On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Flathub should only be preferred when there is no Fedora Flatpak > available. > > I don't see it in the proposal. > I see: "GNOME Software will prefer Fedora flatpaks over Flathub flatpaks" What is *not* in the proposal and should be added is a clarification whether Fedora RPMs or Flathub flatpaks take precedence, when both exist (and a Fedora flatpak doesn't). My preference would be: Fedora flatpak > Fedora RPM > Flathub or Fedora RPM > Fedora flatpak > Flathub If this is the case, I believe this Change is a great benefit to Fedora. I'd be worried if we prioritized third-party software over our own builds. Yes, the security is better with flatpak over rpm, but there are also other aspects. Like having things under our own control, or having a pretty good pre-release testing processes (updates-testing, bodhi, karma) compared to flathub. On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I would prefer a non-sandboxed app instead of a third-party DEB repack. And nobody is taking that option away from you ;-) You've made your preference known. Repeating it numerous times doesn't contribute to a pleasant discussion.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
