On 02/04/2013 10:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
https://ohjeezlinux.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/fedup-a-little-background/ ...
kinda. That's the best that I know of.
It lacks in details how I can put hook in upgrade.pre and upgrade.post.
What is the best practise here?
It would be nice if you
Le lundi 04 février 2013 à 20:35 -0500, Jon VanAlten a écrit :
> I don't have a horse in the default desktop race, being one of
> those weirdo tiling window manager users, which is possibly the
> exact reason why the idea of not having a default appeals to me.
> Maybe, if your objection is that th
Le mardi 05 février 2013 à 06:43 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
> I think you are putting too much emphasize on "first-timers" and seem to
> be forgetting the "Linux distro switcher-users". For them, easily
> finding the DE they know from their so-far used distro and easily
> switching between
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 07:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 07:19 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2013 05:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 02/05/2013 12:32 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:17:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
Martin Sourada wrote:
That's mostly how I understand the proposal. The goal for F19 is to get
it in and solve (potential) conflicts. It should probably either drop
the mentions of 4.0 or clearly state that 4.0 is going
Actually, the feedback I got at FOSDEM was to focus on packaging trunk
for
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I disagree. Fedora's lack of popularity is largely thanks to these issues.
>
> In this context, I feel the Cinnamon request rsp. the "give users a choice
> on DEs" attempts are part of an attempt to escape the at least one of the
> dead-end r
On 02/05/2013 07:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 07:19 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/05/2013 05:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
, but since you started it: OpenSUSE is doing just fine
doing exactly what I suggest (
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 07:19 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 05:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> >> , but since you started it: OpenSUSE is doing just fine
> >> doing exactly what I suggest (making people actually pick their d
commit ca80ece024039f4d3db41e2749d4e2cca45575d8
Author: Steven Roberts
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:42:24 2013 -0800
initial post review
perl-Mail-Procmail.spec | 65 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-
On Ter, 2013-01-29 at 17:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2013-01-29 at 01:52 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Yes, even then. udev will notice rules dropped there.
>
> OK I will test that
I just test it and doesn't assign USB devices.
But seeing what udev.service , udev-trigger.ser
On 02/05/2013 05:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
, but since you started it: OpenSUSE is doing just fine
doing exactly what I suggest (making people actually pick their download).
Their download button actually points to a selector, not dire
On 02/05/2013 05:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:35 -0500, Jon VanAlten wrote:
tl'dr: Please leave the straw man "new users won't be able to
decide" argument at the door, there's a way around it if we can
think about the *best* way to do it, rather than the *worst*.
It'
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:35 -0500, Jon VanAlten wrote:
>
>> tl'dr: Please leave the straw man "new users won't be able to
>> decide" argument at the door, there's a way around it if we can
>> think about the *best* way to do it, rather than
On 02/05/2013 04:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 21:49 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Honestly, what kind of benefit to the community do you expect from a
user who gets confused just by looking at a couple nice screenshots
and reading some brief explanation? Have you ever met s
I decided to check out Fedora again after a few years of using Kubuntu
after reading about the MySQL/MariaDB discussion. As a long time KDE
and Mac OS user I hope my first experience with gnome-shell will help
your discussion.
After getting Fedora installed and getting to the basic desktop I
hones
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ...and forcing a choice - possibly between several things they are not
> > familiar with either in detail or in nature - is equally wrong for many
> > people. Probably *more* people. Lots of people don't really care
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:35 -0500, Jon VanAlten wrote:
> tl'dr: Please leave the straw man "new users won't be able to
> decide" argument at the door, there's a way around it if we can
> think about the *best* way to do it, rather than the *worst*.
It's not really a straw man, though. Just about
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 19:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 21:49 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> > Honestly, what kind of benefit to the community do you expect from a
> > user who gets confused just by looking at a couple nice screenshots
> > and reading some brief explanat
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 21:49 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Honestly, what kind of benefit to the community do you expect from a
> user who gets confused just by looking at a couple nice screenshots
> and reading some brief explanation? Have you ever met such a person
> (incapable of understanding t
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:14 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >
>> > You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
>> > simple big green Download button, it star
Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:31:11 +
> James Hogarth wrote:
>> Might I suggest focusing on packaging 3.4.1 for rawhide and dealing
>> with the issues surrounding conflicts and if that gies well consider
>> the 4.0 release (or whatever lines up then) for F20?
