On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 18:35, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 01. 22 19:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Testing rpm-specs/hibernate-jpa-2.0-api.spec
> > No terminal defined for 'E' at line 1 col 2
> >
> > EPL and BSD
> >
> > What is the problem with this one ?
>
> There is no EPL in https://fedoraproj
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
> FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
>
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
tomcat source it is used. Is it really a
d build system relies on a Java-based
> application server.
>
Well, for whatever reason, upstream fop contains a servlet
implementation (which requires an app server) but we don't even build
or ship this servlet in our fop package.
I removed an unnecessary BR on 'servlet' from the
nerate it
excluding such?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
aintainer for a few years, Greg's article
was well worth the reread. Flatpak has really nailed some of these
points (e.g. targeting all distros with a single build/release
process, binary dependency predictability, etc)... From an ISV
perspective Flatpak is a *mu
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> The new version changes API/ABI
Honestly it would be more noteworthy if guava did NOT break its API/ABI ;-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 11:02, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 06.10.2021 um 07:08 schrieb Michal Srb :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> @Matthew Miller Are you still trying to save Fedora from packaging the ocean?
> :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:49 PM Matthe
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 12:08, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:07 schrieb Mat Booth :
>
> Like many Open Source projects, Fedora is a "do-ocracy“ — ….
>
> A nice phrase with a decent connotation. And it’s true without doubt.
>
> And at the same t
ected you directly or a Java
application you care about is in danger of being removed that would be
a excellent place to start.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:40, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ is not accessible. How do I add a
> contributor to my project?
>
> Appreciate any help on this.
Wow, PkgDb has been gone a long time now :-) Go to:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 00:23, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 23:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
> > >
> > > Any ideas to get it started to fly?
> >
> > The first step should be to empty the group
periodically rebase their stack on Fedora's and have been
pretty good at finding things that I didn't notice had stopped working
such as bootstapping modes that we don't exercise very often for
example. I've made a bunch of changes based on their reports and
merged a bunch of
t (maybe, for someone who has
been using maven years and years and years), but quite tedious.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 17:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536762
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
> > &g
ps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https:/
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 12:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:01:32AM +0100, Mat Booth napsal(a):
> > It would help if the PDC were not so inscrutable.
> >
> > It was my first thought that the branch was EOL, but I had no idea how
> > to look it u
t;
It would help if the PDC were not so inscrutable.
It was my first thought that the branch was EOL, but I had no idea how
to look it up Is there some UI I'm not aware of?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
d to
httpcomponents-client or retired also.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
s of a library (e.g. lucene)
>> > requires changes in Eclipse itself
>>
>> Is this level of backward non-compatibility typical in Java?
>
>
> I would not say in Java overall but in certain projects - YES!
>
>
There appears to be something stuck in my throat
*co
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 09:58, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/08/2021 01:32, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
>
> Bundling is allowed by Fedora's packaging guidelines.
>
Binaries not built fro
t; > achievable with given manpower.
>
> Is it possible to bundle all dependencies into an Eclipse's RPM package?
>
Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel
maintainers of large applications
prefer to distribute via Flatpak.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 10:14, Richard Fearn wrote:
>
> > Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> > not enable the foo-source repositories.
> > That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> > updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on rawhide
have been exceptionally unhelpful, and have
> not substantially contributed to Java packages in Fedora in years.
> Even the Modules that were heralded as "the solution" have stagnated.
> On the other hand, Mat Booth and two members of the DogTag PKI team
> have been really helpful,
-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 13:26, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:44:07PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > > There's a Modularity Improvements Objective draft available[1].
> > >
> >
be the path
of least resistance even though I will once again have to maintain
multiple branches of my whole stack of packages.
Interesting experiment, maybe, but if there's going to be no
commitment to pay the on-going cost of infra maintenance and fix the
design-flaws or whateve
uick glance at tomcatjss package shows it is built by ant with no
sauce/target level specified at all, which means it is built with Java
11 bytecode by default.
You should fix this by rebuilding tomcatjss with Java 8 bytecode.
