Re: about this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346041 what is your opinion ?

2025-05-07 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 18:50 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 07/05/25 14:25, Sérgio Basto via devel ha scritto: > > Hello, > > > > ... > > I think this is an example of really bad communication from both > sides. > Clearly both you and Michel have

about this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346041 what is your opinion ?

2025-05-07 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hello, On 2025-02-17 00:45 I started Review Request: 7zip,  one hour and 1/4 after  2025-02-17 02:07 Neal Gompa take the review request one month later 2025-03-20 17:40:54 Michel Lind wrote saying that also made a Review Request for 7zip on next day 2025-04-21 23:26:17 Neal Gompa replie

Re: GoldenCheetah-3.7-2.fc41 crashes on fc41/fc42

2025-05-06 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-05-06 at 14:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > On Tue, 2025-05-06 at 09:09 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > What I have now noticed is, that I can start GoldenCheetah on my > > physical machine running Fedora 41, but only directly from the > > console. &g

Re: GoldenCheetah-3.7-2.fc41 crashes on fc41/fc42

2025-05-06 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-05-06 at 09:09 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > What I have now noticed is, that I can start GoldenCheetah on my > physical machine running Fedora 41, but only directly from the > console. > However, if I start via the desktop shortcut with the option “env > QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb GoldenChe

Re: GoldenCheetah-3.7-2.fc41 crashes on fc41/fc42

2025-05-05 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 14:27 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > I have set the environment variables, but no luck, it still crashes. > Thanks for your tip. can you open khelpcenter (with crash after a little while) ? dnf install khelpcenter -- Sérgio M. B. --

Re: GoldenCheetah-3.7-2.fc41 crashes on fc41/fc42

2025-05-05 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 12:32 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > when I compile and start GoldenCheetah-3.7 [1] on Fedora41/F42 with > qt6, the program crashes. > I start GoldenCheetah here on a VM ware with fc41. > > [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/GoldenCheetah.spec > > f4

Re: PSA - A change in Docker cli plugin version management (Compose, BuildKit, Buildx)

2025-04-30 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-04-30 at 08:05 -0700, Brad Smith wrote: > FESCo has approved an update policy exception that encompasses these > Docker plugins: Compose, BuildKit, and Buildx > (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3394). The rpms for these plugins will > now track the current plugin release across all Fedor

Re: MIXXX 2.5.1 build

2025-04-29 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 19:05 +0100, Luis Correia wrote: > Hi, > > I'm humbling asking for help, no idea of what is wrong here: > https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=679170 > > It also failed locally, which I forgot to check first, sorry for > wasting kojii build time... from https://

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

2025-04-23 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 19:55 +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandOnlyGNOME > Discussion thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-wayland-only-gnome-self-contained/150261 > > This is a proposed Change for

orphaning some packages

2025-04-18 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, I need to reduce my workload so some packages with impact but I have nothing to do with it: - bc - gflags - gperf - libcomps - atf - libphonenumber Package that I don't use anymore or obsoleted : - tofrodos - rawstudio - smb4k Package that give to much work ; - ogre Best regards, -- S

[Heads up] soundtouch-2.4.0 on rawhide

2025-04-17 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, soundtouch-2.4.0 was build on rawhide, don't have soname bump but some symbols were removed [1] . I don't know if we should rebuild the dependent packages (12): Io-language ardour6 ardour7 ardour8 audacity audacity-freeworld desmume easyeffects gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free mixxx mythtv

Re: Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

2025-04-17 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 12:04 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 4/16/25 5:58 AM, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen > > <mailto:ssmoo...@redhat.com>> wrote: >

Re: Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

2025-04-16 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone gone through

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

2025-04-15 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 00:23 +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > I've opened a PR which restores gdm/X11 support > at: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/pull-request/28# > > It builds, I'll be able to test it in a few hours, but anybody is > free and welcome to give it a try once the scratch b

Re: Awesome (X11) WM on Fedora 42 Beta

2025-04-09 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 16:44 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > You need to switch to another display manager, as GDM no longer > > supports X11 sessions. > > Time to fork GDM. > "It is being explicitly dropped from GDM as the code to X11 greeter mode is also tied to sup

Re: Looking for maintainer of bc and SFML more gperf and atf

2025-04-07 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 14:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > I adopt bc and SFML [3] to avoid one mass removing of packages some > time ago , these two packages have some dependencies , but I'm not > very > familiar with them > > Recently an user , ask me to

