On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 17:35, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 08:56 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Last Wednesday there was a grub2-2.12-24.fc43 update [1] that came in
> that completely broke booting
> > in CoreOS. For whatever reason this same update didn't break testing in
> OpenQ
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 13:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > On 2/15/25 9:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:31 -0500
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 20:51, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-02-15 at 14:54 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:31 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > > > IMO the bar would only need to be th
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 02:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:15:16PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/13/25 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I agree with downthread folks that that seems like way too high a
> > > failure rate to enable gating on. However, a few questio
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 21:46, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 11:46 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > If with all of this a critical update
> > is still blocked because of a false positive, it is fairly easy to waive
> > the test in Bodhi (
> >
> https:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 17:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I agree with downthread folks that that seems like way too high a
> failure rate to enable gating on. However, a few questions if I can:
>
Yes the failure rate is quite high and most of these are real failures,
that we deal with in Fedora CoreOS
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:32 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 13:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
>
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 13:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:13, Dan Horák wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:32:06 +0100
> >> Clement Ve
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:13, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:32:06 +0100
> Clement Verna wrote:
>
> > cross posting from
> >
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gating-fedora-updates-on-fedora-coreos-ci/144566
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
>
cross posting from
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gating-fedora-updates-on-fedora-coreos-ci/144566
Hi all,
Last year, the Fedora CoreOS working group implemented CI testing [1] for
Bodhi updates on a set of critical packages [2]. Automatic updates are a
key feature of Fedora CoreOS, and t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:55, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> This looks like a bug in bodhi.
>
> the web UI lists correct releases pending and current.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Fedora 39 stopped showing in pending releases (and is not in current
> > eithe
On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 11:37, Leon Fauster via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Am 15.09.23 um 07:43 schrieb Clement Verna:
>
> > At the risk of being controversial and a voice of the minority, I think
> > using GitHub would be beneficial for the Fed
OOn Thu, 14 Sept 2023, 18:01 Adam Williamson,
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:50 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam W
Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 merges,
the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-)
Thanks for flagging this up.
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 16:37, Ron Olson wrote:
> Yep, that worked, thanks!
>
> For folks searching similar info later, I ran:
>
> doc
I think it's worth to mention that many layered container images are
published directly on the Fedora's Quay.io organisation (
https://quay.io/organization/fedora).
The builds are not happening in OSBS or the Fedora infrastructure but IIRC
it's a GitHub Action that does the build and pushes the con
On Tue, 9 May 2023, 17:51 Kevin Fenzi, wrote:
> Just a general answer/info here at the bottom of the thread...
>
> I realize our container build pipeline is not great, but it's currently
> working and I will keep it working until we replace it.
>
> I agree we should replace it, and there's lots o
On Tue, 9 May 2023, 15:42 Debarshi Ray via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hey Clement,
>
> On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:45 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 22:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 08, 2023
On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 22:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > Let's say we:
> > > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building this
This is fixed now, happy containering :-D
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 13:55, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:02 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > There is a BZ to track this too
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151833
> >
> >
There is a BZ to track this too
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151833
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 10:50, Clement Verna wrote:
> The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
> images are pushed to the registry everyday that probably explain why you
&
The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
images are pushed to the registry everyday that probably explain why you
can't pull rawhide images on non aarch64 arch.
I ll try to look at why we did not have the other arches builds.
[1] - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
Thanks to everyone that answered the survey. I shared a short summary of
the results
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-coreos-survey/34408/2
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 12:52, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Fedora CoreOS Working Group [1] is looking to get feedback on how w
Hi,
The Fedora CoreOS Working Group [1] is looking to get feedback on how we
share our progress with the rest of the Community. The goal being to help
us understand which communication channel works best and also gather ideas
about things we could try.
Here is a link to our very short survey wher
ducing-fedora-coreos/
> On 20 May 2021, at 2:24, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:48, Joe Doss wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
>> > wrote:
>> >> I think this is the fundamental difference here, Fedora CoreOS
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 10:00, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 05. 21 v 8:54 Clement Verna napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> &g
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:48, Joe Doss wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
> > wrote:
> >> I think this is the fundamental difference here, Fedora CoreOS does
> >> not have a version number. It has 3 streams, stable, testing and
> >> next,
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >>
> >> Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 12:28, Peter Oliver wrote:
> > IMHO even then we would need the default "fedora" image to be the
> > minimal one, as that's what a casual user will compare, unless they
> > happen to know "fedora-minimal" exists.
