> What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ?
that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take effect eg. 99-foobar.conf sometimes we have conventions for number ranges like this http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Choosing_a_ruleset_numeral_prefix 50 User overrides 51 Local system overrides ... On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> said: > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> said: > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> said: > > > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > > > > > > > Why not? > > > > > > > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive > use > > > > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the > default > > > > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their > RPM? > > > > > > Where did I say they shouldn't? > > > > You mean other than the quoted line? > > My appologies; I misread "sysrq" as "sysctl". > -- > Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
