ts.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Aleksa
ist Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
gt; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Aleksandar
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 9:45 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Aleksandar Kurtakov writes:
>
> > List of packages orphaned (all were maintained for the sake of Eclipse
> > stack):
> > * eclipse
> > [...]
>
> Could upstream eclipse make an effort to reduce its depe
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:20 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2021 12:35, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Eclipse IDE and its ancillary packages are orphaned now. As a result the
> > Eclipse IDE will no longer be installable as a
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:00 PM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> On 10. 08. 21 16:14, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > FWIW, it wasn't me who unorphaned packages - Mat (who was the
> maintainer) left
> > my team and passed off his eclipse packages to me so probably this
> interfer
* eclipse-license
* eclipse-m2e-core
* eclipse-m2e-workspace
* eclipse-mpc
* eclipse-subclipse
* eclipse-webtools
* felix-gogo-command
* felix-gogo-parent
* felix-gogo-runtime
* felix-gogo-shell
* felix-scr
* icu4j
* jsch
* lucene
* rhino
* takari-polyglot
* tycho
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Re
in decent time.
FWIW, it wasn't me who unorphaned packages - Mat (who was the maintainer)
left my team and passed off his eclipse packages to me so probably this
interfered with some automated procedure.
>
>
> --
> Miro HronÄok
> --
> Phone
idelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
deve
I have no need for the following thus orphaned them:
* jnr-enxio
* jnr-unixsocket
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
Due to no time nor need for it I've just orphaned tomcat-taglibs-standard
and its build requirement tomcat-taglibs-parent.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:54 AM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:16:02AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > You get a side tag in Koji where you can have private build-only
> > dependencies that are discarded (filtered) once they are no longer
> > needed, after module build is do
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
&g
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
> >
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:33 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Bjƶrn Persson wrote:
>
>> Guido Aulisi wrote:
>> > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software
>> directly from upstream.
>> > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted
; > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the
> javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with
> > java-11-openjdk as system JDK")
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > &
Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the
Change to Java 11 as a default?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >
> > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Current stats from my testing samples:
> 408 failing
> 263 passing
>
> That is huge improvement. Thank you all.
> I'm now running last rebuild n copr, and in week or two an mass rebuild
> will be taken in koji.
>
> There was an discussion what t
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Current stats from my testing samples:
> 408 failing
> 263 passing
>
>
Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/java-maint-sig/java-11-default/monitor/
I see a bit more than 200 ftbfs.
> That is hug
Hey Jiri,
Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding
the ant one but didn't succeed yet
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
> Please see
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:55 PM Michal Srb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
>> > Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
>> I
>> > should have been more clear there. Sorry f
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:46 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now.
>
> What we did when
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:10 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just orphaned a few Java packages on behalf of the Stewardship
> SIG since we no longer have any use for them.
>
> - aalto-xml
> - compress-lzf
> - icu4j
>
^^ Mat, should we take it or keep a huge patch removing the need f
I've just orphaned jacoco as I had interest in it only for eclipse-eclemma
package which has been retired already. Dependencies are missing and it
FTBFS in the last mass rebuild
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799528
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
I've just orphaned rome (Java rss library). Couple of its dependencies have
been removed and I don't have neither the time nor the need to maintain it
anymore.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
depends on. Also if you use other
flatpaks you'll be surprised how much smaller the actual download size will
be.
> Also, for one, Flatpak version of Eclipse does not support built-in
> support.
>
I'm not exactly sure what does "built-in" means here.
>
&
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:07 AM Code Zombie wrote:
> Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of
> development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does
> anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
>
We (Eclipse maintainers in Fedora) ar
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 7:27 PM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> On 12. 12. 19 18:03, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:50 AM Miro HronÄok
> wrote:
> >>
> >> maven-verifier-plugin orphan 0
> weeks ago
> >
> > I adopted this package to unbreak my deps. If
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:31 PM Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> As an example of the sorry state of the Java SIG, pdfbox and batik were
> orphaned 2 weeks ago, but those are dependencies of fop, which is a
> dependency of publican, which is used by appstream to build documentation,
> and half of the distr
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:54 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 09:17, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:08:02 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> > >On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >> I can't speak for everyone, but at least my experience was that it was
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:14 PM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> On 18. 11. 19 19:55, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Dear Eclipse users,
> > Whoever faces issues installing Eclipse RPMs on Fedora 31 - this is
> beyond us
> > (Eclipse packagers) and depends on a number of bigger
Dear Eclipse users,
Whoever faces issues installing Eclipse RPMs on Fedora 31 - this is beyond
us (Eclipse packagers) and depends on a number of bigger issues in Fedora
land both technical and political.