Here's an example where I fixed the same problem in another package:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> > >
> > > DEBUG util
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> >
> > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'build':
> > DEBUG util.py:621:- Curl error (18): Transf
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now
are thus failing from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this
to FTBF b
in javamail 1.6.3 and later, see:
>
> https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/mail/docs/COMPAT.txt
>
> The maven coordinates are changed, generally javax -> jakarta. This
> also affects the osgi provides.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jie Kang
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:54 AM Mat Booth
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 15:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jie Kang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > javamail ursine is using version 1.5.2 while there are some module
> > streams at 1.6.x
> >
> > The upstream project also moved to the eclipse foundation and these
> > 1.
; > s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes
> > right after x86_64/i686.
>
> even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-)
>
This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java by
quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] installe
t'd be definitely some effort to update...
>
> [1] https://xmlbeans.apache.org/
> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xmlbeans
>
Huh, I thought this project was retired upstream I'm curious what you
need it for
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd like to ask people
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
them synced?
Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system shouldn't have been
commissioned into production before it reached feature
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 13:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following
> packages
> will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching
> (February
> 2020).
>
> Policy:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
> pagure-dist-git on production.
Great stuff. I still don't understand why pkgdb was allowed to go away
before the replacements reached feature
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 11:17, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> I must disagree. That it "works" in RHEL doesn't mean that it should be
done
> in Fedora. The current situation in Fedora, where maven and ant have been
> "moved" to modules has screwed over the Eclipse packagers, for example,
and
> more are
on of
python 3.8. Can you offer any clue how to fix it?
Here is the log, you can see that the cython-based debugging extension when
built against python 3.8 is failing:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5618/37405618/build.log
As a workaround for now, I have disabled the p
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:24, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we
> cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora.
>
> - the current version packaged in fedora is outdated (4.4.1, from Dec.
> 2017, vs. 5.5.1 from July 201
Java SIG? I would
> like to join.
No, it was just a loose association of packagers who wanted to coordinate
work on the Java stack. It's kinda moribund these days, but one or two of
us still hang out in #fedora-java on Freenode. Please also join the
(low-traffic) java-devel mailing list
/message/5UMM5NHS2SR3PCUFLIJGHVZTJQAL722W/
>
> [2]:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EJMYWJ7VILI4RSOUG2R74WJUUT2PTSVD/
Please proceed with the unresponsive maintainer process. By my own
reckoning, he's been AWOL since at least 2017 -- Sinc
jboss-invocation, jboss-marshalling,
> > bean-validation-api, jboss-interceptors-1.1-api, jboss-logging,
> > jboss-remoting-jmx, jandex, jboss-sasl, jboss-vfs, staxmapper, jboss-msc,
> > jboss-common-core, jboss-jms-1.1-api, h2, jboss-connector-1.7-api,
> > jboss-remoting, jboss-
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:14, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
> > rpm macros.
> >
> > Here is the documentation:
> >
my module:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d638a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Mat Booth wrote:
> The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support
> for 32bit arches.
>
> The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches
> upstream for 4.10 (release 2018-12) onwards. I expec
The message about Ceph [1] reminded me that we should probably make the
same notification for Eclipse Platform.
The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support for
32bit arches.
The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches
upstream for 4.10 (r
it
would work on our default windowing system... So I suppose you take
ownership of it at your own peril.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
>
> I'm Fedora user since 2004 and I'm never contribute to a open source
> project before now. I create a pull request for openjfx package (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644712 and
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openjfx).
>
> My sponsor
et him maintain those packages in
the most efficient way he can.
It's not about forcing modules onto users, it's about not forcing more work
than necessary onto already overstretched maintainers.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
de
Hi all,
I orphaned/retired the following low-level Eclipse packages, because they
are no longer needed by the plug-ins I maintain:
eclipse-emf-transaction
eclipse-emf-query
eclipse-emf-validation
eclipse-mdt-ocl
eclipse-mdt-uml2
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
SN5BM5OZG/
>
>
Same for eclipse-xtext-antlr-generator, which was a build dep of
xtext/xpand mentioned above.
