On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim <sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 02/24/2014 12:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2 >> >> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected >> during basic >> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due >> dependencie problems? >> >> > One potential workflow bug with this karmic automatic-push-to-stable: under > the normal time-delayed path, any editing of the build reverts the package > set to pending. Yet if the package set is being pushed to stable thanks to > meeting the karma threshold, editing the build seems to have no effect (from > the log in the link given, bodhi automatically triggers a push within 4 > seconds, meaning the edited package set is basically never tested) > > What would be a good solution here -- invalidate the karma votes?
Yes because obviously the karma has been given based on testing a different build. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