Until this is fixed, you're strongly recommended to try using Eclipse from
Flathub [1]. It shou
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:17 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > So people would prefer no packages at all over packages in modules?
>
> I see 2 reasons so far why some packages are module-only:
> 1. because a dependency of the package is module-only. Th
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:02 AM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 9:02:07 AM MST Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > Again, no one forces you or any other packager to use modularity
> > tooling right now.
>
> This is not actually the case. We have several major packages which a
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:55 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> Hi, Aleksandar,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:40 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:31 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
> >>
> >&
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:31 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 5:10 PM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> >
> > On 12. 11. 19 17:02, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > > Again, no one forces you or any other packager to use modularity
> > > tooling right now.
> > >
> > > As Fedora developer
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:06 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:43 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:13 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sunday, October 13, 2019 11:42
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:13 AM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Sunday, October 13, 2019 11:42:41 PM MST Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM John M. Harris Jr
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:46:52 PM MST Ben
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:46:52 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modules_In_Non-Modular_Buildroot
> >
> > Enable module default streams in the buildroot repository for modular
> > and non-modular R
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:53 PM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
>
> So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?oo
>
Good question. There are o
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now and there are a
number of FTBFS for me as a package I've just orphaned the following:
* eclipse-tm-terminal
* eclipse-swtbot
* cbi-plugins
* eclipse-dtp
* eclipse-ecf
* eclipse-eclemma
* eclipse-egit-github
* eclipse-linuxtools
* eclipse-mor
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:23 PM Dridi Boukelmoune <
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello packagers,
> >
> > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:31 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > The real question which every packager should ask himself is: Do I have
> > the capacity (time, knowledge, hardware, etc.) to solve problems on
> > non-supported architecture by upstream?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:29 AM Miro HronÄok wrote:
> On 14. 08. 19 8:55, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > It depends on package maintainer. If upstream dropped 32-bit support,
> I'd stop
> > building it for that arch in Fedora.
> >
> > Why would package maintainer have to bear the burden of poten
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:48 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Christopher"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Cc: "Fabio Valentini"
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Over 50
I don't need h2 package for anything and it fails to build on F30. It has 2
co-maintainers so maybe someone will pick it up.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:06 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:22, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * SĆ©rgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :
>> >>>
>> >>> I tho
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:51 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 2/12/19 8:22 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:19 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >> I'm curious: What happens to modules when a package's master branch
> >> gets retired?
> >
> > Nothing. Modules will continue to
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 5:32 PM Mat Booth wrote:
> The message about Ceph [1] reminded me that we should probably make the
> same notification for Eclipse Platform.
>
> The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support
> for 32bit arches.
>
> The current state is that upstrea
eclipse-xtext and its dependencies eclipse-xpand and eclipse-emf-mwe have
just been orphaned. Eclipse SIG has no use of these packages anymore
(despite them being really active upstream), the build system is quite
complicated and they haven't been properly kept upto date lately.
--
Alexander Kurt
I've just orphaned not-yet-commons-ssl [1]. It is a dependency of
eclipse-fedorapackager but I'm not sure how useful this dependency still is
I haven't used it lately. The library has a dependency on
jakarta-commons-httpclient which has been EOLed in 2011 [2] .
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
Hi everyone,
Fedorapackager eclipse plugin has been neglected for quite some time and
updates are broken after the Bodhi2 update.
So are there any users left? Is anyone interested in maintaining it? Enhancing
it?
Any feedback is more than welcome as it might be time to let it rest in peace
if
- Original Message -
> From: "Kalev Lember"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, 26 September, 2015 1:08:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree
>
> On 09/24/2015 07:2
IIRC, sqljet needs netbeans-platform (swing-smth to be precious from netbeans)
for its db browser UI which is a subpackage so disabling this part to build
(and killing the browser subpackage) should remove the need for netbeans
platform
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Me
- Original Message -
> From: "Orion Poplawski"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, 21 August, 2015 1:58:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets
>
> On 08/20/2015 02:50 AM, Miroslav SuchĆ½ wrote:
> >
> > I was just wat
Hi everyone,
I will push Lucene 5.1.0 to rawhide next week. Followed immediately by Eclipse
rebuild to make it work with it.
This is early enough in the F23 cycle to give time for people to port to 5.x.
If someone is not able to migrate to Lucene 5 - he/she would have to submit a
Lucene 4.x comp
ubject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
> >> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not inter
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:58:05 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
&
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:43:53 AM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Marcano"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:20:04 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > = P
- Original Message -
> From: "Mario Torre"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:59:35 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 18:22 +0100, Miko
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/26/2015 09:3
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:16:26 AM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote:
> >>
a
>
> On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015 04:59 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> >> On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, "Mikolaj Izdebski" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >>>>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 11:14:35 AM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > On 0
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:02:38 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrot
- Original Message -
> From: "Marian Csontos"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root
>
> On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, VĆt Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 VĆt Ondruch napsal(
- Original Message -
> From: "Alec Leamas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 10:19:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora,but stemming
> from gnome-software and desktop environments
>
> On 03/01/15 20:26
- Original Message -
> From: "Hedayat Vatankhah"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 11:15:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora,but stemming
> from gnome-software and desktop environments
>
>
>
> Luya Ts
Not a bundling but creating a compat packages for older version where needed.
Nothing stops people from creating them now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Boyer"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, December
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
> Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
>
>
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bas
- Original Message -
> From: "Bastien Nocera"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM
> Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrie
In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that gcc-java
is no longer built.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Omair Majid"
> To: "fedora-devel"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:58:46 PM
> Subject: Comps change for OpenJDK 8
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 6:44:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Slipping F21
>
>
> Am 11.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
> > +1, we've already skipped one release and we just can't delay
> > significantly
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Hughes"
> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop"
>
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 6:28:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Jackson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
>
> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and
I don't have the time and energy to maintain piccolo2d and it's no longer
needed by my packages - thus orphaned now. Feel free to pick it up if you want
to keep it in.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Deprecated now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:32:49 PM
> Subject: Orphaning eclipse-birt
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Fedora Java
> Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
> discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:03:42 PM
> Subject: Hadoop + log4j2 = fullstop
>
> I'
I don't have the time nor to will to deal with it anymore.
Master is orphan now, feel free to pick it up. If noone does it in a week I'll
deprecate the package.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
- Original Message -
> From: "Florian Weimer"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:00:54 PM
> Subject: [fedora-java] Mass-bug filing for removed OpenJDK 9 internal APIs
>
> I plan to file bugs against packa
for rhel-6 and
> rhel-7?
As you probably have guessed I can not answer such questions. You can either
speak to your TAM or wait for public announcements.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > One of the biggest offender
team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Deepak Bhole" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:41:30 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> I'm not proposing h
Even smaller than one would think.
/me joins the party :)
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Oden Eriksson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 9:49:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Self Introduction: Oden Eriksson
>
usable for pretty much anything in Fedora repository. This might sound like a
simple task to do but if you multiply it by few hundred packages have to be
audited and all the complications coming from the variety of build systems it
becomes a huge investment of time to have Java 8 as def
time-frame of the F21. This is one the reasons why we would
> like to be able to switch over to OpenJDK8 asap for F21.
>
> 1: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
>
> Deepak
>
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
&
Please keep java 1.7.0 around for some time. It would make moving easier if we
have to jump back for a build or two.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Omair Majid"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9
I'm all with you Ville.
But this requires someone jumping in to do work and there is noone. We have to
live in reality - noone is showing any interest into working on this :(.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Ville SkyttƤ"
> To: "Development discuss
Hi Jerry,
Closing as notabug is perfectly valid solution in your case. I also have a
bunch of such packages myself. The thing is that there is no way for this to
have been known by the automated tool thus we end up with such false positives.
I have to also add that the percentage of false posit
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Boyer"
> To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:53:03 PM
> Subject: Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrang
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Todorov"
> To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
> ,
> "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> Cc: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:51:52 PM
> Subjec
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:21:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd
>
> On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:50:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:48 +, C
chainsaw
>
> On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Clarification the actual chain is
> >
> > java-headless->rhino->jline->jansi->hawtjni->xbean->avalon-framework->log4j
>
> Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't m
chainsaw
>
> On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Clarification the actual chain is
> >
> > java-headless->rhino->jline->jansi->hawtjni->xbean->avalon-framework->log4j
>
> Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't m
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Hughes"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:32:57 PM
> Subject: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs
> log4j-chainsaw
>
> If I understand the dep-chain correctly:
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
