Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread jani
😃Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Watch Original message From: Jason Tibbitts Date: 16/08/2023 06:58 (GMT+02:00) To: Sandro Mani Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: Planning to update to p

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> Sandro Mani writes: > To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with > the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to > review in exchange. Note that it's not necessary to go through the review process for multiple versions of packages like this,

Re: Heads-up: webkit2gtk4.0 and javascriptcoregtk4.0 subpackages to be dropped

2023-08-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 19:52 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Since Fedora 39 has been branched, it's now time to remove the > webkit2gtk4.0 (and javascriptcoregtk4.0) subpackages from rawhide to > implement the Fedora 40 change proposal: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remov

Heads-up: webkit2gtk4.0 and javascriptcoregtk4.0 subpackages to be dropped

2023-08-15 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hi, Since Fedora 39 has been branched, it's now time to remove the webkit2gtk4.0 (and javascriptcoregtk4.0) subpackages from rawhide to implement the Fedora 40 change proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version A reminder that webkit2gtk4.0 provides Web

Re: Intent to orphan several python packages

2023-08-15 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
On 8/13/23 17:17, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several o

Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review req

Re: Potential (security) issue for beginners/non-experts when release is End Of Life: Fedora doesn’t consider the behavior of beginners/non-experts sufficiently

2023-08-15 Thread Przemek Klosowski via devel
On 8/15/23 09:51, Stephen Smoogen wrote: Each of these groups have 'farms' of several hundred of each type of phone which get continual updates and they have a long certification process to make sure that they reach 'all the phones updated without problems and ran N hours without issues afterwa

Proposal to improve the background packaging process

2023-08-15 Thread Adam Williamson
Cross-posting here as folks may be interested: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-to-improve-the-background-packaging-process/87527/2 I proposed an idea to try and improve the background packaging process to avoid there being so much hassle when the backgrounds aren't ready by the Br

Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit

2023-08-15 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear Lennart, I'm sorry, I don't get. Quoting the https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.socket.html#TriggerLimitIntervalSec= Configures a limit on how often this socket unit may be activated within a specific time interval. The TriggerLimitIntervalSec= may be used to configur

Re: Potential (security) issue for beginners/non-experts when release is End Of Life: Fedora doesn’t consider the behavior of beginners/non-experts sufficiently

2023-08-15 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 17:59, Przemek Klosowski via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 8/13/23 16:57, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > look at SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release and nag more frequently. > > Highly recommend other Fedora editions consider similar notifications. > > I d

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230815.n.0 changes

2023-08-15 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20230814.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230815.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 77 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.32 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Pykka was orphaned

2023-08-15 Thread Tobias Girstmair
Hi all, python3-Pykka (srpm 'pykka') was orphaned yesterday. I intend to adopt it and fix it, probably this weekend. If someone wants to be co-maintainer, please reach out! tobi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Nicola Sella
> > Perhaps a 'dnf-is-dnf5' providing the dnf command as a symlink to dnf5 > (taking inspiration from debian's python-is-python3) would work as a > stop-gap, so people who want a system with just dnf could install that > package as an alternate dnf provider ? > Rather than a `dnf-is-dnf5` package,

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Dominique Martinet
Vít Ondruch wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200: > > I think only the mass-prebuild maintainer can help you there. dnf5 > > cannot be set to provide dnf, because it...doesn't. > > > I know and yet again, I have not find any issues using mass-prebuild with > DNF5 and until now, it worke

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230815.n.0 changes

2023-08-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230814.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230815.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 110 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.39 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Petr Pisar
V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ond

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf > > > > Updating and loading rep

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Petr Pisar
V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf > > > Updating and loading repositories: > > > Repositories loaded. > > > Failed to resolve th

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

2023-08-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Can you please make this work? ~~~ $ sudo dnf update -x dnf Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem 1: package mass-prebuild-1.1.