:14 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:28 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > > I agree. This dead package has probably security issues waiting to be > discovered. > > There are the other projects as well that would need some relook at its > http-parser dependency and see if it can be dropped: julia, cantor

Re: flamethrower vs. http-parser (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2024-12-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Petr Špaček wrote: > > On 09. 12. 24 15:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez > >> wrote: > >>> I took sparse, and http-parser. > >>> > >>> http-parse

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-09 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
I agree. This dead package has probably security issues waiting to be discovered. There are the other projects as well that would need some relook at its http-parser dependency and see if it can be dropped: julia, cantor, and LabPlot. Regards, Carlos R.F. On 12/9/24 7:30 AM, Stephen Gall

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez > wrote: > > > > I took sparse, and http-parser. > > > > http-parser in particular is a dead project upstream. However, there is a > > good set of packages depending on it. Ther

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > > I took sparse, and http-parser. > > http-parser in particular is a dead project upstream. However, there is a > good set of packages depending on it. There are also past contributors. If > any of the past contributors want to

Re: New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-07 Thread Bojan Smojver via devel
These two options always confuse me, but it should be the former (the other one applies to main only), so the option is correct. Ignore me - it probably has nothing to do with invocation. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-07 Thread Bojan Smojver via devel
Is it skip_if_unavalable or skip_unavailable? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-con

Re: New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-07 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 07/12/24 05:48, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:30:15PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 03:03:04AM +, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: >>> Looks like bodhi upgrade may have caused composes to go haywire today: >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/compo

Re: New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:30:15PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 03:03:04AM +, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Looks like bodhi upgrade may have caused composes to go haywire today: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/composes/ > > > > It could be just a coincidence,

Re: New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 03:03:04AM +, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > Looks like bodhi upgrade may have caused composes to go haywire today: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/composes/ > > It could be just a coincidence, of course. Anyhow, just FYI if anyone > managing that is around. Yeah

New bodhi struggling with composes

2024-12-06 Thread Bojan Smojver via devel
Looks like bodhi upgrade may have caused composes to go haywire today: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/composes/ It could be just a coincidence, of course. Anyhow, just FYI if anyone managing that is around. -- Bojan -- ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-12-06 Thread maxwell--- via devel-announce
Report started at 2024-12-06 15:00:14 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-28 Thread Benson Muite
On 27/11/2024 6.02 pm, Neil Hanlon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 6:10 PM Michel Lind wrote: >> Would you be interested in helping out? This probably counts as a >> system-wide change, I'll try and have it written up next week after >> Thanksgiving. > > I'd be interested in helping with this ef

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-27 Thread Neil Hanlon
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 6:10 PM Michel Lind wrote: > Would you be interested in helping out? This probably counts as a > system-wide change, I'll try and have it written up next week after > Thanksgiving. I'd be interested in helping with this effort, as it's either parallel or tangential to grpc

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-26 Thread Michel Lind
dating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current old version also > breaks stuff. > > One solution is to create two versions, as offered in the PR above, but > this has not seen any action yet. > Yeah... sorry for the delay. I've been sounding out people on a Change Proposa

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
is has not seen any action yet. > > > > I'm in the camp of needing a newer protobuf in rawhide/F41 due to > > other > > packages needing the newer version. (so in a way, I am happy to > > break > > the old stuff over breaking the new stuff as is the case

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 11:14 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf > version packaged in fedora: > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28 > > Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current o

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
stuff. One solution is to create two versions, as offered in the PR above, but this has not seen any action yet. I'm in the camp of needing a newer protobuf in rawhide/F41 due to other packages needing the newer version. (so in a way, I am happy to break the old stuff over breaking the new stu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >