On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:50:21PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2025/05/06 20:44:
> >I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686:
> >
> >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279
> >
> >>config
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279
>
I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> See 'config.log' for more details
This isn't about this specific failure, but more of a shell / RPM
macro expansion
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Looks like there are some people around who need vpnc working...
Yup, at least two bugs have been reported (probably duplicates):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362815
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:53:36PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 4:10 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > Can we just stop building for i686 in Fedora in general, instead of burning
> > maintainer time figuring out deps problems like this... ? What's the
> > blocker an
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/pull-request/83
Previous discussion:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/C2U5RBADZB2ZUMR74PLNV73C3AIPSLWH/#C2U5RBADZB2ZUMR74PLNV73C3AIPSLWH
qemu currently builds binaries for i686, see eg:
https://koji.fedorapr
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:32:35AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15 2025 at 05:18:06 PM +01:00:00, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >What about Webex, the awful video conferencing software? I've no
> >desire to investigate this, but ISTR it lin
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching
> >
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there
> is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are
> crucial for
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:48:21PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrot> * mingw packages have irreproducible debug data.
Anything more information about this? What is it about the "debug
data" which is a problem, and can anything be done about it?
I assume this refers to files like
/us
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > We have be
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 01:00:38PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> > If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not
> > reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it has
> > all the drawbacks o
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 11:31:54AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrot
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS etc)?
> - how easy is it to run each locally for those who want to dogfood the
> process or participate in development?
I'm not sure it's really necessary to run
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> A few weeks back I started a discussion about accidental secrets,
> using Konflux as an example. Now that FOSDEM has come and gone, I’d
> like to take the topic further. If you’re not familiar with it,
> in its own words, Konflux
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
> have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account.
> This is a requirement for Fedora packagers.
>
> Does s
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:09:59 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same
> > builds of this package wor
This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same
builds of this package worked fine in F41/42/43.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129681254
I'm having a hard time trying to work out what the actual error is ...
I was wondering if perhaps Fedora 40 is now
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:49:35AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:44:25 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get
> > this strange error on s390x builders:
> >
> &
When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get
this strange error on s390x builders:
GenericError: Downloaded file
http://kojipkgs-cache03.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/1737/129631737/ocaml-gettext-0.5.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
doesn't match expected size (0 vs 145364)
Here are
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:55:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> 'fedrq wr -b rawhide openssl-devel-engine | wc -l' says 62.
That list should have been in the proposal! Here it is anyway ...
bind-32:9.18.33-1.fc43.src
boinc-client-8.0.2-2.fc42.src
cpprest-2.10.19-6.fc42.src
curl-8.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 09:14:21PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote:
> >>
> >> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as
> >> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable re
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:17:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
>
> With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I
> recently got an idea.
>
> One of the common needs for provenpackagers is to simply "bump and
> rebuild" a set of dependencies.
>
> All packagers are already
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:51:47PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> >>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
>
> Affected packages are:
> gvfs
> qemu
> vlc
> xine-lib
> kodi (RPM Fusion)
> mpd (RPM Fusion)
... and this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668
Hi Xavi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:17:49AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I
> guess some change to the test units has led to this error:
>
> […]
> + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f
> /build
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:57:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:03:21PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5c8c229261f14159b54b9a32f12e5fa89d88b905/kernel/module/Kconfig#L416
> >
> > Th
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5c8c229261f14159b54b9a32f12e5fa89d88b905/kernel/module/Kconfig#L416
This defaults to "/sbin/modprobe". Should it be changed to
"/usr/bin/modprobe"?
A few possible reasons:
(1) Bad RPM installers that don't run scripts, specifically the
filesystem.spec scri
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:54:30PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote:
> Hi,
> In this case: "packages which install to hardcoded $DESTDIR/usr/sbin,
> but then use %{_sbindir} in %files, will need to be adjusted."
>
> I did this [1] after the make install, is that correct ?
>
> [1]
> %if "%{_
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:10:53PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:46:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Fl
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:46:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > >
> > > > glibc
> > >
> > > If w
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/honggfuzz
I orphaned this one for a few reasons:
- FTBFS with GCC 15 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2340615)
- I don't use it. These days I recommend using AFL++ for fuzzing
(Fedora package: american-fuzzy-lop)
- Upstream is still twitchi
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:06:43AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Суб, 25 сту 2025, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:25:18PM -0300, Rafael Jeffman wrote:
> >>Some of these packages might have the same issue as
> >>softhsm/opendnssec as they use the same user, b
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname
> of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for
> Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to
> have been garbage co
I don't think supply chain security was really mentioned in the thread
yet (apologies if it was - I only scanned it).
There's a real danger that if we forgo responsibility for reviewing
packages to another project, then someone can add a bad package to
that other project and it becomes a problem f
Post quantum, I assume.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 02:07:11PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025, at 9:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Are you a packager?
>
> Yes
>
> What's your FAS ID?
>
> Fed500
Note that the entire virt stack (just about) depends on gluster, so
please coordinate with us if you p
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:48:53AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Just a heads up for OCaml.
> >
> > We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide.