I also orphaned eclipse-emf-transaction as it was not needed by any other
Eclipse plugin.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
On 9 July 2018 at 13:36, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> I've just orphaned not-yet-commons-ssl [1]. It is a dependency of
> eclipse-fedorapackager but I'm not sure how useful this dependency still is
> I haven't used it lately. The library has a dependency on
> jakarta-commons-httpclient which has
ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed
contributed parts.)
The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce mailing list
coming year. I don't plan to announce
each change individually so if you are interested in Eclipse Platform or
plug-in licensing, please pay special attention going forward.
Thanks
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-ann
rch
>
>
These individual jackson packages were merged upstream into fewer repos
(and correspondingly fewer source RPMs in Fedora)
jackson-dataformat-{cbor,smile,csv,yaml} and jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
should all be retired.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fed
On 4 October 2017 at 10:15, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:04:16AM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The venerable "recordmydesktop" application does not work with Wayland
> and
> > stopped working out-of-the-box when Wayland w
good
built-in screencast recording functionality.
I plan to retire this package from Fedora shortly.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>
This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
were "0 failed builds" :-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedorap
Note that added topics may be deferred until
> the following meeting.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
I will not be at today's meeting
--
Mat Boot
bscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
Ticket is still has "need info" status -- if the info is provided, the
status should be set to "discuss at next meeting"
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
__
On 15 October 2016 at 13:21, Gerard Ryan wrote:
>
>
I adopted these guys:
- eclipse-webtools
- uddi4j
- wsil4j
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
stead
of replacing them." It is due to the jar:jar goal being executed twice for
the same artifact for some reason. Try eliminating the second invocation
from the pom file of the broken module.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
eclipse-mylyn will be fixed once the right updates land in stable, but I
have no intention to fix eclipse-jbosstools.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pse Launchbar plug-in
> > RPMs: eclipse-launchbar
> > Size: 181382 bytes
> > Size change: -57708 bytes
> > Changelog:
> > * Thu Mar 10 2016 Mat Booth -
> 1:1.0.1-1.gitedd5f69
> > - Take a post-release snapshot of 1.0.1 due to API breakage in new
On 22 February 2016 at 17:38, Corey Sheldon wrote:
>
> Kevin, et al.
>
> I am willing to help with the re-write but admittedly some of it will
require a crash course for me.
>
>
> On 02/22/2016 11:31 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
> M
On 22 February 2016 at 16:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
> Mat Booth wrote:
>
> > Wow, that "HOWTO" is a really old page -- not changed since being
> > imported from the old moin moin wiki. My feeling is that page should
> > be
create an RPM package" page should be updated.
Here is the official guideline:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_2 --
basically, we just got out of the business of keeping track of what the
minimum buildroot contains.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Apologies, I am not able to make it to today's meeting.
--
Mat Booth
http://f
ail: swilker...@nagios.com
> Web:www.nagios.com
>
>
Did you try IRC?
Keiran can usually be found on IRC in the #fedora-uk channel on Freenode,
username "Affix"
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 8 July 2015 at 22:55, wrote:
>
>
> Depending on: mysql-connector-java (288), status change: 2014-05-14 (60
> weeks ago)a
>
This one is fixed.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
ing meeting.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Apologies in advance, in all likelihood I will not be able to make the
meeting this week.
mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I took ownership of netty31 so that I can retire it. I will do so in the
next couple of days unless there is severe objection.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailin
On 24 June 2015 at 00:48, Jan Kurik wrote:
> While npm 2 is a major version number update, it contains little in the
> way of major changes.
>
Why is this worth more than a sentence or two in the release note beats?
You must enjoy the extra bureaucracy :-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedorapr
ng meeting.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Apologies, I will not be able to make it to this week's meeting.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
is in my opinion insufficient guidance for Fedora
> packagers.
