It looks like openSUSE is providing both, MariaDB and MySQL, with MariaDB as a default[1].
[1] - http://michal.hrusecky.net/2013/01/mysql-mariadb-and-opensuse-12-3/ 2013/2/4 Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com> > On 02/03/2013 06:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> 01.02.2013 00:42, James Hogarth wrote: >> >>> I'd still say yes since the context of this discussion is mysql 5.5 to >>> mariadb 5.5 and nothing to do with mysql 5.6 and the time for mariadb >>> 10/11 to become fully compatible to what's brought to the table in >>> that which was the relevant discussion in those blog posts... >>> >>> And if someone is using upstream themselves they are responsible to >>> manage that ... and assuming the versioned obsoletes is used as >>> discussed yesterday then there would be no accidental overwrite and >>> compatibility if mysql-5.6 is on the system and the admin updated >>> without thinking... >>> >> Is it really hard maintain both? May be it have worth also package and >> support Percona with XtraDB? >> > > The question of maintaining both will be probably re-evaluate in the > future again, there may be some new opinions for any way. > > Speaking about XtraDB -- MariaDB includes this engine so feel free to test > it. > > > Honza > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> > -- Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior http://about.me/henriquejunior
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