> >
> > OCaml 5.3.0 is e
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:04:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> >>This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> >>maintainer page:
> >>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/P
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 10:32:56AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/4/25 11:33, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >Since the latest update to OpenBLAS 0.3.28 in rawhide, FlexiBLAS
> >fails to build in aarch64 because OpenBLAS crashes in the LAPACK-
> >xeigtstc_cec_in test. Note that OpenBLAS itself does
Thanks, I raised this PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rabbitmq-server/pull-request/10
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plu
I just wanted to raise the visibility of this one as it was filed a
couple of weeks ago by the upstream maintainer and seems serious:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333072
The patch in question was apparently created by John Eckersberg and
added by Peter Lemenkov back in 2014-2016.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> >Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >>And based on my experience, I doubt this particular
> >>provenpackager status was stripped based on something like that.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 03:15:11PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
[...]
I'm a little surprised by Peter's email that he also has little
insight into why this was done. But I have no reason to believe one
person over another in this. I'll just say I've found Peter to be a
very helpful and trusted p
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:33:10PM -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee
> (FESCo) met in a private meeting to discuss whether Fedora contributor
> Peter Robinson should retain his provenpackager privileges. Over the
> last year, multiple priv
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:15:46PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> >
> > Affected packages are:
> > gvfs
> > qemu
>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
>
> Affected packages are:
> gvfs
> qemu
> vlc
> xine-lib
> kodi (RPM Fusion)
> mpd (RPM Fusion)
>
> Affected packagers are all CC'ed.
>
> I have requested a side tag and buil
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the
> following errors:
>
> DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded.
> DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
> DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: p
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:39:46PM +0100, Marián Konček wrote:
> I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the
> name of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have
> "perl", "python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more.
>
> I heard that Java packages for his
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Just a heads up for OCaml.
>
> We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide.
>
> OCaml 5.3.0 is expected to be released at the "end of November or
> beginning of December"[1], so it woul
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:34:08AM +, Barry Scott wrote:
...
> And it shows the "400 - Bad Request" messages.
>
> Following the link to Fedorta infrastructure
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
>
> also ends with the "400 - Bad page".
I get this frequently too. It usually w
ages:
> * ceph (I am the maintainer)
> * gdal (maintainer notified previously)
> * groonga (etc.)
> * myst-nb (etc.)
> * pcp (etc.)
> * root (etc.)
> * python-
> {dask,dask-expr,distributed,formulaic,fsspec,geopandas,pandas,papermill,pyogrio}
> (maintainers not notif
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:02:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Daniel P. Berrangé:
> > >
> > > > I think
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 11. 24 15:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>
> > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it
> > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream
> > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to com
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:54:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to
> > risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!)
&
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to
> risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!)
>
> It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able
I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to
risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!)
It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able to
install many new packages through 'dnf', so filesystem writes are
likely working. I've got a kerne
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 06:30:14PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I missed this thread. Please do feel free to file a bugzilla
> against debugedit for these kind of issues.
>
> On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 14:36 +0100, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > the tcl package build started to fail with
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:55:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:36:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:37:11AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > * gdal (maintainer cc'd)
> >
> > https://koji.fed
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:36:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:37:11AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > * gdal (maintainer cc'd)
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126300702
>
> > * groonga
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:37:11AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> * gdal (maintainer cc'd)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126300702
> * groonga (maintainer cc'd)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126300756
> * myst-nb (maintainer cc'd)
https://koji.fed
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 01:06:42PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> I actually did use --request. I just didn't copy it in the email.
It's alright, I sent the wrong link :-( The correct link is:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=100844&order=-build_id&latest=1
Do you h
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/pull-request/43
Problem: We currently ship qemu on i686, but upstream have stopped
supporting and testing it, and it's also practically rather useless.
So we'd like to eventually remove it. However this has ripple effects
through the virt stack and beyond (
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 07:29:48AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and
> python-pyarrow*.rpm
>
> Updating to Arrow 18.0.0
>
> side-tag f42-build-side-100844 has been created for rebuilding the dependent
> packages:
> * ceph (I am
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:14:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > This is a weird one:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125988419
> >
> > + /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j48 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed
> > 1.55.2-1.fc42 --unique-debug
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 02:36:42PM +0100, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> the tcl package build started to fail with the same error in rawhide [1]:
> /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j4 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed
> 8.6.15-3.fc42 --unique-debug-suffix -8.6.15-3.fc42.x86_64
> --unique-debug-src-base
Just a heads up for OCaml.
We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide.
OCaml 5.3.0 is expected to be released at the "end of November or
beginning of December"[1], so it would make sense to move straight to
this version in Rawhide after that happens.
[1] https://ocaml.org/changelog/2
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 07:50:38AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:35:38PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:16:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > This is a weird one:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fe
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:16:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This is a weird one:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125988419
>
> + /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j48 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed
> 1.55.2-1.fc42 --unique-debug-suffix -1.
