[FLOCK] Looking for FPL Stories

As many of you probably know, Matthew Miller is moving on from the Fedora Project Leader role this year[1]. As the longest-serving FPL in the history of the Fedora Project, it seems right and proper that we should send him off with a bit of a celebration, and this year's Flock to Fedora conference

Re: Python distro deps for builds using venv

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 9:30 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi python folks, > > I have a package [1] (you can toggle the with_python var at the top) that > now builds the python bindings in an isolated venv+pip environment, and > hence fails, [2]. > > It seems, at least in the way upstream currently

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:40 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 01. 25 v 16:40 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 12:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > Note that side tags aren'

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:12 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 27. 01. 25 v 15:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:40 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> >> Dne 26. 01. 25 v 16:40 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >> >> >> >>

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 12:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Note that side tags aren't the only issue. Sometimes a maintainer > > commits a bump to git but doesn't build it in a side tag or rawhide, > > for whatever reason. Sometimes a package is*built*,

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 09:45 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:08 PM Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Much like libtest, the mass rebu

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:08 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to > have been garbage collected)

Re: Build order

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:01 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 18. 01. 25 v 11:01 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > > I have an idea I'd like to hear you out on how to reduce failures on > > mass rebuilds. > > > > I think some of the build failures are due to building things out of > > sequence. I

Re: Proposal to remove tomcat-servlet-api, tomcat-el-api, and tomcat-jsp-api packages from Fedora 42+

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 9:35 AM Dimitris Soumis wrote: > I am writing to propose the removal of the following packages from Fedora > 42+: > > tomcat-servlet-api > tomcat-el-api > tomcat-jsp-api > > These packages were originally designed to provide the servlet, EL, and > JSP APIs sepa

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-01-14)

Quick summary: We discussed the mass-update of packages to use `git-core` instead of `git` for dependencies. We agreed that merge requests may be mass-submitted and that a provenpackager (zbyszek) will merge them after four weeks of inactivity. MRs can be merged by the maintainer before then or re

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-01-14)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-01-14 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 3 weeks

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:07 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > should be retired from Fedora 42 approximately one week before branching, > i.e. 2025-01-28. ... > pam_yubiconb,

Re: flamethrower vs. http-parser (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Petr Špaček wrote: > > On 09. 12. 24 15:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez > >> wrote: > >>> I took

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez > wrote: > > > > I took sparse, and http-parser. > > > > http-parser in particular is a dead project upstream. However, there is a > &g

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 12:21 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > > I took sparse, and http-parser. > > http-parser in particular is a dead project upstream. However, there is a > good set of packages depending on it. There are also past contributors. If > any of the past contributors want to

Re: Self Introduction: Tomáš Juhász

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:52 AM Tomas Juhasz wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > My name is Tomas, I'm 23 and newly a part of the nodejs maintainers team at > red hat. > > I have been a linux user for almost 8 years now and I'm really happy that I > now have the opportunity to help the project. > > I

Orphaning nodejs-less

This is the Node.js package "Less.js" which converts "less" (LEaner Style Sheets) into CSS. I haven't used it for many years, I haven't been able to get 4.2.0 to build and I just don't have the time or inclination to work on it. I've thus orphaned it. If it's useful to you, please go ahead and pi

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-11-19)

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org > on Matrix. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://f

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-11-19)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-11-19 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:41 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:30 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-11-15 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:30 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-11-15 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > * Start planning for 2025 > Source: https://calendar.fedorapr

Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel, please. """ The number “4

Re: What is the status of i686 in Fedora?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 9:48 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, Linux-PAM released v1.7.0 > , which among > other changes, now requires the fop package to build the documentation. > However, this package depends on Java, which is

Re: Should %ldconfig_scripts be removed in Rawhide?

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:29 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 13:19 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 22/10/2024 13:17, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > > On 22/10/2024 13:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should: > > >

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 2:43 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-10-18 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet..

