On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 PM Mateus Rodrigues Costa <
mateusrodco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mine is the Epson L3150, it is connected to my Wifi network and
>
I have an Epson L3160, I assume it should behave the same as yours. It's
also connected to my local wifi, and printing (and scanning) works
# F41 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker
-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 2
proposed blockers for Final.
Here is a handy l
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 2:43 PM Andre Robatino
wrote:
> As a list administrator for the test-announce list, I received an
> identical message to approve for that list, and when I logged into my
> dashboard and clicked on the message to see the full content, got an error
> something like "This mes
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 7:56 PM Kilian Hanich via devel
wrote:
> Interesting position considering that Windows by default does block
> everything via its Firewall by default. And Windows normally isn't known
> to have great security defaults.
On Windows, you get an interactive popup prompt asking
# Fedora Quality Meeting
# Date: 2024-07-22
# Time: 15:00 UTC ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto )
# Location:
https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org or
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
Greetings testers! It's meeting time again.
Here
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:29 AM Pedro Moura wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on
> fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift.
> This new application uses information from the Fedora Account System to
> find blog
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:30 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> So, if you have a specific use case or workflow, share it with us in
> the form of a user story in this ticket[6], or consider joining the
> ARC team for this investigation.
>
Tomas, the email title and the referenced ticket only talk about "g
> Latest update seems to have fixed it.
That's interesting. It shouldn't be in Fedora yet. I have a Fedora bug
filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268998
and the upstream issue is here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3332
The fix was only merged yesterday ups
That sounds like this Common Issue:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/its-difficult-to-reformat-a-btrfs-partition-subvolume-in-the-installer/89052
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:32 AM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates
>> like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status
>> updates.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:06 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> I noticed that we switched off updates-testing by default for F39
> installs very recently. Is that something that is tied to the release
> date or the final freeze date?
>
There's no exact time defined, but usually this happens shortly
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It might be good to go through all the ones that were hit by this (it
> > wasn't just chrome) and indicate if they are now fixed.
> > You can see a partial list in the common bug:
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a
> new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new
> features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next
> week, we will hav
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> We cannot ship anything from Flathub because
> FESCo will not allow it. I don't *like* this FESCo requirement, but I
> also don't expect that to change.
I haven't studied that ruling, but perhaps the assumption was that said
software is
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:21 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> * An absurd assumption that everyone is new to the Internet, leading to
> lots
> of ridiculous gamified spam "achievements" for basic things such as
> replying
> to a thread, with which you get bothere
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:21 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> I propose that we transition devel list, and eventually most of our
> mailing lists, to Fedora Discussion (our Discourse-powered forum).
>
I've spent more than a decade perfecting my email filters and I have a
setup that works for me very
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:28 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> > I didn't mention this in time to even discuss whether it'd make a good
> > addition to the release notes, but I think users will be happy to see
> > that Fedora 38 Workstation boots faster and uses less baseline memory
> > (measured fro
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:12 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an
> update released once upstream releases patches/updates for the kernel
> issues.
>
Thanks, Jonathan. I was a happy hstr user
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 8:20 AM Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> Panu wrote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878#c126 :
>
> > To me the key points here are
> > 1) there's a lot of obsolete/broken crypto out there
> > 2) we need better error messages
> >
> > Properly dealing with 2) needs
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO.
>
See the link that I posted ;)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there]
>
> on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a
> local key, I have been using for many years):
>
> # rpm -U xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> But, I think it's time to move on. We have ostree and various
> container-delta approaches. We should focus on those — and give DeltaRPMs a
> sad, fond farewell.
>
+1 from me. It will speed up the compose, and I haven't seen a positive
impa
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> One thing I don't see addressed here is how this would impact the release
> criteria. Would it? If so, now's the time to start coordinating with the QA
> team to make those changes.
>
I think we're mostly concerned with the default experience,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:37 PM DJ Chase wrote:
> Providing nonfree packages out of the box ultimately promotes the use of
> that nonfree software, which violates this foundation.
>
It's not out of the box. You have to *opt-in* to third-party repos (which
already contain Steam, Nvidia binary dri
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version
> would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora.
>
Citation needed. Do you mean this sentence?
> Where there are overlaps, Fedora content will be pref
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> # Adjust GNOME Software so that it uses the following priority order
> when deciding which package to offer by default:
> ## Fedora Flatpaks
> ## RPMs
> ## Flathub Flatpaks
>
Thanks for this. That was my concern last time. With my QA hat on, I
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of
> ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not
> from RPM Fusion?
>
I guess the difference could be between a gen
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:46 PM Vojtech Trefny wrote:
> Hi, I am planning to change how we support BIOS RAID (sometimes also
> called Firmware or Fake RAID) in the installer in the future. I plan
> to go through the official Fedora change process for Fedora 38, but
> I'd like to get some feedback
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda.
While that's true, wouldn't it make sense to adjust Anaconda to requi
Hello,
kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might
negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the
developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his
blog posts containing all necessary instructions:
* Part 1: https://
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> There should be new options for resetting the persistent overlay and
> booting with no persistence. The default options should boot with
> persistence and setup of persistence should work.
>
Neal, Matt, what is the rationale for enabling persi
Forwarding a test day announcement from Geoff:
Hello testers!
Just a heads up: the IoT Test Week is occurring now! [0]
Please add your results to the test week page [1] and feel free to chat in
#fedora-test-day on libera.chat.
Note, in case you tried to test earlier in the week and were faced w
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:02 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:30 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
>
>> This is the GNOME version that's we'll be shipping F37 Final with, so
>> please make sure to test it and file issues for things that would need
>&
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:30 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
> This is the GNOME version that's we'll be shipping F37 Final with, so
> please make sure to test it and file issues for things that would need
> fixing before F37 GA. I'd suggest starting upstream at gitlab.gnome.org
> for most issues, and th
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 9:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing clean Windows installation. As long as the Windows
> installation does not have BitLocker enabled, the installer must also
> install a bootloader which can boot
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
> livesys-late initscripts are incorrectly copied onto the system
> or not deleted after they lost their functionality.
>
That's not a bug, that's expected. They shoul
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:43 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> For example, at the top of the page, there's a bunch of numbers. I have no
> idea what they mean.
> Hovering over each of these displays a tooltip - which is nice - but five
> seconds after that tooltip disap
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:32 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, at 4:38 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Currently there is this (insufficient, of course):
>
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/windows-with-encrypted-disks-bitlocker-cant-be-booted-from-the-grub-boot-menu/20
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:52 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> Short term approaches:
>
> - Documentation: GRUB's Windows boot option may not work, how to use
> efibootmgr --bootnext and --bootorder
>
Currently there is this (insufficient, of course):
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/windows-with-encrypte
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:06 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> a. Fix GRUB by giving it the ability to modify UEFI NRAM "bootnext" value,
> so that instead of chainloading the Windows bootloader from GRUB, GRUB will
> modify the system NVRAM such that the next boot (only) will directly boot
> the Windows
Hello testers and developers,
please note that we've set up a new mailing list called test-reports [1]
and we've redirected all automated compose/updates/test/etc reports into
it. These reports were previously sent to the test list and devel list and
created a lot of visual noise among regular con
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Flathub should only be preferred when there is no Fedora Flatpak
> available.
>
> I don't see it in the proposal.
>
I see:
"GNOME Software will prefer Fedora flatpaks over Flathub flatpaks"
What
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 4:50 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> I think we should add this.
>
> However, gnome-initial-setup is a bit late because currently anaconda
> uses hostname to name your btrfs subvolumes. :(
>
> anaconda would perhaps be a better place, but only if it uses hostnamed
> so as to
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about
>
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages
>
> Did you run the command `remove-retired-packages
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:36 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Any more thoughts, comments, adjustments etc? Thanks!
>
Which milestone is this supposed to block? It sounds fine (to my networking
layman ears).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:40 AM Aurelien Bompard <
abomp...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> After spending some time evaluating our options, CPE's Advance
> Reconnaissance Team came up with this proposal for the next version of FMN:
>
> https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fmn/a
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyXorgDriverRemoval
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This change will remove the `xorg-x11-drv-vesa` and
> `xorg-x11-drv-fbdev` driver packages, and associated support code from
> the `xorg-x11-server-Xorg` packag
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 6:14 AM Ian Laurie wrote:
> I've done some playing and it looks like it is the first resize after
> the first login after a boot causes it. After that it doesn't seem to
> happen (or it is very infrequent if it does).