This is a weird one:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125988419
+ /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j48 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed
1.55.2-1.fc42 --unique-debug-suffix -1.55.2-1.fc42.x86_64
--unique-debug-src-base libguestfs-1.55.2-1.fc42.x86_64 --run-dwz
--dwz-low-mem-di
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on new
> findings by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that have
> changed in Fedora 42.
>
> TLDR: This report[1] contains 37330 findings. Please
- Forwarded message from "Kanagaraj, Raghavan"
-
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:54:32 +
From: "Kanagaraj, Raghavan"
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" , Wei Fu
Subject: RE: Inactive packagers for the F41 cycle
Hi Richard,
I missed this mail to read. Please don’
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:36:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:26:23AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I seem to remember firefox uses LTO+PGO for speed ups/
> >
> > I wonder if we could provide some rpm macros and packaging guidelines
> > to assist packagers in this
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:45:05PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> It looks like your update has obsoleted quite a number of binutils
> builds - which seems to have been stuck in gating purgatory for a
> while now due to failing gating tests.
I have installed & tested this binutils locally and it
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:45:05PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:06:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Jansson (a JSON library) in Rawhide is out of date compared
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:06:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Jansson (a JSON library) in Rawhide is out of date compared to
> upstream. The latest version in Rawhide is jansson-2.13.1-10.fc42 and
> the latest upstream is 2.14 (released 3 years ago).
>
> I am planning
[So no one else ends up waiting around like an idiot]
Koji 1.35 changed how repositories and side tags and such get rebuilt,
so they no longer get rebuilt on their own. Instead you have to *either*:
fedpkg build --target=... --wait-build=
*or*:
koji wait-repo --build= --request
where the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:02:50PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should:
>
> %ldconfig_scriptlets
>
> be removed from Rawhide spec files now? What about with a parameter,
> like:
>
> %ldconfig_scriptlets lib
Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should:
%ldconfig_scriptlets
be removed from Rawhide spec files now? What about with a parameter,
like:
%ldconfig_scriptlets libs
%ldconfig_scriptlets -n libsmbclient
I can't find any definitive documentation saying it should or
shouldn't be
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:34:43PM +0200, Thomas Haller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 12:06 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Jansson (a JSON library) in Rawhide is out of date compared to
> > upstream. The latest version in Rawhide is jansson-2.13.1-10.fc4
Jansson (a JSON library) in Rawhide is out of date compared to
upstream. The latest version in Rawhide is jansson-2.13.1-10.fc42 and
the latest upstream is 2.14 (released 3 years ago).
I am planning to update this assuming no objections. But the update
isn't completely straightforward as they in
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:36:44PM -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2024 15:39:05 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > NP, I will setup Copr
>
> I am trying to test changes to deal, but I don't know how to tell my
> local mock command to get tcl-devel from your copr. Can you he
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I had a go at 'expect'. Mostly it fails because of the _ANSI_ARGS_
> and TCL_VARARGS macros going away, which are easy, albeit very tedious,
> to fix.
>
> Do you have a source git repo of what we us
I had a go at 'expect'. Mostly it fails because of the _ANSI_ARGS_
and TCL_VARARGS macros going away, which are easy, albeit very tedious,
to fix.
Do you have a source git repo of what we use in Fedora already
(ie. including the patches)?
I notice upstream hasn't had a release since 2018 and is
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > ocaml-labltk
>
> I filed a bug upstream:
>
> https://github.com/garrigue/labltk/issues/27
This one's a bit of a mess, to say the least. I added a comment on
the issue above, but I'll wai
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:12:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to rebase T
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:12:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are s
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
> and bug
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:19 AM Marius Schwarz
> wrote:
> > I checked Koji and there seems no build in process to fix this 0-Day
> > exploitation in firefix
> >
> > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2024-5
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 01:45:30PM +0200, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following systemtap-5.2~pre17277956g0b7f6722-1.fc42 was built in
> Koji yesterday. But it is not propagated to the mirror repository
> servers yet.
>
> systemtap-5.2~pre17277956g0b7f6722-1.fc42
> https://koji.fedo
We wanted to build pesign so we can automatically trigger RISC-V
builds, since for some reason (I guess related to this) it hasn't been
built for f42 & f41. But ...
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124051163
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:26:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:15 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524
> >
> > Howev
My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524
However creating the new branch is a problem:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/67376
"The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."
This is spec
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:20:24AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the
> user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such as cache
> size, frequency, sometimes also the manufacturer and model.
>
>
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 09:54:38PM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 9:40 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
> wrote:
> >
> > > > I can't say I'm proud of this hack but at least, the error message
> > > > shows up to give a clue. I can finally add some error handling to my
> > > > depende
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:43:38PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that have
> been identified
> as inactive have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week
> after the final release,
> packagers who remain in
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 01:09:01PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> With new RPM, I hit the limit in two packages:
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-abrt
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-pg
Is it RPM, or is it "rspec"? Seems to be some sort of Ruby tool.
> I
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 12:40:33AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> root@localhost:~# dnf install kiwi-cli
> ...
>
> root@localhost:~# dnf5 remove kiwi-cli
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem: The operation would result in removing the following
> protected packages: grub2-efi-ia32, grub2
1 - 100 of 2659 matches
Mail list logo
