OLD: Fedora-eln-20250409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:19
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:52.37 MiB
Size
Report started at 2025-04-10 01:00:46 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
Hey Peter ,
What I meant is personally I haven't had any such issues with Fedora Board
which you have mentioned in my 3 years as a contributor. I totally
understand your point of view as well
Regards
On Thu, 10 Apr, 2025, 1:15 am Peter Boy Uni, wrote:
>
>
> > Am 09.04.2025 um 21:20 schrieb Nis
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Eduard Lucena wrote:
>> Can we go ahead in time and let kevin to create the gdm-x11 package? We
>
> Sure, if he wants to?
I do not currently have plans to introduce that package, though I would
encourage people who care enough about
On 4/9/25 9:39 AM, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
"You can't ask Kalev Lember because that account is disabled."
:( I hope it is just a job change and nothing serious.
Regards,
Michael
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
I correct a License tag in Fedora 43 and 42 of:
icecast package from
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD" to
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND HPND AND BSD-2-Clause"
and icecast-doc package from
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND FSFULLR AND FSFUL"
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> Can we go ahead in time and let kevin to create the gdm-x11 package? We
Sure, if he wants to?
But I'll note that as far as I know, upstream plans to remove this in
the upcoming gnome cycle, so you would need to re-add it back and
m
The Fedora Linux 42 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will take place on
Thursday April 10 @ 1700 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org[2].
At this time, we will determine the status of the F42 Beta release
date [3] that is currently targeting Tuesday, 15 April.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Me
Proposed as F42 blocker to discuss more widely before releasing the
upcoming Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358741
Thanks for raising and mentioning this!
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
__
> Am 09.04.2025 um 21:20 schrieb Nishant Mishra :
>
> Peter Boy ,
> In this case you are wrong 😒
> I have been a Fedora Contributor since Last 3 years
Sorry if my wording was imprecise. I wasn't referring to you or anyone in
particular. I was referring to various discussions, mostly on Devel
Can we go ahead in time and let kevin to create the gdm-x11 package? We
already know how this is going to be:
- The SIG is going to say they don't have bandwidth, hands or time to
support tickets with problems for x11
- Kevin and a lot of us that still use X11 are going to say that this
change is
Kevin it's for GDM and I have used GDM with X11
On Thu, 10 Apr, 2025, 12:00 am Peter Boy Uni, wrote:
>
>
> > Am 09.04.2025 um 19:19 schrieb Jared K. Smith >:
> >
> > but I take exception to your language here. I don't see this as a
> "crusade" (to use your word), I see this as the GDM maintain
Peter Boy ,
In this case you are wrong 😒
I have been a Fedora Contributor since Last 3 years
On Thu, 10 Apr, 2025, 12:48 am Nishant Mishra,
wrote:
> Kevin it's for GDM and I have used GDM with X11
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr, 2025, 12:00 am Peter Boy Uni, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Am 09.04.2025 um 19:19 sch
=
# #meeting-1:fedoraproject.org: fedora_coreos_meeting
=
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-09/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-04-09-16.30.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedor
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 13:21, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to update libcamera to 0.5.0 in rawhide, which means ABI change.
>> The only package affected is pipewire-plugin-libcamera, which must be
>> rebuilt against the updated libcamera version.
>>
>
> libc
> Am 09.04.2025 um 19:19 schrieb Jared K. Smith :
>
> but I take exception to your language here. I don't see this as a "crusade"
> (to use your word), I see this as the GDM maintainers making a choice to
> support one way of doing things instead of two. Calling it a "crusade" (and
> the im
On 09. 04. 25 16:39, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
Hi,
I tried to ping Kalev Lember at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315461 but got
"You can't ask Kalev Lember because that account is disabled."
I tried to write to him at klem...@redhat.com but got
On 25-04-09 10:16, RedHatGmail SMT
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> This crusade against X11 in Fedora needs to stop NOW!
>
I'm not involved in this change -- but I take exception to your language
here. I don't see this as a "crusade" (to use your word), I see this a
Nishant Mishra wrote:
> It's all good but then in Plasma also you can install X11 session
Yes, but only because *I* packaged kwin-x11 and plasma-workspace-x11
separately and went through a long argument in the FESCo issue tracker with
the KDE SIG trying to block me from introducing those 2 packa
Neal Gompa wrote:
> You need to switch to another display manager, as GDM no longer
> supports X11 sessions.
Time to fork GDM.
Kevin Kofler
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
Nishant Mishra wrote:
> Do you know you still can use X11 sessions on Gnome on Fedora by
> installing the X Packages? This does not mean that X11 support has
> completely been dropped !
Only by using an alternate display manager, and GNOME is known for not
supporting some functionality if GDM is
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> This crusade against X11 in Fedora needs to stop NOW!
>>
>
> I'm not involved in this change -- but I take exception to your language
> here. I don't see this as a "crusa
Hey Kevin ,
Do you know you still can use X11 sessions on Gnome on Fedora by installing
the X Packages? This does not mean that X11 support has completely been
dropped !
Regards
Nishant Mishra
On Wed, 9 Apr, 2025, 10:50 pm Jared K. Smith,
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM Kevin Kofler
On 25-04-09 19:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 04. 25 16:39, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
Hi,
I tried to ping Kalev Lember at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315461 but got
"You can't ask Kalev Lember because that account is disabled."
I tried to write to him at klem...@redhat.com but
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel wrote:
> It has been mentioned in various places [1][2] that GDM has dropped
> support for running X11 session in F42. However, I cannot find the
> corresponding Change in the F42 Change list [3]. Has this been done
> without raising a Change? If yes, I'd ar
On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 16:44 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You need to switch to another display manager, as GDM no longer
> > supports X11 sessions.
>
> Time to fork GDM.
>
"It is being explicitly dropped from GDM as the code to X11 greeter
mode is also tied to sup
Hello!
It has been mentioned in various places [1][2] that GDM has dropped
support for running X11 session in F42. However, I cannot find the
corresponding Change in the F42 Change list [3]. Has this been done
without raising a Change? If yes, I'd argue that it should be reverted
and done in F43 w
Sérgio Basto via devel wrote:
> "It is being explicitly dropped from GDM as the code to X11 greeter
> mode is also tied to supporting X11 sessions. If you want to
> use X11 sessions, you need to use something else. "
>
https://lists.pagure.io/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7RLN
Benson Muite wrote:
> enchant still uses it:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/enchant2/blob/rawhide/f/enchant2.spec
But Enchant is an abstraction layer that can be built without the aspell
backend, which…
> Other dependencies on f41 are limited:
> enchant-aspell
… as you can see, is a speci
Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> It would be unfair to require upstream to support that pattern when
> CMake does not provide the tools to do so (I know about approaches with
> $ and configure_package_config_file(PATH_VARS), but
> these are not easy to adapt and support for older versions).
if(IS_AB
Latest version 1.30.3 is on the testing repo
Used by
collectd
fastnetmon
hydra
netdata
opensips
polymake
rsyslog
syslog-ng
php-pecl-mongodb
If your package use it and find it using cmake
please look at upstream changelog
ht
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 2:56 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are crucial for Fedora), so I wanted to
Minutes:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-02/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-04-02-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-02/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-04-02-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbo
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Ideally things would just be more resistant to being able to make the
> mistakes in the first place, but sometimes thats not easy to do.
As far as I can see, things are quite resistant already considering that the
gating has blocked this from going into Rawhide. :-)
If this
Hello team,
MaterialX, a set of open standard materials, is ready for review. It is
needed by Blender as a new optional dependency.
Here is the bug report:
bugzilla.redhat.com
2262694 – Review Request: materialx - Open standard for the exchange of
rich material <#>
🔗 https://bugzilla.red
OLD: Fedora-42-20250408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.57 MiB
Size of
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@fale:fale.io, 16:59:58)
* TOPIC: #3385 Change: Java25 And No More System JDK (@fale:fale.io, 17:04:24)
* AGREED: to be discussed again the next time hoping for the Change Owner
will be present
* TOPIC: #3373 Change: Fix limitations in gpg
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 69
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.58 KiB
Size of dropped packages
38 matches
Mail list logo