>
I'm quite certain it's this:
https://ask.fedoraproje
Hi Zdenek,
a QA person here. This sounds like it's going to be a major headache for us
(and our users), I hope I'm wrong. I initially skipped your message,
because it was too technical (seemed targeted at system admins, not regular
users) and I don't know half of the printer-related abbreviations a
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:56 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
>
There are some game-related packages (not dependencies) which need to be
installed as i686 so that they can apply to 32bit games. I know of the
following:
* mangoh
w:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 1:37 PM Jeff Fearn wrote:
> On 9/2/2022 20:33, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > initially I (and not just me) read the email as "update to the latest
> > python-bugzilla and you'll be fine". But after I played with
> > bugzilla.stage, and read
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:30 AM Jeff Fearn wrote:
> Tl;dr From Monday 28th February, applications making API calls to
> Bugzilla may no longer authenticate using passwords or supplying API
> keys in call parameters. Instead, API keys must be supplied in the
> Authorization header.
>
> Support for
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:50 PM Maxwell G via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Thu, 2021-09-16 at 15:17 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enabl
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> account system has
> a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> Matrix Ids.
> If you do not qualify them, they are assumed to be for the libera
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've checked the status quo.
>
> Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
> installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is not.
>
> 1. dnf upgarde, no rpm update available: reproducer_reversed is not pulled
> in
> 2.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:30 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > 2. What happens if package P (already installed on the user's system)
> > starts recommending package Q (not installed on the user's system)? Will
> Q
> > get auto-installed together with P's update, or not? I believe it's
> > important t
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:09 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat
> Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short
> version is that the search API now defaults to returning 20 bugs, but
> authenticated calls can request up
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
>
>
> == Summary ==
> exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak
> dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and
> blocks installation of
Hello,
for those of you who use our BlockerBugs app to track release blockers
(e.g. tracked bugs for F35 Beta [1]), there's a new version 1.4.0 deployed
to production.
The most user-visible change in this release is a new purple anchor icon,
which is displayed next to blocker bugs which depend on
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com
> > <https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com> (e.g. for integration testing,
> etc,
> > basically as a staging B
If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com (e.g. for
integration testing, etc, basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please
note that it says:
"This instance of Bugzilla will be shut down permanently on July 31st at
12:30 AM UTC. You should use bugzilla.stage.redhat.com instead"
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:13 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried to contact the people behind "Standard Test interface" CI.
> I sent the e-mail about 3 weeks ago.
> Then after about 2 weeks (= ~1 week ago) I reacted to the same email
> so it would appear in their inboxes again.
>
> Yet no
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:55 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > If I intend to use Matrix exclusively, do I still need to register on
> libera.chat, in order to participate in Fedora rooms?
>
> I think if you want to show up on the IRC side with your expected IRC
> nick (for example, for IRC meetings,
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > Maybe it helps in Element Web, Settings, Preferences, to deactivate
> > "Show join/leave messages (invites/kicks/bans unaffected)"
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but I already had that setting turned off for
> months.
>
> Weirdly enough,
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:11 PM Nick Bebout wrote:
> If you are a Matrix user, we ask for your patience as we get bridges setup
> on the new network. If you were joined to rooms via the generic freenode
> bridge, you will need to leave them and rejoin the fedora rooms in matrix
> (which will be p
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No, I don't think it will ever be "fixed".
> ...
> We have in update pungi config a (IMHO poorly named)
> "multilib_whitelist" variable. We can add packages to this and pungi
> will pull them in, no matter if something depends on them or not.
>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> What are the next steps for unretiring these two packages and
> maintaining them?
>
Hey Nikolay,
thanks for taking care of Fish Fillets, it's a great game (and also from my
country). Here I found the instructions for unretiring a package:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:18 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:24 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
> >
> > If Gnome is still hanging for 2 minutes on reboot [1] then I think we
> may want to consider that a blocking bug for F34. I can at least confirm
> that this bug is still affecting R
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make
> it
> > multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In
> order
> > to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like
> > "Provide
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 26.01.2021 13:24, Honggang LI wrote:
> > What is the rule to concurrently select both x86_64 and i686 build
> > for Fedora X86_64 platform?
>
> Fedora ships only i686 packages for multilib support
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:10 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> For rawhide, and branched (prerelease) yes, changes likely would need to
> be there.
> For updates its the infrastructure ansible repo.
>
Sigh.