Re: GCC defined(__cplusplus) one rawhide

2025-03-13 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 14:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 22:44, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 21:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Red Hat OSIDB Bzimport bot closed ALL (??) security bugs

2025-03-11 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > I just started looking at my emails today and it looks like the OSIDB > Bzimport bot closed *all* (or at least almost all) open security > issues in bugzilla as "CLOSED WONTFIX". Not all , I still have many security bugs ope

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42

2025-03-08 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:46 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > torque torque was retired and already don't have f42 branch , the build was made before f42 branch on rawhide . At first glance the retirement of the package seem that isn't complete -- Sérgio M. B. --

Re: Problems aftes update to F42

2025-03-07 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 06:15 -0800, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:02:52PM -, Filip Bartmann wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I update Fedora 41 to Fedora 42 prerelase and I have some > > > problems, notably >

Re: GCC defined(__cplusplus) one rawhide

2025-02-11 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 21:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +0000, Sérgio Basto via devel > > wrote: > > > I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before su

Re: Where to fill bugs for fedora-kickstarts?

2025-02-10 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 09:56 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi, > I cannot find a place where to fill a bug against fedora-kickstarts. > The page [1] says it's bugzilla [2], but when I try it, the bugzilla > rejects me with "The component value 'spin-kickstarts' is not > active.". yeah, https://s

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.11 with soname bump in rawhide

2025-02-06 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 01:48 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 23:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Remove el, jsp and servlet packages from tomcat

2025-02-06 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 18:01 +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > > == Feedback == > No feedback is received. As a tomcat user , this remove of tomcat-servlet-api, tomcat-el-api, and tomcat-jsp-api doesn't affect me BTW I'd like to fix tomcat 9 in RHEL9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.11.0 with soname bump on rawhide

2025-02-05 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 10:40 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 12:35 +0000, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 02:00 +0000, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > > > On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 01:06 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > > >

bin-sbin merge case of packages which install to hardcoded $DESTDIR/usr/sbin

2025-02-04 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, In this case: "packages which install to hardcoded $DESTDIR/usr/sbin, but then use %{_sbindir} in %files, will need to be adjusted." I did this [1] after the make install, is that correct ? [1] %if "%{_sbindir}" == "%{_bindir}" mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} mv %{buildroot}/usr/

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

2025-02-04 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 10:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 05:21:41PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 08:50 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 08:47:16PM +, Sérgio Bas

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.11.0 with soname bump on rawhide

2025-02-04 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 02:00 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 01:06 +0000, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > > Hi, > > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is > > finish and merge it before the mass branch which is scheduled

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.11.0 with soname bump on rawhide

2025-02-03 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 01:06 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > Hi, > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is > finish and merge it before the mass branch which is scheduled for 4 > of > Feb of 2025 Started  Building opencv-4.11.0-1.fc42 for f42-bu

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.11 with soname bump in rawhide

2025-02-03 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 23:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please > > let me > > know we have any objection that prevent

[heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.11.0 with soname bump on rawhide

2025-02-02 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before the mass branch which is scheduled for 4 of Feb of 2025 Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

2025-01-31 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 20:51 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi! > > In accordance with > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/, > I plan to do a "mass package change" to add sysusers.d config files > for all packages > which currently call 'useradd' and 'grou

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

2025-01-31 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Wed, 2025-01-29 at 08:47 -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 09:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > clamsmtp    gnat > > I've just gotten in contact with the upstream source maintainer that > is > assisting in trying to get this to build. We're currently

[heads up] update to jpegxl-0.11 with soname bump in rawhide

2025-01-30 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please let me know we have any objection that prevent to proceeding. Best regards, [1] dnf repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires "libjxl*" --qf "%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}\n" | pkgname rawhide GraphicsMagick rawhide ImageMagick ra

Re: GCC __cplusplus definition on rawhide and ciso646

2025-01-28 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-01-28 at 10:06 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +0000, Sérgio Basto via devel > wrote: > > I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before submitting a > > fix in > > gtest package > > > > The problem is

Re: GCC __cplusplus definition on rawhide

2025-01-27 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 19:31 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > Hi, > > I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before submitting a fix > in > gtest package > > The problem is on Rawhide I have this warning that make other > packages > fail to build [1]

Re: GCC defined(__cplusplus) one rawhide

2025-01-27 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 20:52 +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > According to the CPP standard, and the deprecation was > added in CPP20 [1] so would be best not to patch that part > unconditionally in the gtest source. Maybe you could patch in a > pragma to disable the warning instead? > > Anot

