On 02/24/2014 12:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2

how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during 
basic
document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due
dependencie problems?


One potential workflow bug with this karmic automatic-push-to-stable: under the normal time-delayed path, any editing of the build reverts the package set to pending. Yet if the package set is being pushed to stable thanks to meeting the karma threshold, editing the build seems to have no effect (from the log in the link given, bodhi automatically triggers a push within 4 seconds, meaning the edited package set is basically never tested)

What would be a good solution here -- invalidate the karma votes? (can be done either by resetting all those votes to zero, or - to better preserve the event log - by inserting a pseudo-vote with equal magnitude but opposite sign to cancel out the previous votes)

Or perhaps impose a mandatory delay similar to the delay that would have taken place anyway had no karma votes taken place?

Best regards,

--
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de       | IRC: michel-...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to