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-10-18 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > We will have an Open Floor meeting tomorrow. Bring your questions

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-10-15)

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:44 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org > on Matrix. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://f

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-10-15)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-10-15 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: strawman proposal: homed directories for users

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:23 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > > > > This was again a reference to the fact that IPA folks aren't willing > > to restrict their allocations

Re: strawman proposal: homed directories for users

On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:35 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 08.10.24 12:23, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > > > > On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development M

Re: strawman proposal: homed directories for users

On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) > wrote: > > > Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > > For example, I am fundamentally opposed to the model > > > these systems generally pursu

Re: Fedora eln compose report: 20241003.n.0 changes

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 12:13 AM Fedora ELN Report wrote: > > OLD: Fedora-eln-20241002.n.1 > NEW: Fedora-eln-20241003.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:0 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 0 > Dropped packages:0 > Upgraded packages: 0 > Downgraded packages: 0 FY

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

There are no urgent topics on the queue and several key members of the SIG will be unavailable. The ELN SIG meeting for 2024-10-04 is CANCELED. On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-10-04 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Ea

Re: What is "FAILED: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (tag)"

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:30 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We wanted to build pesign so we can automatically trigger RISC-V > builds, since for some reason (I guess related to this) it hasn't been > built for f42 & f41. But ... > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124051163

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:01 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-09-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-09-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > TASK: Work with QA on update grouping, handling mass rebuild-type

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-09-06 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > = # #meeting:fedoraproject.org

Re: (fedora) Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: > > > > Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups > > pass to the fedora-dev list, > > so please if you're interested follow the discussion on on

Re: Django packaging options for alternate stacks - advice needed

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:58 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:48:23PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > We thought the SIG might want to chime in on this (might as well sort it > > out before I start writing documentation anyway) - any pros/cons we have > > not t

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:02 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-08-30 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: Fedora eln compose report: 20240829.n.1 changes

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 7:58 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Interesting. I see this for the first time and appreciate the report. > Thanks to whoever enabled it. > This was sent out by accident while I am working on converting our ELN builds away from ODCS. Once that work is complete, we will be sendi

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-08-30 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > * Status update on converting away from ODCS * Discussion on how

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-08-27)

= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco = Meeting started by @sgallagh:fedora.im at 2024-08-27 17:00:57 Full meeting logs available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-08-27/fesco.2024-08-

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-08-27)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-08-27 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Due to an internal Red Hat holiday tomorrow, this meeting has been POSTPONED until August 30th. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-08-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat >

[Canceled] Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-08-20)

There are no topics scheduled to be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. It is therefore canceled. I will chair the next meeting on Tuesday, August 27th. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHo

Re: Changing the location of the configuration file during update process

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:21 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote: > > Hi, > > Recently, pam_radius released a new version and with it changed the location > of the config file everywhere, giving us the opportunity to align with > upstream and remove all our downstream-only patches. > > During the package upda

ELN: Accidental Mass-Rebuild (why it happened)

Some of you have probably noticed that Koji is a bit overloaded at the moment. Well, that's my fault. Sorry about that. I'm writing up a post-mortem on how it happened so we can all learn from my mistakes. This time around, we coordinated with releng to update the Rawhide tag we trigger on as part

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

This week’s meeting is CANCELED due to many of the participants being at the Flock to Fedora conference. The next meeting will be in two weeks. On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-08-09 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eas

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:54 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a): > >> > >> Having a

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-07-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet..

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-07-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: The sunsetting of the ELN Extras sub-project and brainstorming how

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a): > > Having a "majority rule" vote of e.g. packagers or provenpackagers on > major technical decisions would be far superior, in my view. Apache > communities have worked this way forever. > >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:37 PM kefu chai wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:22 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >> wrote: >> > >> > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or > > everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). > > You're right, a compatibility version is required to unbreak Koji/dnf5

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:41 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > >

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On pondělí 15. července 2024 16:32:45, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > &g

Re: the sad state of installability tests

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:06 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This seems like overkill. Wouldn't the simplest valid installability > > test just be to test whether each subpackage *individually*

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > Instead of always keeping "Rawhide" around as a separate buildroot, > why not just rename it at Branching and then create a NEW Rawhide > chroo

Re: Fedora 41 Mass Rebuild Notification - Scheduled for 2024-07-17

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 9:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 3:38 odp. samyak.j...@gmail.com napsal(a): > > The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to > > multiple lists and previously handled on another list. > > This is not first time I see this. First I

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:25 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello maintainers. > > This is a gentle heads-up (at least a year in advance) that we plan to > address Fedora Copr storage consumption related to Fedora Rawhide > builds. Currently, Rawhide build results are kept indefinitely, but > this i

Re: the sad state of installability tests

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 8:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:45:53AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > napsal(a): > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > I gu

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 3:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 09:11:49AM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, one thing that we ALSO lost in the conversion to Matrix was that > > the minutes used to include links to the full text (in both text

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-07-12 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet..

