Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:43:30 -, John Dulaney wrote: Here's an idea. How about Gnome fix their broken crap, and let's not enable this missfeature in systemd? All these problems (including the true, root problem!) go away. Alas, this seems to be too difficult a solution. Let's be

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 30 May 2016 01:43:30 - "John Dulaney" wrote: > You know, it seems to me that systemd doing this to work around a > Gnome problem (and a problem I have not seen outside of Gnome), is > sort of like glibc working around a bug in Firefox and at the same > time breaking bash. We're takin

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread John Dulaney
You know, it seems to me that systemd doing this to work around a Gnome problem (and a problem I have not seen outside of Gnome), is sort of like glibc working around a bug in Firefox and at the same time breaking bash. We're taking a bug in the Gnome stack and putting a 'fix' in systemd that b

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> * Does 'loginctl enable-linger ' take effect in the current >> session? Or do you have to start a new one? does it persist over >> sessions or only affects the current/next one? > Lingering applies to the systemd --user ins

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Chris Murphy
So there's tmux, screen, curl, wget, and probably quite a few others that don't necessarily get daemonized that are probably affected. It may be that most problems are processes instantiated by the DE running in the user session; and if that's true then maybe the DE needs to be more aggressive wit

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:53:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, my 2 cents... > > Some questions for upstream: > > * I assume killed processes are logged in the journal, but Is there > any way to have a 'permissive' version? ie, simply log what would > have been killed, but not do anythi

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > If there is a systematic > problem of badly written code leaving orphaned code running when > a user logs out, then that broken code should be fixed instead of > adding another layer of process management. systemd is not capable > of interpre

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 29 May 2016 at 17:05, mastaiza wrote: > and I think that at least half of the works on redhat > Just because someone is paid by Red Hat does not mean they are paid to work on Fedora. They usually have a 60 hour a week job doing some other thing on some other product. Only around 20 people are

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
and I think that at least half of the works on redhat faster to find a new distro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread James Hogarth
On 29 May 2016 21:02, "mastaiza" wrote: > > > but what about the people who used this window Manager . I think its not respectful to the users > -- All packagers in Fedora ultimately are volunteers and we don't get too tell people they have maintain any given package. Your options are find an ex

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
but what about the people who used this window Manager . I think its not respectful to the users -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * Does 'loginctl enable-linger ' take effect in the current > session? Or do you have to start a new one? does it persist over > sessions or only affects the current/next one? > Also, what exactly does linger do? Does it turn off the k

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
So, my 2 cents... Some questions for upstream: * I assume killed processes are logged in the journal, but Is there any way to have a 'permissive' version? ie, simply log what would have been killed, but not do anything? That would be very helpful to folks to identify things that would be

Re: No capslock indication on LVM boot password entry

2016-05-29 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Martin Ueding wrote: > I use a LUKS-LVM setup to encrypt my whole drive. Something within > `/boot` then asks me to enter the password and boots after that. > > On some occasions, especially with the laptop keyboard, I accidentally > hit the capslock key. After th

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
I'm guessing you are subscribed to this mailing list. Every now and then you get messages with subject lines like "Orphaned packages in rawhide". You could have seen it quite some time ago. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/219062 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

No capslock indication on LVM boot password entry

2016-05-29 Thread Martin Ueding
I use a LUKS-LVM setup to encrypt my whole drive. Something within `/boot` then asks me to enter the password and boots after that. On some occasions, especially with the laptop keyboard, I accidentally hit the capslock key. After that all password attempts are wrong, of course. The problem is tha

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
it is necessary in advance to warn about the deletion . or do I have to guess about this myself -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread gil
Il 29/05/2016 19:18, mastaiza ha scritto: Hi . Started to update one of the computers on which stands jwm and surprise he's not in the fedora repository 24 . Hi, It was retired 2016/05/19, because it was orphaned for more than six weeks. Regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
your I should follow packet . I just want to enjoy and not to think what else is there to remove in the new issue -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

2016-05-29 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
It was orphaned in late February. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jwm/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jwm

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
Hi . Started to update one of the computers on which stands jwm and surprise he's not in the fedora repository 24 . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: yumex-dnf

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
here I do not speak English I now to guess where to click or to sit with a dictionary -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

yumex-dnf

2016-05-29 Thread mastaiza
24 yumex in Fedora has been removed place it in yumex-dnf . I have a question where Russian language . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 27.05.16 19:03, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: > > >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between > >a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is > >unresponsive but is doing something; and

[Test-Announce] 2016-05-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

2016-05-29 Thread Adam Williamson
# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-05-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Final blockers to review. There are also 5 accepted blockers to check in on, and 5 proposed freeze exception issues to review since the freeze will

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-05-30 Fedora QA Meeting

2016-05-29 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. We're into Final validation mode now, and I don't think there are any urgent topics to discuss. If anyone has anything that we should meet about, please do reply to this email and we can go ahead and schedule the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Wil

Fedora 24-20160529.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 3/73 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386) ID: 19567 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/19567 ID: 19603 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthi

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160529.n.0 changes

2016-05-29 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 18 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Fedora Rawhide-20160529.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 44/67 (x86_64), 10/16 (i386) ID: 19464 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160529.n.0 changes

2016-05-29 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 24 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B

Re: Review swap requested

2016-05-29 Thread gil
hi take! for swap see comment in your review requests regards .g Il 29/05/2016 10:52, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto: Hello team, I am willing to do a review in exchange of the following packages: gimp-layer-via-copy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329923 radeontop: https:/

Review swap requested

2016-05-29 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, I am willing to do a review in exchange of the following packages: gimp-layer-via-copy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329923 radeontop: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962 Thanks in advance, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedor

Fedora 23 Rescue Grub Entry Remains after Upgrading to Fedora 24

2016-05-29 Thread Sumit Bhardwaj
Hello Everyone, Yesterday, I upgraded my fully updated Fedora 23 Workstation installation to Fedora 24 using dnf system upgrade plugin without any issues. However, I noticed that though Fedora 24 kernel (currently 4.5.5-300.fc24.x86_64) is installed and present at the top of the list in grub

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread James Hogarth
On 29 May 2016 5:02 a.m., "Nico Kadel-Garcia" wrote: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> > >> >It seems to me systemd should be able to know