So, IMHO, tickets for this should be filed as releng tickets
> and folks should note which they a
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:17 AM Graham White
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
>
> Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been removed from the
> Fedora 33 repositories? This package was there for Fe
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:08 PM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
> Am 18.01.21 um 09:35 schrieb Daniel Mach:
> > DNF 5
> > -
> > * The goal is to remove redundant code and make sure all tools built
> > on top libdnf work the same (DNF currently uses a different code path
> > than microdnf and PackageK
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:33 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 18.01.2021 11:29, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33 nor in
> > Rawhide. Am I looking wrong? Thanks.
>
> You n
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:36 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
> $ dnf offline-upgrade
> $ dnf offline-distrosync
>* New commands to upgrade your system on reboot
>
Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33 nor in Rawhide.
Am I looking wrong? Thanks.
___
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:04 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hello, I already sent this proposal (quoted below) to the test list last
> week. Please read the existing discussion at:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BFN427ECEZTGYCDKHJYH
Cotton. I'm
forwarding it also here to the devel list, to collect more feedback, if
there is any.
Thanks,
Kamil
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kamil Paral
Date: Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:44 PM
Subject: proposal: move Data Corruption criterion from Final to Beta
To: test
I propose we
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 6:26 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> So here's an idea I was thinking about over the RH shutdown: I propose
> we gate stable release critical path updates on the openQA tests.
>
+1, awesome
I'm glad I'm not going to be that person that everybody pokes when
some
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:27 AM Dusty Mabe wrote:
> There are three update streams for Fedora CoreOS. The "stable" stream is
> still
> on Fedora 32 but has been receiving bi-weekly updates and should be
> switched over
> to Fedora 33 soon (probably this week). The `next` and `testing` streams
> ha
As someone who hates IRC with passion (including the necessity of
maintaining a znc instance and dealing with IRC authentication and network
issues from time to time) and would love to jump to a more modern solution
ASAP, what is the best course of action for me now?
- Create an account with some
Hello, the python-mongoquery package is now orphaned, our group doesn't
need it anymore. It doesn't seem to be required by any other package. If
python-mongoquery is useful to you, feel free to take it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mongoquery
Cheers,
Kamil
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
>
> Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
>
> "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
> setup experience. So
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:37 PM Pavel Březina wrote:
> apply-changes only works if you have valid authselect configuration (no
> manual changes) and you edit /etc/authselect/user-nsswitch.conf or one
> of the selected profile template.
>
> If you need to restore previous configuration you can ei
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:03 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
> > If it is, what is the proper way to revert back to upstream defaults
> > in this case? Should I append "--force" to the command? (I don't want
> > to destroy my system, that's why I'm not simply trying it. All of
> > this seems awfull
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:36 am, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov
> > wrote:
> >> # authselect apply-changes
> >> [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov <
mikhail.v.gavri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> # authselect apply-changes
> [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
> [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
> [error] Refusing to activate profile unless thos
Hello everyone,
I'd like to announce a new project of the QA team and an extension of the
BlockerBugs App [1]. The blocker and freeze exception proposals can now not
only be discussed during regular blocker review meetings [2], but also at
any time through discussion tickets hosted on Pagure [3].
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind
> of aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
> metadata being pinned
>
I don't follow. If you have one master copy and 10 snapshots, and yo
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > > incorporatin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:17 AM John Reiser wrote:
> On 2020-09-01 at 12:13 UTC, Kamil Paral wrote:
> [[snip]]
> > I'd like to ... hugely speed up the installation instead
> [[snip]]
>
> Zstd is faster than xz at de-compression, but a much larger speed
&
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:28 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:13:21PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the
> most
> > likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA
>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
> setup experience. So
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:59 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have
> > explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started
> > to bite us
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:57 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:06 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Basic networking
> > >
> > > It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connection
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:25 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd accept the criterion as proposed (because we need it now), and do the
> reorganization later (possibly when this cycle is over and we have more
> time to bikeshed about best criterion layout). I'm fine with either addin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:25 PM Allan Day wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> coreutils currently configures `ls` to use 256 colours rather than 16.
> This is a downstream Fedora change which means that `ls` doesn't
> follow the colour palette that's configured in the terminal.
>
It makes sense to synchronize w
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:47 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> I'm really uncomfortable about the amount of crossp-posting, so I'm
> limiting this to devel@ (I receive it) and test@ (obvious to me why
> relevant).
>
> Kamil Paral writes:
> > Adam writes:
>
&g
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> After discussing this with FESCo last week, this is submitted at a F33
> change since it's largely a paperwork exercise at this point.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTEditionPromotion
>
> = Promote IoT to an Edition =
>
> == Summary
1 - 100 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
