Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > I really don't know why you make these suggestions. I mean, you must > know no-one is going to reply "Why, Kevin! What a brilliant idea! We'll > do so immediately!", so what's the point? Why not? That's the only reply that possibly makes sense. It is very obvious that aut

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected > during basic document manipulation" for packages which are not installable > at all due dependencie problems? Indeed, people giving +1 after manually installing dependencies (!!!) from Koji (for a packa

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 04:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this up. I've written to each of the people who > > provided positive feedback asking them to be careful in giving feedback > > for updates before they reach updates-testing in future and providi

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. I've written to each of the people who > provided positive feedback asking them to be careful in giving feedback > for updates before they reach updates-testing in future and providing > some information on the requirements for dependencies in u

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Christopher Meng
On 2/24/14, Adam Williamson wrote: > Christopher, Harald's going overboard with his emphasis as usual, but he > is correct that you should take extra care when giving karma if you > don't get the update from the updates-testing repository. In future, > please do be careful to check if the updates

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 18:12 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 > > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during > basic > document ma

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 18:36 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > One potential workflow bug with this karmic automatic-push-to-stable: under > > the normal time-delayed path, any editing of the build reverts the package > > set to pending. Ye

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 01:33 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Let's test this one asap to prevent epoch(if you want): > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20,mdds-0.10.2-1.fc20 > > Last weekend bodhi seemed very slow on processing updates, so I > downloaded and installed f

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 23:33 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > and no "you have to apologize" from the maintainer does change that > > > > if the maintainers would run a baisc virtual machine consuming > > ordinary repos without manual overrides such mistakes would be > > recognized by them.. >

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Jon
My apologies on the slow bodhi updates last week. There were a number of complications the past week related to the work flow of bodhi updates. Took me a while to resolve some problems, and see the updates to completion. At least twice the updates push failed due to older NVR's in updates-testing

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 23.02.2014 22:40, schrieb Theodore Lee: >> On 24/02/14 06:29, Susi Lehtola wrote: >>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:12:55 +0100 >>> Reindl Harald wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc2

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.02.2014 22:40, schrieb Theodore Lee: > On 24/02/14 06:29, Susi Lehtola wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:12:55 +0100 >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 >>> >>> h

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Theodore Lee
On 24/02/14 06:29, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:12:55 +0100 > Reindl Harald wrote: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 >> >> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, n

Re: Creating local repo

2014-02-23 Thread Achilleas Pipinellis
On 23/02/2014 07:29 μμ, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Could anyone point me to info on creating a local repo? I want to learn > the entire process of creating a package but think it might be wiser to > have a controlled environment > Apart from `man createrepo` you can also check this page[0], just a

Re: Creating local repo

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.02.2014 18:29, schrieb Mauricio Tavares: > Could anyone point me to info on creating a local repo? I want to learn the > entire process of creating a package > but think it might be wiser to have a controlled environment * yum install createrepo * createrepo /path/to/your/rpms * put a fil

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.02.2014 18:36, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > Am 23.02.2014 18:33, schrieb Christopher Meng: >> Let's test this one asap to prevent epoch(if you want): >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20,mdds-0.10.2-1.fc20 >> >> Last weekend bodhi seemed very slow on processing

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.02.2014 18:35, schrieb drago01: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> that is impossible >> >> "libreoffice-core" is affected by a broken dependency >> frankly i have the koji repo endabled (look at the bottom) > > I have no idea what "the koji repo" is but > https://

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 02/24/2014 12:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 >> >> how can people pretend "installation

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.02.2014 18:33, schrieb Christopher Meng: > Let's test this one asap to prevent epoch(if you want): > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20,mdds-0.10.2-1.fc20 > > Last weekend bodhi seemed very slow on processing updates, so I > downloaded and installed from koji by

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On 02/24/2014 12:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic document manipulation" for pac

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Christopher Meng
Let's test this one asap to prevent epoch(if you want): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20,mdds-0.10.2-1.fc20 Last weekend bodhi seemed very slow on processing updates, so I downloaded and installed from koji by myself. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > that is impossible > > "libreoffice-core" is affected by a broken dependency > frankly i have the koji repo endabled (look at the bottom) I have no idea what "the koji repo" is but https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
that is impossible "libreoffice-core" is affected by a broken dependency frankly i have the koji repo endabled (look at the bottom) so the only option to explain teh positive karma is a login on bodhi, don't care about the installed version and for what one is giving karma (there where more libre

Re: Creating local repo

2014-02-23 Thread H . Guémar
Use createrepo, its man page should be more than enough. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:12:55 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 > > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during > basic > document m

Creating local repo

2014-02-23 Thread Mauricio Tavares
Could anyone point me to info on creating a local repo? I want to learn the entire process of creating a package but think it might be wiser to have a controlled environment -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Co

Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Maybe they didn't have any issues? 2014-02-23 18:12 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald : > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 > > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detecte

exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Reindl Harald
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due depe

Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs

2014-02-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:20:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > product WGs (except possibly Cloud, depending on whether they intend to > use anaconda in their deliverables at all), base WG, and fesco - The Cloud plan is to generate images using anaconda. For that case, we don't care about the

Re: static lib <-> shlib ?

2014-02-23 Thread Christopher Meng
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> I'd like to ship static library still. > > What for? > > Feel strongly discouraged to do so. They are a cause of bloating the > distribution and hardly serve any purpose within the distribution. > > Ralf OK. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely,

[perl-CGI-Application] Patch CGI::Application to prevent information disclosure (CVE-2013-7329)

2014-02-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 2a165d17e1ddea0f893ef86c8951686d7ea33a39 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun Feb 23 11:07:44 2014 +0100 Patch CGI::Application to prevent information disclosure (CVE-2013-7329) CGI-Application-4.50-avoid-env-dump.patch | 135 + perl-CGI-Application.spec

Looking for co-maintainer to fix build issue on ARM (zorba package)

2014-02-23 Thread Martin Gieseking
Hi, finally, I found some time to update one of my bigger packages (zorba) to the latest release and to adapt it to build successfully on f21. However, the package (still) fails to build for armv7hl. The generated binary segfauls and therefore also prevents creating additional files during the bui