the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense.
> The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of
> the
> odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally
> just him talking about his idea of an ideal world.
>
> You may package this. You may want to let upstream know that you have and
> that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our
> bugzilla/IRC channels.
> Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python
> applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and
> those really should be named python-*. Especially nowadays when we build
> python3 versions of a lot of modules. From the sound of the review request
> ("I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]") this should probably be
> named python-lamson.
>
> -Toshio
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
Thanks Toshio
I will mail to upstream about lamson package.
Thanks and Regards,
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
