/me wants the ability to push force on *private* branches
2014/1/15 Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): > >> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. > >> These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're worth a > >> new build. Should I commit them to the master branch? If so, I can > >> imagine a couple of issues: > >> > >> - A provenpackager could kick off a rebuild for whatever reason (e.g. > >> dependency soname bump). That will (I think) inadvertently include my > >> changes. > >> - I need to think about whether to add a changelog entry or not. If > >> not, those changes might be included silently. If yes, then I need to > >> think about what to do about the revision number. > >> > >> The normal GIT approach would be to develop on another branch and to > >> merge when I want to build a new revision (the Fedora equivalent of > >> tagging a new release). Should Fedora provide branches like > >> master-devel, f20-devel, etc that store pending changes? > >> > >> Am I missing something really obvious here? > >> > >> --Andy > > > > Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches. > > Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have > > in your local git repo into dist-git, but there is no way how to delete > > it by myself. > > > > For example, I am using branches to keep my .spec file aligned with > > upstream development and I'd like to share it with other maintainers. > > But this .spec file should never build in Rawhide unless it is approved > > by FESCo. > > > > Could you please add support for private branches? I.e. the branch which > > starts by private- prefix could be pushed and deleted as well, non ff > > commit should be allowed. Actually, better would be if only master, fxx > > and elx are protected and others are unrestricted, but I am probably > > asking too much. > > For private branches I'd rather see something along fas/branch. > > With the '/' separator you can glob refspecs, and using your fas as a > prefix could enable automatic acls with less pain on the > infrastructure side (eg. allow anyone to manage and own private > branches at will). > > Dridi > > > Vít > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
