R: Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread pinto.e...@gmail.com
Messaggio originale Da: drago01 Inviato: 22/07/2011, 19:16 A: Development discussions related to Fedora Oggetto: Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Re

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-07-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 07/14/2011 01:07 PM, seth vidal wrote: > googling around gets me info on how magnet links work. Now, what tools > do we have in fedora to generate them and the Distributed Hash Tables. Sorry for the delay again. There's no tool required. As long as you know the hash of the torrent you can mak

Re: Handling lamson

2011-07-22 Thread Praveen Kumar
the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense. > The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of > the > odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally > just him talking about his idea of an ideal world. > > You may

Re: Call for Test Days for Fedora 16

2011-07-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:23 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On the week of Aug 7 David Shein and I will be at POSSE-RIT teaching > professors how open source communities work. On the Wednesay afternoon > and Thursday of that week, the participants are jumping in to a few open > source pr

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > in the past there were real developers which was able to ah, the True Scotsman rears its head! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/22/2011 05:02 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: I don't have it backwards - my day job is to work on exactly getting this kind of cutting edge feature out to end users. Which feature of this magnitute have you put out to your users? Serously if you have some motivation tips to get things moving I a

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.07.2011 00:17, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > I'd like to suggest: > > a) Please avoid getting personal, stick to technical arguments/issues. it is not my intention to get personally and hurt anybody as person, really! i try to get borked things fixed which i can not fix by myself and had to l

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
I'd like to suggest: a) Please avoid getting personal, stick to technical arguments/issues. b) Is there any further useful discussion to be had in this thread? Perhaps it's time to give it a rest for the weekend (or longer). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing l

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 23:18, schrieb Michal Schmidt: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:48:29 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: >> and the same guy who pushed "pulseaudio" in a total unuseable state >> to fedora instead finish his work and push it after that does is >> the maintainer of systemd - so maybe if we would not

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:48:29 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > and the same guy who pushed "pulseaudio" in a total unuseable state > to fedora instead finish his work and push it after that does is > the maintainer of systemd - so maybe if we would not have the > expierience how long it takes until the

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 19:38, schrieb Steve Clark: > I know it is very frustrating to me when stuff that worked now all of sudden > doesn't > because somebody decided that we have better, faster, newer way of doing > things so lets > do it! > > Sound in fedora a few years ago under went this exact sc

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 19:16, schrieb drago01: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald >>> wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: > On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Rein

Re: Handling lamson

2011-07-22 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:26:34PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to package funnel, a software for online submissions and > voting of talks as part of the FUDCon India effort. One if its > dependencies is flask-mail[0] and in turn, lamson[1] is a dependency > for it which was

Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?

2011-07-22 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:27:58PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): > > > Ding Yi Chen wrote: > > >> Hi list, > > >> I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. > > >> >

2011-07-22 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #2 - recap

2011-07-22 Thread James Laska
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f1

No specific armv7hl VFAD today

2011-07-22 Thread Jon Masters
Hello, I'm traveling this week, so didn't make any specific plans to host the VFAD earlier today. Sorry for not announcing that. Of course, there's no reason to not build and contribute bits by joining us on #fedora-arm at any time, and by following the instructions: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Starting user UIDs at 1000 - please check your packages

2011-07-22 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On 2011-07-20 9:18, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewis  wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human >>> UIDs of 500, 501, etc..? >>> >>> Do they suddenly become

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Steve Clark
On 07/22/2011 01:16 PM, drago01 wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully syst

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > hopefully systemd will aslo

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 07/22/2011 12:47 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: >> MD, NFS, clustering have complicated and complex needs. The systemd team - >> not >> just the developers of those subsystems - need to be directly engaged and >> proactive in getting all of these

Handling lamson

2011-07-22 Thread Praveen Kumar
Hi, I am planning to package funnel, a software for online submissions and voting of talks as part of the FUDCon India effort. One if its dependencies is flask-mail[0] and in turn, lamson[1] is a dependency for it which was already in Fedora briefly but now it's orphaned due to some resistance fro

RE: FYI: Debian multiarch project

2011-07-22 Thread Jonathan Masters
I brought this up previously in the context of the Fedora ARM bootstrap. It will be one of topics in the writeup. -- Sent from my phone - message formatted and/or shortened accordingly. -Original Message- From: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com] Received: Wednesday, 20 Jul 2011, 8:

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > MD, NFS, clustering have complicated and complex needs. The systemd team - not > just the developers of those subsystems - need to be directly engaged and > proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly I think you actually go

Re: Packages affected by RPM 4.9 filtering [was: News from rebuild]

2011-07-22 Thread Petr Sabata
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:27:07PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/22/2011 03:56 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Can we have some detailed documentation of "rpm 4.9's dependency > filtering and some detailed explanations of what we are supposed to do? > > So far, I am far from having understood w

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 07/22/2011 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 yea

[perl-Perl-Critic] Reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in perl-5.14.1-182

2011-07-22 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 370bf786cde4a34186eb5f5bb2e81bbd51c387ed Author: Paul Howarth Date: Fri Jul 22 16:08:30 2011 +0100 Reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in perl-5.14.1-182 perl-Perl-Critic.spec |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl

[perl-DBIx-Class] Fix the filters for perl(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker*)

2011-07-22 Thread Petr Sabata
commit 025516f2a52b8ba498b217350a5afe02d6803353 Author: Petr Sabata Date: Fri Jul 22 17:49:37 2011 +0200 Fix the filters for perl(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker*) perl-DBIx-Class.spec |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec b/perl-DB

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: >>> On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 10:24, schrieb Karel Zak: > I hope that umount(8) in Fedora-17 will support --recursive option well, more important is to fix it generally for F15 who is responsible for that? where should a bugreport filed? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailin

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 04:01, schrieb Doug Ledford: > They have some valid reasons for wanting to avoid the risk of rendering > machines inoperable or insecure because something didn't start and while making a dist-upgrade to F16 where the whole system is changed comes a helping angel or god himself hold

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

2011-07-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.07.2011 09:31, schrieb Tomas Mraz: > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 21.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Karel Zak: >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:09:08AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: /proc/mounts does not seem to distinguish bind mounts - so this may ha

[perl-DBIx-Class] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

2011-07-22 Thread Petr Sabata
commit 9cb2339a3e78e87375d3b316f2326271a39af0bf Author: Petr Sabata Date: Fri Jul 22 16:56:50 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 24 +++- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec b/perl-

F15 updates push needed

2011-07-22 Thread Orion Poplawski
It seems there has been no F15 update push since Jul 18. Is this expected? We need a push to fix the thunderbird-lightning requirement on thunderbird 5.0. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mit

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: >> On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit >>> did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release >>> including the c

[perl-Kwiki-NewPage] Add IO::All BR

2011-07-22 Thread Petr Sabata
commit e1e4ba141fd8bfe4e597f36dd3c14fc6d8497908 Author: Petr Sabata Date: Fri Jul 22 15:37:45 2011 +0200 Add IO::All BR perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec b/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec index 9a4f4a5.

Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?

2011-07-22 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): > > Ding Yi Chen wrote: > >> Hi list, > >> I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. > >> > >> I live in time zone GMT+10. > >> On 0:10, 18th July, > >> I wrote my ch

[perl-Class-Prototyped] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

2011-07-22 Thread Petr Sabata
commit 7d6203c465dcc7166341a8d9a92cfd3e75d1884e Author: Petr Pisar Date: Fri Jul 22 14:30:47 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-Class-Prototyped.spec | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec b/perl-Clas

Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?

2011-07-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): > Ding Yi Chen wrote: >> Hi list, >> I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. >> >> I live in time zone GMT+10. >> On 0:10, 18th July, >> I wrote my changelog as: >> * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. >> >> >> And then run rpmlint, w

Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?

2011-07-22 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
Ding Yi Chen wrote: > Hi list, > I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. > > I live in time zone GMT+10. > On 0:10, 18th July, > I wrote my changelog as: > * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. > > > And then run rpmlint, which give me: > : E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 >

Review of libmodbus package

2011-07-22 Thread Stéphane Raimbault
Hello, I've just submit a request to review my package for libmodbus. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724942 This library implements the Modbus protocol which is often used in Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), power meter and various industrial devices. My library is used by many c

Re: new cg-manager gui tool for managin cgroups

2011-07-22 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:32:08AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > a) Your app can just place a simple unit file in /run/systemd/system, and >issue Reload() on the manager D-Bus object. Then, you can start it >via D-Bus, and stop it, and introspect it, and all other >operations. When

Re: new cg-manager gui tool for managin cgroups

2011-07-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:58:50PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:17:03PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Thu, 21.07.11 15:52, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > I think its a question of do we want to make users go to a bunch of > > > > dif

Re: new cg-manager gui tool for managin cgroups

2011-07-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:15:46PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:53:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 21.07.11 16:36, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > > IIRC, you

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-22 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/22/2011 02:01 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/20/2011 6:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 20.07.2011 22:06, schrieb Doug Ledford: >>> On 07/15/2011 05:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

2011-07-22 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:55:54AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 22.07.2011 00:39, schrieb Karel Zak: > > > * bind mounts are represented as /A -> /B dependence, reality is > > /A -> device, /B -> device (and /A could be umounted, moved, ...) > > this is not generally true # mount /dev/sdb1

self introduction

2011-07-22 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, as I am trying to put a new package on Fedora as a new maintainer, I've seen on the Fedora wiki that I should introduce myself on the dev list. SO, let's go I manage the developments on a BioInformatics platform in France. While my previous experience was on Telecommunications (Mobile and

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

2011-07-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 21.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Karel Zak: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:09:08AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > >> /proc/mounts does not seem to distinguish bind mounts - so this may > >> have to be a kernel change and perhaps adding /p