GCC defined(__cplusplus) one rawhide

2025-01-27 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
Hi, I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before submitting a fix in gtest package The problem is on Rawhide I have this warning that make other packages fail to build [1] gtest source [2] source get __cplusplus value and include or #include depending on __cplusplus value . On rawhi

Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.15.2 [was Re: Fedora Linux f42 Mass Rebuild is finished]

2025-01-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
whether simply > > rebuilding dependent packages will resolve the issues. > > > > If just rebuilding everything in a new side tag turns out to be > > workable, then I’m happy to take care of it. I maintain or co- > > maintain > > several of the impacted packa

Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.15.2 [was Re: Fedora Linux f42 Mass Rebuild is finished]

2025-01-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 16:21 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce > > wrote: > > > there are 1875 failed builds > > > that need to be add

Re: Fedora Linux f42 Mass Rebuild is finished

2025-01-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce > wrote: > > there are 1875 failed builds > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. > > Hi, > am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some m

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Replace SDL 2 with sdl2-compat using SDL 3 (self-contained)

2025-01-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 18:21 +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDL2onSDL3 > Discussion Thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-replace-sdl-2-with-sdl2-compat-using-sdl-3-self-contained/138987 > > This is a pr

Looking for maintainer of bc and SFML

2025-01-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, I adopt bc and SFML [3] to avoid one mass removing of packages some time ago , these two packages have some dependencies , but I'm not very familiar with them Recently an user , ask me to consider "Consider switching gnub-bc to howard-bc"[1] and [2] and change from gcc to clang . Anyon

Re: GCC 15 for Fedora 42 in a side-tag

2025-01-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2025-01-13 at 11:45 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > With the Fedora 42 mass rebuild approaching, I've built gcc 15 > snapshot > (and annobin/libtool) in the > > f42-build-side-103300 > > side-tag. > > Feel free to do scratch builds against this side-tag  https://koji.fedoraproje

Re: Need assistance to build Blender

2025-01-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 10:15 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >   > Hello team, >   > Blender failed to build due to an issue related to Python rules > changes and an additional >  failure from this line: >   > /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.3.2-build/blender- > 4.3.2/source/blender/python/gpu/gpu_p

Re: libnova: announcing soname bump

2025-01-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 17:49 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > > > > Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, > > libnova > > was never updated and it's still 0.15 in Fedora. > > > > I have notified the package m

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

2024-12-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 17:32 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > I just installed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.17-11.fc41 to see if it > makes any > difference, forcing its use via /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/. It made no > difference > apparent to me, so I removed the config and the nouveau DDX rpm, > which normally

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

2024-12-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 18:15 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Felix Miata composed on 2024-12-13 16:25 (UTC-0500): > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > > > 6.11.11-300.fc41

Re: F42 libtimezone unannounced removal

2024-12-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2024-12-18 at 15:08 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > Please readd libtimezone for f42 and give me ownership. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333021 > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimezonemap/c/3e1e20e5d49c4a3b144f8fb285c4b913dfc9bd43?branch=rawhide IMHO , we should

Re: On revoking provenpackager from probinson

2024-12-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 21:09 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > I have already withdrawn my FESCo election votes as I don't think any > of the candidates are fit to rule. the Committee voted – seven in favor, two against – to remove Peter from the provenpackager -- Sérgio M. B. -- _

Re: Rawhide, koji: cannot build because of conflicting requests

2024-12-03 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 16:47 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji.  I'm > > getting the following errors: > > > > DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded. > > DEBUG util.py:4

Re: Michel's package orphaning thread - part 1: xonsh

2024-11-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2024-11-23 at 08:51 +, balakumaran kannan wrote: > Hi Michel Lind and All, > > I'm willing to adopt the maintenance of xonsh. > > I'm new to Fedora project. I'm not part of the packager group. > I've one PR for python-httptools which got merged recently - > https://src.fedoraproject.o

Re: claim ownership of a goocanvas

2024-11-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 14:19 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to claim ownership of a goocanvas that has been orphaned for > > more than six weeks. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/goocanvas > > > > I was able to build the package for f40 and f41, but not for > > rawhide.

xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu, Orphaned by releng, why ?

2024-11-24 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, I can't find the reason of xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu being orphaned . can some one point me the ticket ? Thank you -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 17:23 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 11. 24 17:14, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the > > protobuf > > version packaged in fedora: > > > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/2

Re: Obtaining the RPM_ARCH etc. environment variables

2024-11-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 09:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Is > >   eval `rpm --eval %___build_pre_env` > > the canonical way to obtain definitions of these environment > variables, > or is there a better alternative? > from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092#c80 to the "offic

Re: ABI change in ImageMagick

2024-11-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 16:40 -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100 > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.

