The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
images are pushed to the registry everyday that probably explain why you
can't pull rawhide images on non aarch64 arch.

I ll try to look at why we did not have the other arches builds.

[1] - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2097508


On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:40, Jun Aruga (he / him) <jar...@redhat.com> wrote:

> I am trying to pull the fedora rawhide image from
> https://registry.fedoraproject.org/ .
>
> First, the URL below to print available tags is empty on my browser.
> https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/
>
> But I was able to see the available tags by skopeo. And the "rawhide"
> tag is included.
>
> ```
> $ rpm -q skopeo
> skopeo-1.10.0-3.fc37.x86_64
>
> $ skopeo list-tags docker://registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora
> {
>     "Repository": "registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora",
>     "Tags": [
>         "34-aarch64",
>         "34-ppc64le",
>         "34-x86_64",
>         "34",
>         "34-s390x",
>         "34-armhfp",
>         "33-armhfp",
>         "32-armhfp",
>         "35-aarch64",
>         "35-ppc64le",
>         "35-s390x",
>         "35-x86_64",
>         "35",
>         "35-armhfp",
>         "36-aarch64",
>         "36-armhfp",
>         "36-ppc64le",
>         "36-s390x",
>         "36-x86_64",
>         "30-aarch64",
>         "30-ppc64le",
>         "30-s390x",
>         "30-x86_64",
>         "30",
>         "latest",
>         "rawhide",
>         "30-armhfp",
>         "36",
>         "31-aarch64",
>         "31-x86_64",
>         "31",
>         "31-armhfp",
>         "31-s390x",
>         "31-ppc64le",
>         "32-aarch64",
>         "32-ppc64le",
>         "32-s390x",
>         "32-x86_64",
>         "32",
>         "33-aarch64",
>         "33-ppc64le",
>         "33-s390x",
>         "33-x86_64",
>         "33",
>         "37-aarch64",
>         "37-ppc64le",
>         "37-s390x",
>         "37-x86_64",
>         "37",
>         "38-aarch64",
>         "38-ppc64le",
>         "38-s390x",
>         "38-x86_64",
>         "38"
>     ]
> }
> ```
>
> However I failed to pull the fedora:rawhide, while I was able to pull
> the fedora:latest. Do you know what's wrong? Thanks.
>
> ```
> $ rpm -q podman
> podman-4.3.1-1.fc37.x86_64
>
> $ podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora
> Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest...
> Getting image source signatures
> Copying blob 2a0fc6bf62e1 done
> Copying config 9538a60368 done
> Writing manifest to image destination
> Storing signatures
> 9538a60368f65b52c44a612bbe694a0bfdeb57f081dee4f9888fe7825c6488b9
>
> $ podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
> Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide...
> Error: choosing an image from manifest list
> docker://registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide: no image found in
> manifest list for architecture amd64, variant "", OS linux
> ```
>
> --
> Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic
> See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for
> the timezone.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to