Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> said:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
> > 
> > Why not?
> > 
> > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
> > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default
> > values.  Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM?
> 
> Where did I say they shouldn't?

You mean other than the quoted line?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to