>
> I notice that fedora-minimal is absent from Docker Hub, a
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 09:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6].
>
> Are the count stats visible somewhere?
>
For FCOS this change is not yet enabled, it is coming in a few months (mor
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 16:40, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > The container runtime in the host OS will have configured most mount
> > points before the container starts. It would be relatively uncommon
> > for processes inside the container image to need to mount addi
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 12:06, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
> > shadow-utils) from the Con
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a):
> > Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based
> > Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream.
> >
> > - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 14:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:38 PM Tomasz Torcz
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:38 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > Dnia Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:12:47PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher napisał(a):
> > > Since I figured it might be useful to others, I have made it available
> > > publicly. See the Mark
.. snip ...
>
> Based on the feedback received, I will update the change proposal to
> exclude shadow-utils from the packages proposed to be removed. That way we
> should be able to move on and at least remove sssd-client and util-linux ;-)
>
I have updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 12:58, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:36 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:23 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:30, Daniel Walsh wr
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:30, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a):
> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Unless Op
... snip ...
>
> The only one of these I have a major problem with removing is
> shadow-utils. Without those tools, it's impossible to create and
> modify users, and that's an extremely common pattern for containers. I
> also don't think freeing 4MB on the unpacked rootfs is much of a gain
> for t
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-24/fesco.2021-02-24-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-24/fesco.2021-02-24-15.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-24/fesco.2021-02-24-15.00.log
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-02-24 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues t
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:04, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 13:46, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Recordings are available on Fedora's youtube channel
> >
> > Growing Fedora CoreOS Community :
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 18:53, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Before the RH holiday shutdown, I started a new project designed to
> address a long-standing pain point in Fedora: we don't really have a
> good source of truth for release cycle information. I'm thinking of
> situations where
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 15:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:34:58PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 14:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 a
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 14:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 05:27:54PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are going to hold a virtual meetup this Thursday (2021-02-04) . The
> > meetup will cover 2 topics
> >
>
Hi all,
We are going to hold a virtual meetup this Thursday (2021-02-04) . The
meetup will cover 2 topics
* Growing Fedora CoreOS Community - from 15:00 to 15:50 UTC [0]
and
* Fedora CoreOS as an Official Edition - from 16:00 to 16:50 UTC [1]
The goal is to have an open discussion and come up w
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 00:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:04:42PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:43:35PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:39 PM Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 1/21/21 1:27 P
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:12, Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Mark O'Brien"
> > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:44:14 AM
> > Subject: AArch64 support for container and flatpa
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-12-09)
=
Meeting started by cverna at 15:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-12-09/fesco.2020-12-09-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting sum
Sorry for sending this late :)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 onirc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-12-09 15:0
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:42, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > > I think if we don't want to accept a different
> > > > philosophy about release schedule and release engineering we can
> > just
&g
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
> [big snip]
>
> > To the outside
> > > world, there is a strong impression that the thing called "Fedora" is a
> > > product o
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:01, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]
> pin...@pingoured.fr>
> >wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 21:22, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 19:42 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > CoreOS is going to be the same only worse, because it's not even built
> > > the same way as the rest of Fedora. It's not built by Pun
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > This Cha
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 19:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:22 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > So to boil this down into a representative question: when we are doing
> > the Fedora 34 Go/No-Go meeting in ~four months' time, how do we decide
> > whether to release "Fedora CoreO
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 18:27, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > == How To Test ==
> > See QA test cases :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases
> >
> > We also have regular tests days, for example
> > https://fedoramagazine.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:31, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:11 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > I would highly recommend not creating message consumers that rely on
> > > any particular message ordering because they're not going to work
> > > properly, GitLab or not.
> >
>
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:30, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I hope you enjoyed the F33 release party this weekend! Getting back to
> > the GitLab topic mail threads, this weeks topic from the GitLab AMA
> > session on Se
Works for me
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 09:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > PROP
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> >>
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early
> > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it.
>
> I except (and accept) that most of the development work
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> this is the informational message, no action required.
>
> Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to
> switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide.
