Re: Help wanted - Potentially broken use of sysusers.d in systemtap package

Ah, that helps! I see now. The nested `if` statements had thrown me off. I missed the fact it's the %{with_sysusers} check that's falling back to the oldschool method of directly using user creation commands if not satisfied. I'd been reading it as if it fell back to that method if the version c

Help wanted - Potentially broken use of sysusers.d in systemtap package

Hi, I'm currently trying to work on fixing a bug which arises when attempting to layer the `systemtap-runtime` package on a Fedora Atomic distro. I think this is fairly high priority since this package is pulled in as a dependency of `qemu`, which is probably fairly commonly used. Fedora Atomi

Re: xz backdoor

Just to be clear, as I was getting ready to put 40 Beta on a test machine, this has been fixed. I do the install and run updates and the compromised version of xz is never installed? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

s just isn't as simple or straightforward as you seem to want it to be. Erecting financial barriers to contribution is dangerous, and has unintended consequences. Respectfully, Alex Perez Jonathan Wright via devel wrote on 9/6/22 2:14 PM: > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:10:17 +0100 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 10/03/2022 13:47, Alex wrote: > > Here a example test. I know that this could be also done with https but > > it's a understandable example, IMHO. > > Better example: > openssl s_client -conn

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:41:15 + Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100 > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote: > > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal > > > for debugging

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

17/2017-03-18_02_Aleksandar_Lazic_curl_for_network_debugging.mp4 May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for debugging purposes. Best regards Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Intent to orphan JDK Mission Control

/almac/jmc8/) and a repo for snapshot builds (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/almac/jmc-snapshot/). Regards, Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Self introduction

Hello everyone,My name is Alexey Gorgurov, and I would like to participate in the community life.I'm experienced mainly in C++, Qt, .net, python, etc., interested in Linux and have some experience in open source contributing.I like to help people with programming issues and like to spend some time

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

Daniel Pocock wrote on 2/22/21 10:41 AM: > I feel that you underestimate the impact of the GPU driver issue > > If the GPU driver doesn't work, people can't even log in and get started > > If the GPU vendors don't test their code on ppc64le (and aarch64) then > those platforms will always lag beh

Non-responsive maintainer callkalpa - FESCO issue #2580 - request for exception

s person no longer has the time to dedicate to making sure these packages are usable. Kalpa is listed as a Fedora Ambassador for Sri Lanka, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Callkalpa. Thank you for your consideration. Alex Perez

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

they have to compile their own kernels or >> obtain custom kernels from another user. > >   Or just fix the GPU drivers. They're open source, after all. The GPUs also have firmware blobs OK I think we need to back up a whole bunch here and talk directly about what is wanted a

Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

Hi folks,   I've opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574 [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574] to facilitate assumption ownership of the Sugar packages in Fedora, most of which are de-facto abandoned by the previous maintainer, erikos, who has not authenticated with his FAS account since March

Re: Retiring ntp

Question : I know that FreeIPA at one point did not work well with chrony and required the installation of ntp. This might cause an issue. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:36 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > So, use "chrony" instead? > > For som

Fedora 33 Beta Secure boot issue

Thought I would try the beta out on my laptop again (had tried it on test week, but had to revert due to platform.io not working) Getting error of : " Secure Boot Image failed to verify with * ACCESS DENIED* " It worked on the btrfs test week, so I am unsure what went wrong. Laptop is Lenovo T44

Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

with you IRC or perhaps email. As a maintainer, this would've made the late FIPS changes much more palatable. I've opened the following BZ for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871988 - Alex > > Simo. > > > Christopher > > > > >

Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:55:51 AM > Subject: Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update? > > On Thu

Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , asch...@redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:55:17 AM > Subject: Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update? > > On Thu

Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

I'm bumping this thread. This is still broken. - Original Message - > From: "Alex Scheel" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 2:36:40 PM > Subject: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem upda

Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

ow to ship a container-friendly filesystem package. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708249 And I'm sure many other discussions. - Alex ___ devel mailing lis

Re: [pam_radius] aarch64 GCC failures during ./configure's working compiler step?

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Čermák" > To: "Alex Scheel" , "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 8:25:27 AM > Subject: Re: [pam_radius] aarch64 GCC failures during ./configure's working &

[pam_radius] aarch64 GCC failures during ./configure's working compiler step?

igure script is admittedly from 7 years ago, perhaps I should just nuke it and rebuild it from configure.ac with a newer version of autotools? https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/pam_radius/blob/release_1_4_0/configure Any thoughts? Should I try and grab the config.log from a scratch build? Than

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

Ok thought I had read somewhere that is was in the pipeline but had not merged. Must be old data. On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:24 PM Alex Thomas wrote: > > > > Question about systemd-boot vs GRUB2. > > One of the current

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

Question about systemd-boot vs GRUB2. One of the current stumbling blocks is the lack of LUKS2 support in GRUB2. Does sytemd-boot support LUKS2? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo

Re: rawhide - glibc/pthreads/... - broken pending mass rebuild?

Just to revisit this, my issue turned out to be a bug in a p11-kit component, opencryptoki, that failed to lock, causing its deinitialization routine to trample some stuff. That's been fixed now. Sorry for blaming glibc, Florian! :) - Alex - Original Message - > From: &quo

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

Dogtag, and Libreoffice) on Java 11 and then we'll let the rest drop. IIRC most of the 200 packages not building in our COPR aren't pulled in by Dogtag so we're mostly fine once we fix our top-level Dogtag package. - Alex > > Fabio > _

rawhide - glibc/pthreads/... - broken pending mass rebuild?

gtagpki/issue/3181#comment-661911 And others. They don't reproduce consistently though. Should I go ahead and file a bug or just wait and be patient? :) This is blocking some rebuilds on rawhide at the moment for us. - Alex ___ devel mai

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

pages. Then it'd be: https://.github.io// -- which you'll find somewhere in the https://github.com// repo (either docs/ folder in the default branch or gh-pages branch). https://help.github.com/en/github/working-with-github-pages/about-github-pages - Alex > >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:31 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 23:21, Alex Thomas wrote: >> >> Once question, are we looking at using a layout like openSUSE is >> doing? ( https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:BTRFS ) utilizing subvolumes, or >> ar

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

Ok, I thought I saw a proposal by you to change the default btrfs layout to something like openSUSE's using subvolumes, but now, of course, I cannot find it. On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:25 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:11 PM Alex Thomas wrote: > > > >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

Once question, are we looking at using a layout like openSUSE is doing? ( https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:BTRFS ) utilizing subvolumes, or are we looking at something like /boot/efi > EFI (FAT32) / > btrfs On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:45 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:22:07PM

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

- Original Message - > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 5:58:28 AM > Subject: Re: RHEL 9 and modularity > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:28:58AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 18. 06. 20 v 21:40 Stephen Ga

glassfish-hk2 - orphaning event notification

whatever reason, feel free to adopt it and claim ownership. However, the Stewardship SIG no longer has use for this package and thus orphaned it. Thanks, Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 9:44:33 AM > Subject: Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:34 PM Alex Scheel wrote: > >

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

theoretically possible? :-) But it might allow us to skip incremental bootstrap from a really old gradle version and might even get us a process which works for future bootstraps. - Alex > > Fabio > > > > > > > Felix > > >

Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 11:52:24 AM > Subject: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy > > During today's FESCo meeting, we encountered an unusual voting > situation for the first time

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

Just wanted to follow up and say thanks for this! Much appreciated; I've given it karma. :) - Alex - Original Message - > From: "Florian Müllner" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Florian Muellner" > Sent:

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

Ah cool, so my guess was correct. :-) We're working on fixing this upstream and then we'll get it pulled into Fedora. Mind if we ping you for a rebuild when we're ready? - Alex - Original Message - > From: judov...@email.cz > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > S

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

\o Hey Jiri, I don't see two of our packages in the copr: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pki-core/ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dogtag-pki/ Is there a way to know why they were excluded? Thanks! - Alex - Original Message - > From: "Jiri Vanek"

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

Just a curious observation/question. Backports can often be time > > > consuming and expensive. Is there something preventing you from > > > upgrading to Fedora 32? > > > > I don't know about Alex, but in general, upgrading can also be time > > That's wh

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

Let's try this with the right Florian... Sorry! - Original Message - > From: "Alex Scheel" > To: "Florian Weimer" > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 4:02:48 PM > Subject

Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

uest since March. Thanks, - Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guideli

Re: Modularity Survey

rity Survey > > On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 08:41 -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > > There's a marketing piece from 2017 that alleges that none of gsuite > > (including their gmail for gsuite!) gets scanned for ads: > > > > https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/g

Re: Modularity Survey

8, 2020 4:25:55 AM > Subject: Re: Modularity Survey > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:22 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 13:12 -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > I'm sure we can trust that Red Hat did its > > > > > > due diligence an

Re: Modularity Survey

is wrong and are trying their best to fix it. Part of that is collecting data and stories from people. If we, as a community, push them away now, we'll never see any much-needed improvements to modularity. And tbh, I'm not even sure we're in a plac

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

- Original Message - > From: "Till Maas" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:39:49 PM > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: &g

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

- Original Message - > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 11:02:52 AM > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > Watching the discussion in the other big thread, I feel it has become > rat

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:57:40 AM > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > Le

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

on how you count. That says that FESCo elections are ~5x more participated in than these mailing list discussions, and are a much more representative sample of all our (active?) packagers. I'm not sure if FESCo votes count as packager activity in the above graphs; I'm guessing not. My

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:10:56 AM > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > Le

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:28:15 AM > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > On 06. 04. 20 14:19, Alex Scheel wrote: > > That part isn't actually clear t

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

of arguing and decided to mostly quit arguing versus continuing to participate in this thread. It'd be interesting to see if the FESCo election system could be repurposed to get a sense of all packagers' opinions, rather than make assumptions on how the community as a whole feels based on a

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

s filed against it for many years. Where have all these contributors been? Are those of us who really dislike Pagure's workflows in the minority? Or are others more prone to put up with it because it is free, open source software? IMO, it seems like an ideological argument, not a sound techni

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

- Original Message - > From: "Neal Gompa" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Alex Scheel" , "Leigh Griffin" > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:30:20 PM > Subject: Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly:

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

cedure would be nice, but you'd still need a ticket for unretiring dead packages, which is where I've hit the most problems/delays. But as long as I can continue to work from the command line, I don't really care what the WebUI is as long as it works and isn't too slow. My 2c.

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

And to be clear: there's a difference between a Fedora-sponsored Development forge and a new git forge for dist-git. A lot of this discussion has conflated these two cases. I mostly care about it releasing the former role (pagure.io) and don't care much about the latter role (s.fp.o).

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

- Original Message - > From: "Andrew Haley" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Alex Scheel" > Cc: "Omair Majid" > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:36:23 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

orks fine on OpenJDK 8. IMO, this makes it a JDK11 bug. And not the type we have time to debug and figure out what broke in OpenJDK. With the introduction of JSS's SSLEngine, we can work around this problem, but that isn't yet merged. https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/pull/150 My 2c.,

Java Packaging Guidelines - .so in JARs?

.so-in-JAR is that the JAR always knows where to find the .so, even if the user installs multiple versions of the same package, or, worse, copies JARs from different systems around. Wondering what the community's thoughts are, Alex ___ devel mailing

Re: Non-Responsive Maintainer Check for jsmith

Thanks! Non-responsive maintainer check canceled from my perspective. - Original Message - > From: "Jared Smith" > To: "Alex Scheel" > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:14:11 AM >

Non-Responsive Maintainer Check for jsmith

lla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618564 Thanks, Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c

nodejs-babel-runtime - orphan?

-runtime) < 0.11) needed by nodejs-babel-runtime-6.23.0-6.fc31.noarch This has been a known issue for quite some time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618564 Do you still have cycles to maintain nodejs-babel-runtime, or should it be orphaned? Th

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

Haley wrote: > > > > On 1/27/20 3:13 PM, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > N.B.: I'd like to thank the Red Hat JVM team for being solid in > > > their Fedora execution. But they maintain only the JVM, and not > > > the rest of the Java ecosystem. :-) > &

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

atters) who need them in other packages. Concretely, if you'd like to see more JBoss packages, join us in the Stewardship SIG and collaborate to revive the ones you care about. :-) - Alex N.B.: I'd like to thank the Red Hat JVM team for

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

- Original Message - > From: "Michael Catanzaro" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 4:31:47 PM > Subject: Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Neal Gompa wrote: > > And any di

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

ext around the diff (Diff, diff, diff?) - Workflow on reviewing PRs is sub-optimal compared to most other forges. - Pagure is often slower than GitLab for me. YMMV. - ... For a period of time, IDM tried using Pagure for FreeIPA development. They filed a huge number of issues. N

Re: Fedora 31: dnf upgrade suddenly enables modular streams for protobuf

rpe.fedorapeople.org/stewardship-sig-stats.html But check our list of pending PRs first: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/stewardship-sig-prs.html Feel free to join #fedora-stewardship on Freenode if you're interested in helping out but don't know where to start. - Alex

Re: [fedora-java] What's the State of the Java SIG?

ll be able to continue. Being brutally honest, Fabio does a LOT of work. We need a long term solution that doesn't leave all our ursine packages broken. Regardless of whether they're part of Fedora, existing only hidden, private networks of universities and corporations, or lurking in s

Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

d you to reconsider that choice because we needed these as runtime dependencies, not build-time only. You declined and said our choices were to maintain our own modular forks or maintain the ursine variety. So, here we are. And now, you're telling us to switch to modules? But that doesn't

Re: What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular packages?

y and vastly increase technical debt in the long run, which we do really need to avoid to have a healthy community. Default modular streams shadowing non-modular packages is one such problem, especially when they ship libraries. My 2c. - Alex ___ de

Re: Modularity and all the things

manages for us. So far, ursine packages have been our solution and we've helped with maintaining the stack as community members and giving back. That benefits all of Fedora. I think we've accomplished something useful with the Stewardship SIG. So sure, we don&#

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

d=1735947 needs to be closed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18722 Not going to check the rest of the components, but I think Miro's scripts work fine. It is the bugs that are out of date... ...and if they're out of date, not much Miro's scr

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

- Original Message - > From: "Ralf Corsepius" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:32:03 AM > Subject: Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread > > On 11/5/19 9:41 PM, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > IMO, without a

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Kofler" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 7:48:47 PM > Subject: Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread > > Alex Scheel wrote: > > Special care needs to be taken to make sure

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

does the _maintainer_ change module streams of a dependent module? (module a -dep-> module b -- change stream of b from 1 to 2) IMO, without a resolution in Fedora we'll never get one in RHEL. - Alex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: Java Package Orphanings

The deed has been done. - A - Original Message - > From: "Alex Scheel" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 9:21:35 AM > Subject: Java Package Orphanings > > All, > > In the proce

Java Package Orphanings

) - netty3 (cc: lef, jerboaa) - picketbox (cc: lef, gil) - picketbox-commons (cc: lef, gil) - picketbox-xacml (cc: lef, gil) - rxjava (cc: rfenkhuber) - simple I intend to orphan them all on Friday unless someone else wants these packages. Thanks, - Alex

Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

you're building with JDK11? Or are you only building the maven and ant packages with JDK 11 (and not building all libraries in the module with JDK 11)? Thanks, - Alex > > -- > Mikolaj Izdebski > > ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Re: Unretire recordmydesktop

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 12:59:40PM +0100, Felipe Borges wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:19 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > > On 11/6/18 6:21 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > > > Samuel Sieb píše v Po 05. 11. 2018 v 17:07 -0800: > > > >

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > The fact is, the world has moved away from quoted mail with inline replies. > Top posting rules basically everywhere except hold-out old-school mailing > lists. Gmail, both on the web and _especially_ on mobile, makes it almost > impossible

Any idea what is going on with Epson's printer driver (escpr vs escpr2)?

t, I expect all escpr2 PPDs to work, but what happens when Epson makes new protocol additions that they wish not to disclose? What is the future of using an Epson printer with Linux, and Fedora? Alex [1] https://www.google.com/patents/US9110613 ___

Re: Review Swap

I take review as swap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089 On 6 December 2016 at 19:18, Greg Hellings wrote: > I'm looking to get a review on this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947 > > I'm willing to swap with someone if needed. > > --Greg > > _

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

+1 to the idea that we really do not know how many programs will be affected by this change. We do know that the tmux folks have shot down making any changes to accommodate systemd. As they value cross-platform compatibility, this is understandable. As it looks from my vantage point, the

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi Alex, Hi Till, > the changes were not unrelated but fixed the build error for pulseview > on Rawhide and extending the build overrides fixed the build errors on > F23 (which you can also read in the changelog). I noticed the

Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

the process where I left it off. Alex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

I am new to package maintaining, but Alteeve's Niche uses Shorewall in one of our offerings, and I'd be happy to take it on. Our tech lead is available to assist as well. Thank you for all of your work on the package! -- Alex Bruneau Technician, Alteeve's Niche! Inc. 145 Front S

Re: Kernel 4.2.3-200 stability problems and mouse cursor defects...

Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade to Fedora 23 Workstation, so I no longer have access to that version. Also on Fedora 23 I don't see that particular kernel bug. Everything seems to work great, I'll file any bugs if I see them. Thank you! On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:22 AM

Kernel 4.2.3-200 stability problems and mouse cursor defects...

nd have sent several reset password requests but no reset link has been sent to me. Thank you! Best, Alex G.S. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: New contributor looking for Python projects/packages...

Hi All, Thank you for the responses and the suggestions. The Python SIG looks awesome. I'll definitely be looking into these. Thanks! Best, Alexander GS On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 17:38 -0400, Alex G.S. wrote: &

New contributor looking for Python projects/packages...

Devel, Fedora is my favorite Linux distribution by a wide margin and I currently enjoy Workstation on both my work (devops) and home computer. I've started working with Python and I want to contribute back to Fedora by taking on small tasks where needed. Can you suggest a list of Python based/or

Intel driver pain

> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin > wrote: > >* Hi, *> > >* Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: *> > >* [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 *>* [vie > may 29 07:01:22 2

[no subject]

> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin > wrote: > >* Hi, *> > >* Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: *> > >* [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 *>* > [vie may 29 07:01:22 2

Self Introduction: Alex Kashchenko

Hi Fedora developers, My name is Alex Kashchenko (Kasko), I just created my first review request - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065 . It is a small vi-like binary editor, I used it previously in Debian and found it convenient for small binary changes. I contacted the

[EPEL-devel] duplicity

Hello, I have encountered with bug in duplicity-0.6.22 - https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557 which I have installed from EPEL repository on CentOS 6. Is it possible upgrade duplicity at least to 0.6.25? P.S. As you can see from the thread above - there is conflict with libr

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

> This is in a sub package now you have to install gnome-session-wayland-session Thanks! On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:41 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:29 PM, alex diavatis > wrote: > > drago01, > > > > After upgrading Rawhide today, the Wayland sess

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

>After upgrading Rawhide today, the Wayland session (/usr/share/wayland-sessions) vanished. >How do you start Gnome On Wayland on Rawhide? I know how to start a Gnome Wayland session, but I mean why isn't on GDM by default. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:29 PM, alex diavatis wrote:

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

3.05.2014 15:51, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:27 AM, alex diavatis wrote: > >> > >> From Fedora Docs (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wayland) > >> > >> >To avoid destabilizing the X compositor, mutter will ship tw

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

>From Fedora Docs (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wayland) >To avoid destabilizing the X compositor, mutter will ship two separate libraries, and gnome-shell will ship two binaries that will link against them. Concretely, we plan to have a separate mutter-wayland package. Mutter-Wayland i

Re: orphaning ooolatex + maintainership of my other packages up for grabs

Thanks, Luis. I just orphaned both python-biopython and sqlite2 so you can go ahead and take ownership via PkgDB (I added myself as a co-maintainer for both packages before orphaning). Cheers, Alex Luis Enrique Bazán De León wrote: > I can take part of this work :-) > R

orphaning ooolatex + maintainership of my other packages up for grabs

e packages deserve more active maintainers than I am able to be right now. Cheers, Alex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

  1   2   >