>From Fedora Docs (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wayland)
>To avoid destabilizing the X compositor, mutter will ship two separate libraries, and gnome-shell will ship two binaries that will link against them. Concretely, we plan to have a separate mutter-wayland package. Mutter-Wayland in GNOME 3.13.1 is merged to Mutter, so how can have 2 different packages? On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fed...@leemhuis.info>wrote: > Hi! > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 30.04.2014 16:27: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 29.04.2014 14:04: > >> > Port the GNOME desktop to Wayland. > >> > >> Sorry, but what is actually proposed here? The above sentence for me > >> doesn't make any sense(¹), as Gnome 3.12 is able to run on Wayland > >> already (not perfectly, but it works afaik), so it was ported already > >> I'd say. > >> > >> Is this about integrating this work in Fedora? Or more porting work? Or > >> even make Wayland the default in F21? The section "How To Test" sounds > >> as if the later is the case, but it's not entirely clear to me. > >> > >> (¹) This is not the first change proposal where the summary or the > >> "Detailed Description" is more confusing then helpful to me (which makes > >> me write this mail). It afaics would help a lot if those areas would use > >> words that ordinary people (think of people that have only basic > >> computer skills here) would be able to understand. > > > > I usually try to work with change owners on clear wording, > > I know. Many thanks for all your hard work. > > > […] > > > For wording - Changes are *not* supposed to be read by general public, > > But we know the public reads them, as those that write websites, blogs > and sometimes even magazines articles will pick these things up -- > especially in cases like this. Unclear words or statements thus could > lead to confusion or bad press. > > Side note: "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well > enough." > > > it's internal planning tool and docs/marketing guys makes it consumable > > in the end. > > Thus FESCo, ordinary developers like me (we get these change propose > mails for a reason) and docs/marketing should be able to properly > understand it -- which afaics to often is not the case :-/ > > > But generally I agree - better wording, better understanding. > > +1 > > CU > knurd > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
