Once upon a time, Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> said: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> said: > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > > > Why not? > > > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use > > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default > > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM? > > What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ?
Well, that's already a possibility with lots of the ".d" type solutions, so I don't see why sysctl.d is any different. -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