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 7:38 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:46:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I'm saying the thing they > > are doing today is not really valuable for a consumer base that wasn't > > in the meeting. If they want to make it better, AI is a t

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-07-12 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: Converting away from ODCS for ELN composes. -- _

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:56 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Josh

Re: PR for rebuild and autochangelog

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM David Bold wrote: > > Sandro wrote: > > On 09-07-2024 17:01, David Bold wrote: > > > Is it possible to have a PR without any code changes? > > > Is there an alternative, recommended way to ask for rebuilds? > > Specifically in the case of %autorelease, you can bump

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:17 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-06-28 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > Due to a lack of agenda topics, today's meeting is CANCELED --

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to > > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some > > form of l

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:48 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > As I recall from a previous query, there are > > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and > > ~250 total who were in the PP group). > > I think most privacy/security focused develope

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 06. 24 19:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > tickets are valid for 24hours and can be renewed for 1 week. (Either via > > gnome online accounts or just 'kinit -R') > > How do I do that? > > $ fkinit > ... all good ... > > later: > > $ klist >

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:11:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > > Messaggio originale > > 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > > > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:11 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > Messaggio originale > 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a > > burden... but it does seem to be. ;( > > > > Once a week? When I get

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:54 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a > > burden... but it does seem to be. ;( > > > > kevin > > It isn't just once. > > 1. kerberos > 2. Web login on infra, bugzilla, bodhi, devel list and accounts Not really a

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:40 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:07 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen! > > > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the nodejsXX packages in a > >

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:07 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > > Hi Stephen! > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the nodejsXX packages in a > > little over a week. As of yet, no one has requested access to take it > > over. If anyone is g

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:28 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Guinevere Larsen venit, vidit, dixit 2024-06-24 13:53:37: > > On 6/24/24 5:08 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 24. 06. 24 v 9:48 dop. Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > > >> IMO, having the token stored in your password manager means

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said: > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension" > > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want > > to run on anc

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:49 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Stephen Smoogen said: > > I don't think Peter meant additional packages since with the i686 it > > didn't mean that. What it did mean was having to understand why two > > architectures might do things differently and why bug

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:32 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20 > and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will > continue to maintain libuv. > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:51 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:20:07PM +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > > Stephen Gallagher

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

ra.im (1) Full meeting notes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-17/fesco.2024-06-17-19.00.log.html On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:21 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Monday a

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-06-17 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:07 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:59:25AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > IOW, if [when] we rebase Fedora to the next QEMU upstream rele

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > There have been various change proposals & associated mailing list threads > over the years about the possibility of moving Fedora compiler toolchain > to build with a newer x86_64 baseline ABI, which have ended up rejected, > with some

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 1:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Looking forward to EPEL 10! More work for me, yay! > Just a few questions - I would have looked them up in the meeting log, > but i

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:10 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:02 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-05-31 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet..

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:02 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-05-31 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: Planning for EPEL 10, derived from ELN Extras. > > Source: https:

[Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20 and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will continue to maintain libuv. It's been a hard decision to come to, but I think this is the correct decision for me. I've been effectively the sole maintainer of No

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

tunately: > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-ejs > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-execjs > > > > > > The former is using the latter, so the real issue is likely in the > > > latter

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-20)

= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: FESCO (2024-05-20) !meetingname fesco Chairs: @conan_kudo:matrix.org, @ngompa:fedora.im, @nirik:matrix.scrye.com, @humaton:fedora.im, @zbyszek:fedora.im, @sgallagh:fedora.im, @jistone:fedora.im, @dcantrell:fedora.im, @mhayden:fedor

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-20)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-05-20 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

This meeting is canceled due to lack of agenda. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-05-17 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source: htt

Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

As of today, I have built Node.js 22.2.0 for Fedora Rawhide. It is currently available as a non-default package (Node.js 20 remains the default during this short transition period). If you maintain a package that depends on Node.js (either runtime or build-time), please take some time in the next

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change > > I already filed? I can amend that (and ask FESCo to re-vote based o

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:38 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:21 AM Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:02 PM Stephen Gallagher >

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:02 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Upstream Node.js has not supported the i686 architecture officially > > since Node.js 10.x (released in 2018). As of Node.js 22, it appears > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >