Re: webkitgtk3 and webkitgtk both installed

2012-03-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > hi, > > I made a spin with gimp pre-installed and found that webkitgtk and > webkitgtk3 both installed > > the old webkitgtk is installed only because of gimp > > is there any plan to port gimp to webkitgtk3 It would require the entire app

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > I think ideally we'd just change the defaults in our kernel so that we > ship with no default sysctl.conf file. Reconfiguring the kernel defaults > all the time out-of-the-box sounds pretty suboptimal to me. It would be better to keep upstream kernel d

[Test-Announce] 2012-03-19 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2012-03-19 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time once more. We're deep into Beta cycle now, and we have Test Days to report also. T

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Aaron Faanes wrote: > >>> We used the -qt4 postfix (which is a common practice among most distros >>> these days) to allow for a parallel-installable qt3. >>> >> >> Ah, I figured it was something like that. I couldn't find it using the >> follow

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > >> Adam Williamson wrote: > >> > >>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver > >>> against a d

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver >>> against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works >>> fine

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Aaron Faanes wrote: >> We used the -qt4 postfix (which is a common practice among most distros >> these days) to allow for a parallel-installable qt3. >> > > Ah, I figured it was something like that. I couldn't find it using the > following: > > $ yum provides '*/bin/*-qt3' > Loaded plugins: aut

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Aaron Faanes
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Aaron Faanes wrote: > > > I was wondering why Qt compiler tools (qmake, moc, uic, etc.) are > > installed with each name suffixed with -qt4 (qmake-qt4, moc-qt4). This > > diverges from how upstream names its tools (specifically, without qt4 >

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Aaron Faanes wrote: > I was wondering why Qt compiler tools (qmake, moc, uic, etc.) are > installed with each name suffixed with -qt4 (qmake-qt4, moc-qt4). This > diverges from how upstream names its tools (specifically, without qt4 > added), so it caused me a little confusion when these tools app

Re: Fedora is featuring on GSoC 2012

2012-03-16 Thread Harish Pillay
Buddhike - | I am delighted to announce that the Fedora Project has been accepted | for the GSoC 2012 program[0]. | This would be the 7th time where the Fedora project represents the | program since 2005. | | The students' application procedure and other relevant information | will be published

Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Aaron Faanes
I was wondering why Qt compiler tools (qmake, moc, uic, etc.) are installed with each name suffixed with -qt4 (qmake-qt4, moc-qt4). This diverges from how upstream names its tools (specifically, without qt4 added), so it caused me a little confusion when these tools appeared to be missing. My solu

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Glen Turner
On 2012-03-15 Dan Williams wrote: > The only effect this checking will have is to change NetworkManager's > state from CONNECTED_GLOBAL to CONNECTED_SITE or CONNECTED_LOCAL. It > doesn't do anything odd like disconnect and retry some other connection, > which wouldn't make much sense. It just cha

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:40, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 03/16/2012 02:28 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > >>but this does not make sense > >> > >>the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Johannes Lips
On 03/16/2012 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Tardon wrote: How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable? One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager. But anyone with FAS account

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver > > against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works > > fine if you use a non-debug kernel. > > Not really: https://bugzil

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: > yes, but the really bug is that "sysctl.conf" is not shipped empty > > it should be the global place where the admin can override ANY setting > from any other file/package and so it is correct to apply systcl.conf > as last item - as said only if it would be shipped empty +

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver > against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works > fine if you use a non-debug kernel. Not really: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751891 Anything dlopening libGL direc

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > That might be an appropriate time to try and work some kind of > connection between Bugzilla and Bodhi. But I still think it might be > very difficult to do; it's very difficult to parse a freeform Bugzilla > comment That's why it's best to leave this to a human! Software

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
David Tardon wrote: > How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and > thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable? > > One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager. > But anyone with FAS account can give karma to an update... +1,

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
> > > If 00-foo sets something to value A, and 99-bar sets it to B, > and B < A, foo may not function correctly. > > This isn't an ordering problem, it's an exclusivity problem, because > sysctls are system-wide, not per-package. > this applies to every thing, if 00-foo sets foo as the best font

webkitgtk3 and webkitgtk both installed

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
hi, I made a spin with gimp pre-installed and found that webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 both installed the old webkitgtk is installed only because of gimp is there any plan to port gimp to webkitgtk3 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 17:01 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > > > >> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> > >>> >

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: >> >>> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ? > > that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take > effect > eg. 99-foobar.conf > > sometimes we have conventions for number

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:33AM +0100, Emanuel Rietveld wrote: > On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >Adam Williamson wrote: > >>Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a > >>start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not. > > > >It would be trivial if these dec

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> And both machines pass rpm -Va just fine. So the binaries should, um, >> be the same. > + >> It is a core from yesterday, > > There can be difference one of the machines has the files prelink-ed while the > other one does not.  prelink runs

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
> What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ? that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take effect eg. 99-foobar.conf sometimes we have conventions for number ranges like this http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Choosing_a_

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
* Petr Pisar > How does fd00::/16 differes from 10.0.0.0/8? Why getting site scope > address in IPv4 is Ok, while getting such address in IPv6 is considered > as failure? Just a little comment regarding the terminology used here. The terms "global", "site", and "link" scope have very specific and

Fedora is featuring on GSoC 2012

2012-03-16 Thread Buddhike Kurera
Hello, I am delighted to announce that the Fedora Project has been accepted for the GSoC 2012 program[0]. This would be the 7th time where the Fedora project represents the program since 2005. The students' application procedure and other relevant information will be published soon. If you are in

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi Dan, * Dan Williams > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: > >> That is true, however, if IPv6 completes first, and IPv4 (still running >> in the background) eventually ends up failing, the *entire connection* >> will be torn down - including the perfectly working IPv6 conne

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said: > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > > > > > Why not? > > > > > > Fo

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Dave Jones said: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > > > Why not? > > > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that ma

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > Why not? > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use > of IPC and needs the msgmni a

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > > On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same p

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 03/16/2012 05:15 PM, John Ellson wrote: > On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: >> Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : >>> Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having >>> to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote: > On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : > >> Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having > >> to find some other weird place to indicate that a f

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote: > On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : > >> Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having > >> to find some other weird place to indicate that a f

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: >> >> >>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem. >>> >>> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600 >>> >>> >>

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > > > Why not? > > > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that mak

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
* Dan Williams > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:47 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: >> The current behaviour of tearing down working IPv6 connections is >> just painful IMHO. > > If the IPv6 method is "ignore" (which is the current default) then NM > shouldn't be touching IPv6 stuff on that interface; kernel

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:56 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: >> On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? >>> >>> Good question, we deviate from upstream default: >>> http://wiki.apache

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > Why not? > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgm

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
ill investigate. > > > > kevin > > Thanks. > > Actually I do see an error in critpath.log, > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20120316/logs/critpath.log > > Maybe that explains? I refactored the scripts that build rawhide this week to enable pri

[perl-XML-XPath] 680418 - missing man page for xpath applied debian patch, which added POD into xpath code, but also

2012-03-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 06198004f6132c58258cfdf3d930f05f1b784c4b Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Fri Mar 16 17:41:28 2012 +0100 680418 - missing man page for xpath applied debian patch, which added POD into xpath code, but also fix debian bug(#185292) perl-XML-XPath.spec | 11 ++- xpath.man.patch

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread David Quigley
On 03/16/2012 04:56, Matej Cepl wrote: On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? # If you're having issues with author

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: /etc/sysctl.conf is interpreted after /etc/sysctl.d is. The former hence overrides settings in the latter. and Muayyad AlSadi responded: > but this does not make sense > > the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default

[Bug 680418] missing man page for xpath

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680418 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, John Ellson wrote: >  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.9.3.995-0.6.git20120314.fc17 > > The update contains fixes for three problems:  800690, 798102, 802540 > > I contributed to the first bug, 800690, and duly tested and reported "works >

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:56 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> Why and why just us? > > > > Good question, we deviate from upstream default: > > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout > > Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? > > #

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread John Ellson
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is a real pain. Have you tried fedora-easy-karma

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default values. Why shouldn't they be able to

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 15:16 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:13:31PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > > > > > As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the > > > /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of > > > them is sys

Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-16 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
As a part of the ABRT Backtrace Deduplication Service[1], we are planning to close and reassign old ABRT bugs in bugzilla. Bugs which were found to have similar backtraces will be closed as duplicates of the bug with most CCed users. If the bugs originate from different components and their backtra

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:13:31PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > > > As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the > > /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of > > them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just > >

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/16 Bryn M. Reeves : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> Perhaps and stupid question: >>> >>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added >>> to .gitignore: So

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Stijn Hoop
.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162652.html > > It looks like they composed, but didn't send email for some reason. > > Will investigate. > > kevin Thanks. Actually I do see an error in critpath.log, http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20120

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/16 Jon Ciesla : > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> Perhaps and stupid question: >>> >>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: >>> Uploaded and added to .gitignore: >>> Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to com

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> Perhaps and stupid question: >> >> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added >> to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> Perhaps and stupid question: >> >> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: >> Uploaded and added to .gitignore: >> Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file >> >> I do

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Synacek
On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Perhaps and stupid question: > > After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: > Uploaded and added to .gitignore: > Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file > > I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignor

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.03.2012 15:21, schrieb Michal Schmidt: > Dne 16.3.2012 14:40, Michal Hlavinka napsal: >> As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the >> /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of >> them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this i

Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and then it asks for commit them? Is it something that I

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne 16.3.2012 14:40, Michal Hlavinka napsal: As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just default value and yet, no package can

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
> > As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the > /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of > them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just > default value and yet, no package can change it by placing its file in > /

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:39 +0100 Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they > failing? If so where can I check? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162652.html It looks like they composed, but didn't send email for s

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 03/16/2012 02:28 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either kernel defaults or distro defaults) because the other choice is to use %post an

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > but this does not make sense > > the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either > kernel defaults or distro defaults) > because the other choice is to use %post and sed > eg. let's say I made a firewall pa

rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they failing? If so where can I check? Regards, --Stijn -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either kernel defaults or distro defaults) because the other choice is to use %post and sed eg. let's say I made a firewall package that needs to enable forwarding, it would put it in a sysctl.d what do

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:40, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > hi everybody, > > in recent fedora releases I can see we have /etc/sysctl.d/ > > but does it really get evaluated > > eg. let's put in /etc/sysctl.d/00-ojuba-enabled-sysrq.conf > > kernel.sysrq = 1 > > and keep it 0 in /etc/sy

does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
hi everybody, in recent fedora releases I can see we have /etc/sysctl.d/ but does it really get evaluated eg. let's put in /etc/sysctl.d/00-ojuba-enabled-sysrq.conf kernel.sysrq = 1 and keep it 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf kernel.sysrq = 0 then reboot then type sysctl kernel.sysrq it was reported

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Matej Cepl
On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? # If you're having issues with authorization and your permissions are # corre

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:01:59 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > However, I would suggest that any "make check"-spawned process that > does not terminate is a test script bug that should be fixed upstream, I agree. New testcases are reviewed with this rule in mind. But the existing testcases are handle

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Michael Scherer
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : > Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having > to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is > a real pain. Have you tried fedora-easy-karma ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_E

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:16:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> That works very well. However, the base64 output in my first log was >> corrupt, due to some asynchronous output (stderr about job completion) >> that was emitted in the middle of the big base64 block. >> Adding the

F-17 Branched report: 20120316 changes

2012-03-16 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Mar 16 08:15:27 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

Re: Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Niels de Vos
On 03/16/2012 11:21 AM, Anish Patil wrote: Hi, The description of the bug says " With English-typing-booster enabled on gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text". English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. Any thoughts or comments regrading solution

Re: Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/16 Anish Patil : > > Hi, > > The description of the bug says " With English-typing-booster enabled on > gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text". > English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. > > Any thoughts or comments regrading solution wil

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:16:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > That works very well. However, the base64 output in my first log was > corrupt, due to some asynchronous output (stderr about job completion) > that was emitted in the middle of the big base64 block. > Adding the "sync; sleep 10" part below

Re: libdb-5.3.15 update with soname bump

2012-03-16 Thread Paul Howarth
On 03/16/2012 09:17 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi all, very soon I'm going to update libdb to 5.3.15 in rawhide. Perhaps now would be a good time to make a concerted effort to move all db4 users over to libdb to avoid problems like these: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768846 (ht

Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Anish Patil
Hi, The description of the bug says " With English-typing-booster enabled on gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text". English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. Any thoughts or comments regrading solution will be appreciated. Regards, Anish Patil. -

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:00:59AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:45:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> > >>> > I suspect the answer is 'no', but is is possible to access or download >>> > the build directory of a fail

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:00:59AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:45:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > >> > I suspect the answer is 'no', but is is possible to access or download >> > the build directory of a failed build, on the Fedora Koj

libdb-5.3.15 update with soname bump

2012-03-16 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi all, very soon I'm going to update libdb to 5.3.15 in rawhide. Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich --

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Emanuel Rietveld
On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not. It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed on both (i.e. the maintainer of the p