Am 23.02.2014 22:40, schrieb Theodore Lee: > On 24/02/14 06:29, Susi Lehtola wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:12:55 +0100 >> Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2 >>> >>> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected >>> during basic >>> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due >>> dependencie problems? >> >> People *couldn't* know there were problems, because all the positive >> reports were from the time the update was in updates-testing. All who >> tried the update, also had the dependency available in updates-testing. > > For what it's worth, my report (the first with the dependency issue) and > a subsequent one were also from updates-testing, and both did not have > the dependency available.
they never did > I did do a manual check of Koji and Bodhi to try and figure out why my > results were different from the previous testers, and could only find > the necessary build in Koji, which quite frankly left me very confused > and unsure if I was experiencing some kind of mirror sync issue and/or > chronic lack of coffee syndrome. I now understand the initial positive > karma results had something to do with a buildroot override which never hit updates-testing 2014-02-21 13:59:06 This update has been submitted for testing by dtardo 2014-02-22 09:35:15 will be pushed to the stable updates repository this is *unacceptable* in case of broken deps and buildroot overrides while this is not a secuity update and people are pushing such things to stable refuse to understand the the dependecy error may result in *not get whatever SECURITY UPDATE* for ordinary users for no gain and no "you have to apologize" from the maintainer does change that if the maintainers would run a baisc virtual machine consuming ordinary repos without manual overrides such mistakes would be recognized by them..............
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