>
> Okay thanks, with my releng hat on I had no idea this was coming and would
> have suggested to the FPC to not change anything, at the least giving
> releng a
> heads up saying that they were going to
-hadoop hadoop hbase hibernate hibernate-hql
> hibernate-search hive htrace infinispan oozie parquet-format
> perl-Alien-ROOT perl-SOOT picketbox pig python-elasticsearch
> python-txamqp resteasy root rootplot solr spark thrift wildfly
>
> --
> The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora
> Release Engineering. Please report issues at its trac instance:
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/
> The sources of this script can be found at:
>
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Is anyone from erlang-sig willing to adopt erlang-jsx?
If not, can it be patched out of thrift maybe by dropping the -erlang
subpackage?
Although I am not directly affected as a java-sig person it does concern me
that some random erlang package is affecting so many java packages.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
oject.org/code-of-conduct
>
Package was retired due to lack of maintainership.
No one from Java SIG was interested in keeping it alive any longer -- it
was only here to support VisualVM, IIRC, but that is also now retired.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel maili
.org/fpc,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
> the following meeting.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
> the following meeting.
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
.x86_64
> tzdata-java-2014j-1.fc21.noarch
>
> Does this mean we need to rename all Java subpackages?
>
All language binding sub-packages are named this way, no? (subversion-perl,
plplot-ada, xen-ocaml, etc)
But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
Hi James!
Do you have a link to your package review request?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2.0.5-3.fc21.noarch
> hibernate-osgi-0:4.3.5-2.fc21.noarch
> jetty-osgi-boot-0:9.2.1-1.fc21.noarch
> jetty-osgi-boot-jsp-0:9.2.1-1.fc21.noarch
> jetty-osgi-boot-warurl-0:9.2.1-1.fc21.noarch
> xbean-0:3.17-2.fc21.noarch
>
>
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but AFAICT
On 20 June 2014 12:04, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
>> > On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald > h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> &
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
> > On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
> > &g
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
> > On 20 June 2014 10:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Am 20.06.2014 08:55, schrieb drago01:
> > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:
> how should it do that?
>
> it's imagination that any software knows anything about the internet
> connection
> even 11 years ago with a 56k modem that access was shared for my LAN and so
> the only thing the notebook knew about the inernet was "appears to be slow&qu
On 29 May 2014 14:43, Till Maas wrote:
> eclipse-subclipse orphan,
> kdaniel, swagiaal
>
This affects some of my packages, taking.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
d jdom2 packages in Fedora for this reason. There also used to be a
xml-commons-apis12 compat package (not any more though, we were able to
finally retire it in favour of xml-commons-apis.)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
e.
>
> You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
> lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a
> scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I
> guess it should work (i
che.lucene:lucene-icu)
>
>
solr3 should be retired and dependent packages should be ported to solr4. I
think there is only one package that still requires solr3:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires solr3
hibernate-search-0:4.5.0-1.fc21.noarch
--
Mat Booth
http://fedorapro
On 5 March 2014 10:23, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> На 4.03.2014 20:36, Mat Booth написа:
>
> On 25 February 2014 11:19, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>
>> On 02/25/2014 11:45 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3) Another proposal (sorry don't re
a world".
>
>
Agreed, it seems like busy work to me that adds very little value to anyone
familiar with Java packages. Wouldn't it be easier to change the whatever
tool is generating this report to accommodate for this? "If package invokes
%mvn_build then don't expect ther
bscribing to the java-devel list too :-)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
It is low volume, but it is where most Java-specific things are announced
and discussed.
Regards,
Mat Booth (mbooth)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel
fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conduct<http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct>
>From the README: "The package reports all fail on CheckBuildInMock and
CheckBuildRequires."
I'd rather
n2-common-poms =
> 1.0-50.fc20
>
> This is a BR, I reported it here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887166
> and blocked maven2-common-poms again.
>
>
Deps on maven2-common-poms are redundant, I thought they had all been
removed by now -- sorry about that,
specific
> work. Let's not worry about that right now. What things we do _now_ could
> be
> improved with the investment of some effort?
>
>
>
Here's my favourite bugbear: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/243
I have no idea why the package retirement process nee
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
