On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream > > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to commit changes > > into a package we don't directly own as virt maintainers. > > How do you plan to install the new package into the buildroot, so that > it's there when the SRPM is generated? > > (Maybe dynamic build dependencies can be used to solve this without > buildroot preseeding, but seems a bit convoluted.)
For better or worse redhat-rpm-config has Requires on a whole bunch of these *-srpm-macros packages: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/redhat-rpm-config.spec#_94 AIUI that is how the buildroot gets populated. Note that most of these packages are really tiny. Probably their license files & other metadata are multiples of the size of their other content. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
