On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800 > Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl > > > builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets > > > scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be > > > busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're the slowest > > > > I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as > > well. Do note that we are bringing some more hardware on line after > > the new year, which should give us more armv7 builders. > > > > > builders and there are the fewest of them, except for s390x. > > > > s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes > > right after x86_64/i686. > > even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-) >
This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java by quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] installed, even 32bit arm was quicker than s390x :-o [1] "java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32" -- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22627 -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