> That's mostly ho
Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...and forcing a choice - possibly between several things they are not
> familiar with either in detail or in nature - is equally wrong for many
> people. Probably *more* people. Lots of people don't really care what
> desktop they get, and lots of people don't know what a
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You are putting the cart before the horse. You have to demonstrate its
> feasible to fix them before excluding future uses. I don't see how it is
> possible to fix the entire distribution to never use conflicts.
Aggressive renaming (see e.g. what I did to kdelibs to allo
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 6:53:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
>
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamso
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:14 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
> > simple big green Download button, it starts asking you questions about
> > what 'desktop environment' y
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
> simple big green Download button, it starts asking you questions about
> what 'desktop environment' you want?
>
As I said earlier in this thread, and as the Fedora Bo
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 19:17 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
> >> 215/262
> >>Cleanup:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 23:27 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:34:18 +0100
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Still I believe it is probably true as I doubt Fedora QA tests
> > compatibility with old hosts.
> >
> Fedora QA AFAIK tests on their own hardware only + virtual machines. I
>
To all interested,
This is the upstream announcement:
[NOTE: NSS 3.14.2 does not include a fix for the attacks described
in
the paper "Lucky Thirteen: Breaking the TLS and DTLS Record
Protocols"
(http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/).
An upcoming NSS
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 18:19 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 05:47 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
> >>> From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such
> >>> machines
> >>> because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
> >>> hardware.
> >>
> >> Cou
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 07:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > = Features/ApacheOpenOffice =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
> >
> > Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti
> >
> > Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora.
>
> A b
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 2. Can't we just not have a default?
> >
> > Not really. Others have touched on this, but the websites team really
> > wants the simplicity of a straightforward 'Download' link that gets you
> > a live image, and t
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:17:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
> >> 215/262
> >> Cleanup
On 02/04/2013 09:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
something.
Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:34:18 +0100
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Still I believe it is probably true as I doubt Fedora QA tests
> compatibility with old hosts.
>
Fedora QA AFAIK tests on their own hardware only + virtual machines. I
don't know about kernel upstream QA/devs though.
I'm running F18 on a
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:31:11 +
James Hogarth wrote:
> Might I suggest focusing on packaging 3.4.1 for rawhide and dealing
> with the issues surrounding conflicts and if that gies well consider
> the 4.0 release (or whatever lines up then) for F20?
That's mostly how I understand the proposal. Th
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:13 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Monday, February 04, 2013 15:04:36 David Malcolm wrote:
> > I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
> > results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
> >
> > My hope is that we'll have a server in
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 18:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 12:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, the other thing fedup does - and the other reason it's necessary
> > compared to a simple online yum upgrade - is provide a mechanism for
> > pretty much any package to hook in pretty
On Monday, February 04, 2013 15:04:36 David Malcolm wrote:
> I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
> results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
>
> My hope is that we'll have a server in the Fedora infrastructure for
> browsing results, marking thing
I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
My hope is that we'll have a server in the Fedora infrastructure for
browsing results, marking things as false positives etc.
However, for the purposes of simplicity du
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
My issue with Apache OpenOffice can be seen on LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/532665/ [...]
The Apache Software Foundation releases code under the Apache license;
they are, indeed, rather firm on that point. The Symphony repository,
though [...]
It's an outdated article
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:13:33 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
> > something.
> >
> > Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
> > does indicate that ABI has been
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Are packages really expected to ship .rules files? I don't think
> > so:
>
> Right, as I understand it, with the new system, applications are
> never ever supposed to ship such rules files.
Yes, th
On 02/04/2013 12:16 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 09:42 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and
make them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
Should we remove all the scripts from /usr/lib64/d
On 30/01/13 05:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Given that OpenOffice and LibreOffice share a common history (and not
that far back), are there going to be any efforts made to allow them
to be parallel-installable on the system, or will they be
fully-fledged Conf
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:16:36AM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> But the fact that the packages conflict should stand in the way.
>
>
> We don't have any guidelines that forbids it.
