On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29 > pacakges, > > > In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures with straces and reproduce > steps. > In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org. > > Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start of August, we can expect > some indirect dependencies to fail. > > Thoughts? > >
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this: DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build': DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390x/repodata/d901882654dc717c8fc91a6b2f018eeaa538eb6e003b0927bc9ae85895a83786-filelists.xml.gz [transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read] (Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.) When I retriggered the build it succeeded: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681 Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