Re: ABI change in ImageMagick

2024-11-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 14:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 00:04 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 18:14 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:43 AM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: ABI change in ImageMagick

2024-11-13 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 18:14 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:43 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 07:35 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > > > Le 11/11/2024 à 11:02, Dan Horák a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: ABI change in ImageMagick

2024-11-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 07:35 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 11/11/2024 à 11:02, Dan Horák a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change > > > > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit) > > and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) inste

Re: Should %ldconfig_scripts be removed in Rawhide?

2024-10-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 13:19 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 22/10/2024 13:17, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 22/10/2024 13:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should: > > > > > >    %ldconfig_scriptlets > > > > > > be removed from Raw

Re: X11 support removed from GDM 1:47.0-1

2024-10-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 08:07 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024, 1:52 AM Joe Doss wrote: > > This is going to cause a lot of problems for users that use Fedora > > for > > things such as gaming on Linux. Some games do not work well with > > Wayland > > just yet and have many

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide

2024-10-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 11:02 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Peter Robinson writes: > > Hello Peter and Adam, > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently > > > retired > > > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > >

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-09-29 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote: > > > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with > > > Nouveau drive > > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_request

Re: Package updates missing in Fedora 41 but present in Fedora 40

2024-09-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 13:13 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > It's that time of the year again - pointing out packages that are at > a > lower version in Fedora 41 (branched) than Fedora 40 (stable). > For those that are just obviously missing unintentionally, I plan to > submit the miss

FailsToInstall bugs, can we have it enable on EPEL branches ?

2024-09-21 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello, On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 10:03 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > Hello, > > Please note that this comment was generated automatically by > https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py Have this scripts running on EPEL branches would help me detect FTI more quick

Re: "tunneler" package is broken - should it get removed?

2024-09-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 18:25 +, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > Sorry, but I don't really have interest in taking care of that > > package. [...] > > So it would be great if this could either be fixed by somebody, or > > removed > > completely. > I'd be willing to take this over. Let me see if

Re: How to handle nodejs bundling with native compiled modules ?

2024-09-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 06:39 -0400, Jan Staněk wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Node.js in Fedora generally suffers from lack of community/interest > in > this particular combination. Aside from sporadic drive-by > contribution, > AFAIK I'm the only one somewhat invested/paid for caring for it. A problem that

Re: Location of available packages and versions for EPEL 10?

2024-09-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 18:46 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 9/19/24 14:31, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > > > Dunno if there’s a better place to ask, but as part of trying to > > build Swift for EPEL 10 I’ve been running into some old issues that > > were resolved because of later versions o

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 14:57 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:50 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > I'd like to understand, so what in "X server 21.1" broke ? from > > this > > thread [1] only 340xx driver stopped to work , 390xx supports

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-06 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 13:58 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the > > > NVIDIA > &g

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-06 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA > binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX > instead of the modesetting driver, that could be a problem if the ABI > broke. Here it says, some NVIDIA

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the > > > NVIDIA > > binary driver. > > It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx,  it's in a poor state due to > legacy drm removal. X11 DDX was remove because, IIR

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases > (almost 3 years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of > patches that have already been upstreamed during this time. > > No one that is listed in t

[EPEL-devel] Can someone approve my msg ? Fwd: Your message to epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits moderator approval

2024-09-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, Can someone approve my msg ? Thank you Forwarded Message From: epel-announce-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org To: ser...@serjux.com Subject: Your message to epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits moderator approval Date: 30/08/2024 16:16:55 Your mail to 'epel-annou...

Re: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’

2024-07-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 01:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 07. 24 1:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I got build failure of pypy3.9 and pypy3.10 on x86_64 only, with: > > > >  collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’ > >  compilation terminated. > > > > See the CI results o

Re: [Head ups] opencv update to 4.10.0 with a soname bump in rawhide

2024-07-26 Thread Sérgio Basto
side-tag f41-build-side-92992 pushed to rawhide sdrangel doesn't build due a problem with dependencies , gr-funcube doesn't built with new fmt On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 22:22 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > from > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290312 &

