On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> wrote:
> > there are 1875 failed builds
> > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
> 
>       Hi,
> am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some middle
> time
> of the merge of the rebuild tag into the rawhide? The build [1] fails
> on package dependencies involving libphonenumber, abseil-cpp-devel,
> libgtest and libgmock. I do not recall when I saw any such package
> dependency problem on rawhide the last time.
>       Bye,
>       Milan
> 
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128295398
> 

package abseil-cpp on rawhide have some problem 

mock --config-opts mirrored=False install abseil-cpp-devel

Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_atomic_hook_test_helper.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none
of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_exception_safety_testing.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_hash_generator_testing.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none
of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_log_internal_test_actions.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_log_internal_test_helpers.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_log_internal_test_matchers.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_per_thread_sem_test_common.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_pow10_helper.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none of the
providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_scoped_mock_log.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none of the
providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_spinlock_test_common.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none of
the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_stack_consumption.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none of
the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_status_matchers.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none of the
providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_test_instance_tracker.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none
of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires libabsl_time_internal_test_util.so.2407.0.0()(64bit), but none
of the providers can be installed
  - package abseil-cpp-devel-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
requires abseil-cpp-testing(x86-64) = 20240722.0-4.fc42, but none of
the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libgmock.so.1.14.0()(64bit) needed by abseil-cpp-
testing-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local
  - nothing provides libgtest.so.1.14.0()(64bit) needed by abseil-cpp-
testing-20240722.0-4.fc42.x86_64 from local



-- 
Sérgio M. B.
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to