>
> Though ELN is defined as the buil
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:01 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > Since there are no open tickets that are tagged with "meeting" and no new
> > tickets are in need of synchronous discussion IMO, I propose to cancel
> > tomorrow's meeting, and woul
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney
&
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:34, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 12/10/20 19:54, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> >
> >> Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DHLKVLQV2IIB3AGURZ
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney
> wrote:
> > GitLab
> > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for
> > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your
> > attendance on the day
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-16/fesco.2020-09-16-14.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-16/fesco.2020-09-16-14.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-16/fesco.2020-09-16-14.00.log
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-09-16 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 10:30, Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
>
>
> 20/9/4 17:27(e)an, Aoife Moloney igorleak idatzi zuen:
>
> >
> > - A discussion on forum.gitlab.com at:
> >
> https://forum.gitlab.com/t/fedora-migration-to-gitlab-ask-me-anything-ama-thursday-september-10-2020/41971
> >
>
> Er, The T
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 19:19, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have a docker recipe that does not much more than:
> > >
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> I have a docker recipe that does not much more than:
>
> FROM fedora:rawhide
> RUN dnf -y install ...blah...
>
>
Long story short the docker hub requires a PR to a github repo to update
the image, this PR is reviewed and merged by a p
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 01:08, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 18:46 -0400, Chris wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm going through the typical routine of pushing my repository up to EPEL
> > (fc33, fc32, fc31, and epel8)... all goes smoothly until this command:
> >
> > fedpkg update --
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-07-01 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 16:55, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> > The blank pages are flatpaks. We are using the same registry for
> containers and flatpaks and the upstream project[0] used for registry.fp.o
> does not support flatpaks so the page is just blank.
>
> That can't be right, fedora-minimal i
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 12:59, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> > > microdnf reinstall tzdata
> >
> > There's a bug about this to split out the UTC tzdata into a minimal
> > tzdata so terrible hacks aren't needed to slim things down.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722233
>
> I'll C
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:32, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
> >> (https://github.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:24, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployme
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from
5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes)
One high level feature worth noting :
* you can now associate BZ ticket
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 18:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:55:21AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just
> > appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as
> > transitioning from pending to te
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
... snip
>
>
> The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at
> this point.
>
This is now fixed so you should be able to vote :-).
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Charalampos Stratakis
> Software Engineer
> Python Mainten
Hi all,
I have just orphaned python-tgext-crud[0], as far as I can tell this
package is not a dependency of any other package.
$ sudo repoquery --whatdepends python3-tgext-crud
There are currently 2 open bz for it [1]
[0] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud
[1] -
https://bugz
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 05. 20 9:12, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > There is
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python
> Classroom Lab:
>
>https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom
>
> I need help with two main issues:
>
>
> 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32:
>
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 02:28, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python
> Classroom Lab:
> >
> >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom
> >
> > I need help wi
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 08:38, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Something seems wrong in: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pyproj
> The header text and upstream point to pyproject-rpm-macros in stead of
> pyproj.
> Does anybody know how to fix this?
>
That application has been in a bad shape for a whi
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:55, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:03, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney
>> wrote:
>> > ## GitForge Updates
>> > * We are tracking our progress
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:03, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney
> wrote:
> > ## GitForge Updates
> > * We are tracking our progress here (nothing new added yet, fyi)
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update
> > * And the council are tracking the c
On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 21:42, clime wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 19:42, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > # CPE Weekly: 2020-05-02
> > ---
> > title: CPE Weekly status email
> > tags: CPE Weekly, email
> > ---
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Background:
> > The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Ha
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:41, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Almost a week ago, I built cmpfit and fityk in side tags on F31, F32
> and F33. While the builds for F33 moved directly to stable - as
> expected - the other two got stuck for 4 days. I noticed that I
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones
>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> > You need to edit the update and remove these builds. You can click on t
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:53:38AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up.
>
> Wouldn't the lower NVR builds simply be ignored?
>
The merging a side tag is not considering NVRs
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
> builds that it's complaining about in the update.
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991
Answered in the ticket, but I think Bodhi is behaving correctly there
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 14:57, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
>
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 22:33, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 21:58 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>
> [evolution is still crashing. sigh. such is life. apologies for
> formatting, again]
>
> > > So yeah, let's discount the releng folks first, because
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 20:49, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:52 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
> [up front: apologies for any weird formatting in this email, Evolution
> is crashing on me like crazy while I try to edit it, so I'm sending it
> from Roundcube which I don't normally
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>> >There is also an historical taste to write in house applications
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