[Head ups] opencv update to 4.10.0 with a soname bump in rawhide

2024-07-25 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290312 we will rebuild [1] on a side-tag f41-build-side-92992 except python- torch I don't expect any problem [1] rawhide OpenImageIO rawhide YafaRay rawhide caffe rawhide digikam rawhide dtkmultimedia rawhide frei0r-plugins rawhide gmic r

Re: [Java related] packaging Italian ID card middleware

2024-07-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 16:42 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > Hello, I discussed the feasibility of packaging > https://github.com/italia/cie-middleware-linux > in Fedora devel Matrix channel with Cristian Le and xvitaly. With the > help of Cristian Le I wrote the following [1] draft that will

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-07-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 12:56 +0200, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote: >  I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default > Python is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 > > Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the > spec file if it is? > you have p

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-07-14 at 12:29 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 7/13/24 4:39 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back > > ? > > > > It seems that you will need to compile your own kernel

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-13 Thread Sérgio Basto
if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back ? and please stop use the argument of the security , I don't know how write it with nice words , but saying one untested software have better security that an very old one is not fair to me , is just not a good argument to me.

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-07-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2024-07-06 at 08:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:55 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:34 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > On 6/4/24 5:39 AM, Ian Laurie via devel wrote: >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-07-06 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:34 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 6/4/24 5:39 AM, Ian Laurie via devel wrote: > > On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already > >

Re: Automatic detection of unused BuildRequires

2024-07-03 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:02 +0200, Marián Konček wrote: > > As many of you know, as packages change, so do their BuildRequires. > > In > > the current state, maintaining them requires some manual work from > > the > > maintainer. > > > > 1. So I got around the idea of a simple tool that checks f

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-06-23 at 09:50 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > How do I disable this?, it has made kerberos login much harder. > I'm considering ditching provenpackager rights if that is a > condition. This (2FA) is not enforced or checked, -- Sérgio M. B. -- __

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

2024-06-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 07:58 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > also a huge thank you from my side. > You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora! I'd like send the same message - also a huge thank you from my side. - You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora -- Sérgio M. B. -- _

Re: F41 Change Deadlines and other important deadlines!

2024-06-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello, I saw in key tasks:  "Mass Rebuild: RPMs first, then modules", modules aren't over ?  BTW we continue to receive CVE's bugzilla reports on modules for nextcloud on epel 8 for example , how we stop that ?  Thank you On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 09:46 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Hi folks, > >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: GIMP Version 3 (self-contained)

2024-06-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 14:00 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > On 6/17/24 02:39, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 16/06/2024 18:24, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > This release of Fedora Linux ships version 3 of the GNU Image > > > Manipulation Program, with many new features and improved

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Nvidia Driver Installation with Secure Boot Support (self-contained)

2024-06-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:44 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Wiki - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NvidiaInstallationWithSecureboot > Discussion Thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-nvidia-driver-installation-with-secure-boot-support-self-contained/120330 >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-06-11 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 19:48 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Tuesday 11 June 2024 14:52:19 CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I had enough with you an your attitude. You have been abusing the > good will > and temperament of many Fedora contributors for too long. Somebody > mus

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-06-11 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 14:26 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote: > On 04. 06. 24 5:39, Ian Laurie via devel wrote: > > On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already > > > > running

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

2024-06-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:56 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > As this change does not affect the resulting binary packages an > immediate rebuild is not needed. The change will "only" ensure the > packages still build with the new version of RPM. I think you should rebuild the packages because at the

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-06-06 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already > > running > > on Wayland by default for quite some time and even Live ISO is > > already > > Wayland. To my knowl

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-26 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 21:29 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > tl;dr I screwed up and accidentally made two critical mistakes: > > > > 1) Node.js 22 got into Rawhide as the default early. I'm not sure > > of > > how to back that out safely. > > 2

Re: Announcement: pagure release 5.14.1 available

2024-05-24 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote: > [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine,  to do that I need the package updated, please add some builds . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. --

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-21 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, Since the thread is in top posting, I will top posting too ... I also saw a "Native stack trace" [1] on Rawhide on nodejs-electron [2] Best regards, [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/electrons/build/7462286/ [1] [432/39358] python3 ../../tools/polymer/html_to_wrapper.py

Re: Intent to start ARC investigation git-forge replacement

2024-05-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: >  1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ? please join to https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20 Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. -

Re: When is Fedora 38 going EOL?

2024-05-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > When is Fedora 38 going EOL? > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html say > s today > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html say > next week > > Which one is correct? Bodhi s

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

2024-05-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 17:00 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3 > > > > What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not > gi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >