adam's grump of the day: icons in fonts (was Re: web-assets-httpd stuck in limbo?)

On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > * Another individual thought that all web authors are stupid for > wanting to use fancy fonts and that I am wasting my time. (He might > be right about that last bit... :-P) While we're doing asides, that one *does* get right on my n

Re: web-assets-httpd stuck in limbo?

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Notice: the current httpd.conf in git is broken because for alias order > which need to be fixed. Yeah I believe there are still a couple of things you mentioned in our conversation in August that still need to be fixed. I'll make sure they'

Re: web-assets-httpd stuck in limbo?

Le 16/01/2014 04:27, Adam Williamson a écrit : > I've been looking at more webapp unbundling stuff over the last couple > of days (as anyone following my G+ feed probably noticed...) and I just > noticed that web-assets-httpd is still not being built. The last note > was back in August: > > * Fri

web-assets-httpd stuck in limbo?

I've been looking at more webapp unbundling stuff over the last couple of days (as anyone following my G+ feed probably noticed...) and I just noticed that web-assets-httpd is still not being built. The last note was back in August: * Fri Aug 16 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth - 4-1 - temporarily disable

Re: Orphaned packages up for grabs

Mauricio Tavares a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Casper wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > >> Greetings. > >> > >> The following packages have been orphaned due to their former > >> maintainer removing themselves from the packager group: > >> > >> NetPIPE > > > >> checkdns > > taken,

File IO-Socket-SSL-1.964.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: dbfedc287725e70337612ab7e8fce889 IO-Socket-SSL-1.964.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-01-16 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-01-16 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-01-16 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2014-01-16 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2014-01-16 1

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

/me wants the ability to push force on *private* branches 2014/1/15 Dridi Boukelmoune > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): > >> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. > >> These cleanups are tr

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches. > Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have > in your local git repo into dist-git, but there is no way how to delete > it by myself.

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-01-15)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC' Links to all tickets bel

Re: Your packages in EPEL-7

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:23:01PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Dear package maintainers, > > I rely on Perl module packages you maintain being in EPEL. Now that > EPEL-7 is open for branch requests, I'd like to kindly ask you to either > request an epel7 branch for your packages or let me know

[Bug 1052197] perl-Test-Most-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052197 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): >> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. >> These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're worth a >> new build. Should I commit them to the master

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

Petr Pisar wrote: Despite there is incompatibility between updated file and rpmbuild, which could be fixed probably on rpmbuild side to scan modules and scripts for requires, the basic problem is git.spec uses old, obsoleted, and broken manual generators: Thanks Petr. I knew that was the old

[Maniphest] [Created] T49: koji download tag directive

tflink created this task. tflink added subscribers: qa-devel, tflink. tflink added a project: taskotron TASK DESCRIPTION Mostly needed for depcheck at the moment, all of the builds in a tag need to be checked along with any triggering builds to verify that the pending builds as a whole don't b

[perl-Module-Build] 0.4204 bump

commit 44eb50cd1ff35faadfd1a81b8a6f3e0252fbec4d Author: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed Jan 15 16:36:20 2014 +0100 0.4204 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Module-Build.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-version/f20] 0.9907 bugfix bump

Summary of changes: 3b79e89... 0.9907 bugfix bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

[Maniphest] [Attached] T49: koji download tag directive

tflink added a dependent task: T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T49 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

[Maniphest] [Attached] T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner

tflink added a dependency: T49: koji download tag directive TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T41 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

File Module-Build-0.4204.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build: 71615f400fb11f20ade6accf7ccb8fbe Module-Build-0.4204.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

[Maniphest] [Created] T48: createrepo directive

tflink created this task. tflink added subscribers: qa-devel, tflink. tflink added a project: taskotron TASK DESCRIPTION At the moment, this is mostly needed for depcheck. Run createrepo on a set of downloaded RPMs. Example: createrepo: repodir={{workdir}}/repo TASK DETAIL https://p

[Maniphest] [Attached] T48: createrepo directive

tflink added a dependent task: T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T48 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

[Maniphest] [Attached] T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner

tflink added a dependency: T48: createrepo directive TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T41 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: EPEL Python 3 for 7?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/15/2014 02:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > > > > > > On 14 January 2014 09:57, Orion Poplawski > wrote: > > It seems like it would be nic

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

Panu Matilainen wrote: Also FYI, /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires (or -provides) is not what's used during rpmbuild unless specifically overridden to use that legacy mechanism. Thanks Panu. Is there a way to get rpmbuild to be more verbose about the finding requires stage? I tried using -vv with

[Maniphest] [Attached] T47: bodhi download

tflink added a dependent task: T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T47 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

[Maniphest] [Retitled] T46: bodhi comment directive module

tflink changed the title from "bodhi directive module" to "bodhi comment directive module". tflink edited the task description. TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T46 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-

[Maniphest] [Created] T47: bodhi download

tflink created this task. tflink added subscribers: qa-devel, tflink. tflink added a project: taskotron TASK DESCRIPTION One of the units of work for taskotron is bodhi updates and the runner needs to be able to download updates. Example: bodhi: action=download arch={{arch}} name={{upd

[Maniphest] [Attached] T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner

tflink added a dependency: T47: bodhi download TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T41 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

Jan Kaluža wrote: On 01/15/2014 01:56 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: [root@f20-64 /]# /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires <<< /builddir/build/BUILD/git-1.8.4.2/git-svn This fails because find-requires only passes the file to perl.req if it's either a .pm file or it's in the script list, which is defined li

[perl-DateTime-Format-Builder] Created tag perl-DateTime-Format-Builder-0.8100-2.el7

The lightweight tag 'perl-DateTime-Format-Builder-0.8100-2.el7' was created pointing to: ca9fb42... license change from "same as perl" to Artistic 2.0 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Downstream .so versioning

Hi, What should one do if the SW he is trying to package produce only unversioned *.so files? I'm currently trying to package LMDB [1] as possible alternative for BerkeleyDB in Fedora, and the hand-written makefile produce only liblmdb.so. I'm trying to persuade the upstream to change it and star

[perl-Variable-Magic] Created tag perl-Variable-Magic-0.53-1.el7

The lightweight tag 'perl-Variable-Magic-0.53-1.el7' was created pointing to: 3a4e2c3... Update to 0.53 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

Re: sunpinyin

> Anyone being familiar with "sunpinyin" please help with this "re-review": > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1043504 http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/sunpinyin looks bad. There has been no response to any of the tickets, neither before or after the EOL warning. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): > I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. > These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're worth a > new build. Should I commit them to the master branch? If so, I can > imagine a couple of issues: > > -

Re: llvm 3.4 in rawhide time

Rex Dieter wrote: > On 01/14/2014 08:11 PM, David Airlie wrote: >> It looks like OpenGTL is going to be the sticking point, >> >> upstream appears dead, > > I'll go poke upstream tomorrow, to verify (un)dead status or not. Confirmed with upstream that OpenGTL is indeed dead, and new versions of

Meeting minutes Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-01-14)

=== #fedora-meeting: env and stacks wg (2014-01-14) === Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:04:30 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-14/env_and_stacks.20

Re: dnf-0.4.11

On 14. 1. 2014 at 23:21:15, Peter Oliver wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > On 01/13/2014 09:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100 > >> > >> Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >>> On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > to be certain you can do "d

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. > >> These cleanups are trivial enough tha

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

On 2014-01-15, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > I'm trying to fix a problem with the git-svn package that causes it to > not pull in the proper perl dependencies (filed as rhbz #1026760). > (It's possible I've simply missed an important announcement, but I > didn't spot anything in the guidelines.) >

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

On 01/15/2014 08:28 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 01/15/2014 02:56 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Hi all, [I posted this to the packaging list a few days ago, but haven't gotten any responses, so I want to open this to a wider audience in the hope of getting some pointers to what I'm missing.] I'm

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

On 01/15/2014 08:46 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105159. That doesn't appear to be correct. Can you try again? It's this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 R

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

On 01/15/2014 01:56 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Hi all, [I posted this to the packaging list a few days ago, but haven't gotten any responses, so I want to open this to a wider audience in the hope of getting some pointers to what I'm missing.] I'm trying to fix a problem with the git-svn package