>
>
Just a note for people searching the mailing list later:
We do have Guidelines that prohibi
Hi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Lets pretend I'm still running Fedora 16 and every day I do yum-upgrade
> and not rebooted from day zero.
> I have exactly the same problem as during yum upgrade to next Fedora
> release.
>
> So we are ignoring this behaviour in middl
04.02.2013 13:28, Petr Šabata пишет:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:14:48AM +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 3 February 2013 17:20, Pavel wrote:
I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel.
I have released the ownership. You can claim them. Thank you.
I've taken dvtm as I've been more or less mainta
#5467: 2 Packages missing from mirrors
--+---
Reporter: limb | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 19 Alpha | Component: koji
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked
On 01/25/2013 12:12 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, you can ignore all of that, but then you have to think about what
you actually accomplished by your upgrade? You updated a couple of
libraries, and maybe managed to restart a few processes using them, but
for the rest of them the vulnerable op
commit 33aa8a21436966587bb3cac303a4e6bb7b2693fd
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Feb 4 17:31:16 2013 +0100
Sub-package Pod-Checker
perl-Pod-Parser.spec | 26 ++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Parser.spec b/perl-Pod-Parser.
commit 4218ec632154822d30632f9620f3b707492e2ab2
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Feb 4 17:11:56 2013 +0100
Sub-package Pod-Usage
perl-Pod-Parser.spec | 42 +-
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Parser.spec b/pe
On 02/04/2013 05:47 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
Could you provide more details? I have Fedora 18 running on several
32bit machines and am won
amit's response:
On (Sun) 03 Feb 2013 [10:30:49], Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 04:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
>>> Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson , Amit Shah
>>>
>>>
>>> Provide a paravirtual random number generator to virtual machines, to
I've not run into this on my rawhide laptop or rawhide vm today...
Perhaps some kind of race condition there?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It looks like openSUSE is providing both, MariaDB and MySQL, with MariaDB
as a default[1].
[1] - http://michal.hrusecky.net/2013/01/mysql-mariadb-and-opensuse-12-3/
2013/2/4 Honza Horak
> On 02/03/2013 06:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
>> 01.02.2013 00:42, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>>> I'd still
On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64215/262
Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64216/262
Cleanup:
On 01/29/2013 12:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, the other thing fedup does - and the other reason it's necessary
compared to a simple online yum upgrade - is provide a mechanism for
pretty much any package to hook in pretty much any action to be
performed as part of the upgrade. To be sure o
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
> 215/262
> Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64
> 216/262
> Cleanup: 1:findutils-4.5.10-7.fc19.x86_64
> > From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
> >because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
> >hardware.
>
> Could you provide more details? I have Fedora 18 running on several
> 32bit machines and am wondering what you are referring to.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907464
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resol
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:41:25PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It looks as if rpm-libs was also updated moments earlier to
> 4.11.0-0.beta1.3.
Correction: RPM was just updated from 4.11.0-0.beta1.3 to 4.11.0.1-1.
It was beta1.2 which was the dodgy version, but I didn't have
that installed
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and make
them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
Should we remove all the scripts from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE:
bak2db db2index dn2rdnldif2ldap
Le lundi 04 févr. 2013 à 14:42:35 (+0100), Jan Kratochvil a écrit :
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
> > and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
>
> From what I have reports even Fedo
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Yum is blocked on a futex:
I should add:
yum-3.4.3-57.fc19.noarch
Rawhide 64 bit, almost(!) up to date.
It looks as if rpm-libs was also updated moments earlier to
4.11.0-0.beta1.3.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization G
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64215/262
Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64216/262
Cleanup: 1:findutils-4.5.10-7.fc19.x86_64 217/262
Cleanup: spice-server-0.12.2-2.fc19.x86_64
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
> something.
>
> Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
> does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been done so in the
> past without bumpin
On 02/03/2013 03:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:54:23 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Looks like going from glpk 4.47 to 4.48 bumped the soname from
libglpk.so.0 to libglpk.so.33. Something tells me this was not expected
and is not correct. Can this be verified?
Could
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> that are built at kernel build time? the issue with building it at
> build time was making sure we knew exactly what sourcs we needed to
> ship to match all the binaries in the initramfs. the initramfs's we
> build and ship as part of teh in
commit 847d97c16d16fee47da03deef3335132fca001c3
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:13:14 2013 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec b/perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec
Summary of changes:
1d5afe2... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
565c469... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
d224f0d... Upstream update. (*)
847d97c... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Rebuilt by me:
>
> 4ti2
Actually, 4ti2 has been obsoleted by latte-integrale. I've reminded
the maintainer that he needs to retire this package.
--
Jerry James
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:23:45 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 02:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
> >because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
> >hardware.
>
> Could you provide more
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Are packages really expected to ship .rules files? I don't think so:
Right, as I understand it, with the new system, applications are never ever
supposed to ship such rules files.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁
On 02/04/2013 08:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I just realized that there is a change to the way polkit is packaged in
f19 that spin maintainers should be aware of: the polkit package is just
the service, which only provides the default policy as specified in the
action defin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 04 Feb 2013 04:56:23 AM EST, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Now that I have your attention...
>
> Fedora Maven package is currently a mix of upstream release and our changes
> that
> we need for building RPMs. We can clean it up, but we need to
Am 04.02.2013 15:47, schrieb John Reiser:
>> = Features/DracutHostOnly =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly
>
>> ... This results in a very big initramfs, which takes a long time to
>> load on system start and a long time to create on kernel updates.
>
> For speed in cre
commit d224f0dc1f3216ee2b83d20a61b249750e61e480
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:06:19 2013 +0100
Upstream update.
- Modernize spec.
- Drop obsoletes/provides %{name}-utils.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec | 19 +++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-vFile-asData:
39fad8c1ca12d44a1bde955f74b3d470 Text-vFile-asData-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907124
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this ma
around to last week, mostly.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130204
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Criteria Revision
2. Test C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907124
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this ma
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
> = Features/DracutHostOnly =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly
> ... This results in a very big initramfs, which takes a long time to
> load on system start and a long time to create on kernel updates.
For speed in creating an initramfs, please consider Requiring
the pack
Apologies for the accidental send before...
On 4 February 2013 12:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>>> * What benefit does this package have over LibreOffice, to justify
>>> carrying
>>>2 packages doing essentially the same thing?
>>>
>>
>> They are indeed two productivi
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
2013/2/4 Richard W.M. Jones :
> Are any changes required to C erl_interface / ei.h users? I mean
> at the source level, not just recompiling.
Nope, no changes are necessary.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 4 February 2013 12:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> * What benefit does this package have over LibreOffice, to justify
>> carrying
>>2 packages doing essentially the same thing?
>>
>
> They are indeed two productivity suites, but they are evolving in
> different direct
On 02/04/2013 02:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such
commit 5c4099caa90e7f4fac6ba0d077cda1bd51f36410
Author: Bill Pemberton
Date: Mon Feb 4 09:16:39 2013 -0500
Update to version 1.026
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Regexp-Grammars.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletio
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Regexp-Grammars:
6d75f337154bbbcd754e75ba7dd48bdd Regexp-Grammars-1.026.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Summary of changes:
f3bdf5f... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On 02/04/2013 06:28 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>> I love GNOME 3 and detest KDE 4. I've tried MATE and Cinnamon on both
>> Linux Mint and Fedora and don't really see the point of either of them
>> as long as GNOME 3 offers fallback mode.
>
> Fallback mode is going away
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> Current:
> em1 -> enp2s0
That is expected, and actually the right thing to do. Udev cannot
apply such "it looks like it is embedded" heuristics for very
practical technical reasons. There is no reliable information about
that on the system,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:29:04PM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> As a part of the planned Erlang upgrade to R16 I updated it to the
> recently released R16A (Release Candidate). I'm expecting a lot of
> breakage. Unfortunately all incompatibilities are hidden from end
> users, and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907464
Bug ID: 907464
Summary: cpanm bundle lots of library and is not listed on
fesco page
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-App-cpanminus
Seve
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
> and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > - Cinnamon started out as 'using GNOME components', but it is [now] a
> full
> > fork of mutter, gnome-shell and nautilus, at least, and bug-fixes are not
> > going either way...
>
> Those are applications which form
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
