Hi there!
Could someone please review these tickets? I'll be happy to review their
tickets in return :)
[1] FreeMedForms - An open Electronic Medical Record Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707002
[2] dcm4che - A DICOM implementation in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:12:39AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > > However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora
> > > 10 and upgrade paths are gua
On 06/02/2011 05:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. I want people to be
> able to test IPv6*on their local LAN only* next Wednesday with the
> minimum amount of fuss.
In that case: Since Fedora defaults to link-local, they would have to
run radvd loc
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora
> > 10 and upgrade paths are guaranteed by Fedora policy only from
> > F(N-1) to F(N), I'd say that there
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:51:55 +1000
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to
> > hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10 (commit 3c3f6d12edb) to undo 0.4.7 update.
> > That epoch bump was limited to F-10, no other
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:51:55 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to
> hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10 (commit 3c3f6d12edb) to undo 0.4.7 update.
> That epoch bump was limited to F-10, no other branches saw it afaict.
>
> So anyone who ever installed the F-10 packa
Jeremy pinged me about an issue with the hulahop package (#574484).
Disclaimer: I'm not the maintainer of the package but Simon has been a bit
quiet on this bug. I was opened for F12 over a year ago.
hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10
(commit 3c3f6d12edb) to
I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. I want people to be
able to test IPv6 *on their local LAN only* next Wednesday with the
minimum amount of fuss.
They can just test that it works between two machines, one Fedora, one
might be Fedora or it might be something else like Windows acting as
On 06/02/2011 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Given that I mostly don't know about IPv6, what's the best way for
> people to test IPv6 next Wednesday, given what I think are the
> following common limitations:
>
> - they'll have one (or two if we're lucky) Fedora machines
They could connec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ocaml-findlib should require ocaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710290
Summary: ocaml-findlib should require ocaml
Product: Fedora
Neal Becker wrote:
> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
I generally do something like:
%if 0%{?fedora} > NN
%global have_foo_MMM 1
%endif
%if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
BuildRequires: foo-devel >= MMM
%else
BuildRequires: foo-devel < MMM
%endif
…
%prep
%if 0%{?have_foo_
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:53:25PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Setting up 6to4 involves at least joining a service like sixxs, which
> > even if free takes a certain amount of time and effort.
>
> The method you quoted does not require
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
rdv changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Setting up 6to4 involves at least joining a service like sixxs, which
> even if free takes a certain amount of time and effort.
The method you quoted does not require an account with a tunnel provider.
There is an RFC giving provisions for globa
On 2 Jun 2011 15:32, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
> > to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
>
> Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
I believe it has to r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:11:47PM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
> > LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
> > IPv6 assigned pre
On 06/03/2011 12:47 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Moving it to default in @system-tools seems fine to me as a first step.
> However, that's not in the 'default' install (but it would place it on
> the install media.) If it's wanted in the default install, the @base
> group is the best place for it (
On 06/02/2011 01:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is it set as executable? If not the department scan will ignore it.
Yes, it is executable:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=2556409&filename=/usr/bin/dtrace
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Jun 2, 2011 9:26 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts "#!/usr/bin/python".
> Usually this leads to an implicit "Requires: /usr/bin/python", but for
> some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, and F13
> builds from the same spec
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Aurimas Černius wrote:
>
>
> Gnote gives status icon 2 seconds to appear and shows Search All Notes
> window as main, if that fails. If you somehow delay the gnote start
> (wrap to some script for example) until desktop components like tray are
> available, it shou
Hi,
Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts "#!/usr/bin/python".
Usually this leads to an implicit "Requires: /usr/bin/python", but for
some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, and F13
builds from the same spec required python as expected.
The rawhide build which mis
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem
> is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to
> your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you
> can nest directories which you can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
>> It doesn't integrate into GNOME 3 any more, since it relies on a panel
>> applet and GNOME 3 doesn't support those.
>
> It seems to work really well in Gnome 3. The "applet" sits down in the
> notification bar (like empathy) and is almost
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:48:36 PM David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:53 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but
> > your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still
> > exists that the unifi
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:44:46PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Josef Bacik said:
> > These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
> > specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
> > and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext4 yet,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
> LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
> IPv6 assigned prefix?
If you do want an assigned prefix, or real connectivity and not want
t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2011-06-02 15:04:08 EDT ---
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.800.2-1.el6 has been pushed to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705308
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-02
15:00:15 EDT ---
perlbrew-0.22-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stab
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, nodata wrote:
> Hello,
>
> dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
>
> The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
>
> dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
> fullscreen.
>
> What's the procedure to get th
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2011, 12:16 -0400 schrieb Bernd Stramm:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jo
nodata wrote:
> Hello,
>
> dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
>
> The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
>
> dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
> fullscreen.
>
> What's the procedure to get the package removed?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hello,
dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
fullscreen.
What's the procedure to get the package removed?
Thanks.
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> I wonder if the btrfs solution would be that you would just use raw
> partitions and not use btrfs for it.
>
> eg
> /dev/sda1 is /boot
> /dev/sda2 is swap
> /dev/sda3 is btrfs /
> /dev/sda4 is VM-01
> /dev/sda5 is VM-02
That would work, but that los
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:44, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Josef Bacik said:
>> These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
>> specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
>> and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext4 yet, but we aren't
Once upon a time, Josef Bacik said:
> These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
> specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
> and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext4 yet, but we aren't 2-3
> times slower any more, maybe at the most we're 20
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 01:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
>> specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
>> and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext
On 06/02/2011 01:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>
> These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
> specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
> and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext4 yet, but we aren't 2-3
> times slower any more, maybe at the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529172
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
13:36:35 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548097
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548098
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
13:18:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
--- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
13:13:55 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of li
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
>> default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't
>> believe 3-4 months
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:16:13PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548097
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
13:06:34 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548098
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
13:06:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555849
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
12:52:21 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
12:33:45 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of li
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:32:21AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> > +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
>> > to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
>> Sounds like a bug instead of
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > > The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have acquired
Neal Becker writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Neal Becker writes:
>
>> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
>
> You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
> put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll
On 06/02/2011 12:06 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> How about this evil untested recursive invocation of rpm?
>
> %prep
> %configure
>
> package=glibc
> minversion=2.13.89
>
> if [ $(
> rpm -q --queryformat '%{version}\n' $package |
> cat - <(echo $minversion) |
> sort -V |
> head
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2011-06-02
12:08:41 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of lif
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:06:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> ) = "$minversion" ]; then
That test should be != instead of =
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful m
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have acquired IPv6 addresses, eg:
> > >
> > > $ ip addr show eth0
> > > 2: eth0: mtu 1500
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:48:35AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > Neal Becker writes:
> >
> >> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
> >
> > You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
> > put into Requires:?
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have acquired IPv6 addresses, eg:
> >
> > $ ip addr show eth0
> > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
> >
> > link/ether 00:e0
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
> LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
> IPv6 assigned prefix?
Yes, every system automatically chooses a link-local address.
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Neal Becker writes:
>
>> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
>
> You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
> put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll be
> expanded, and you
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:22:25AM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
> > This [1] may be of some help as a high level overview of how to deploy
> > IPv6 on a LAN and various operating system IPv6 compatibilities.
> > Fedora is doin
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:32:21AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
> > to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
> Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
Yeah. Bash-completion could stand to be broken up i
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
> default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't
> believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I
> still get
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:22:25AM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
> This [1] may be of some help as a high level overview of how to deploy
> IPv6 on a LAN and various operating system IPv6 compatibilities.
> Fedora is doing quite well! The document is not a configuration help,
> but it might make
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll be
expanded, and you can test its value. Bare-bones s
José Matos (jama...@fc.up.pt) said:
> My problem in a sense is that it is limited in scope. :-(
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin was the feature page
> for when the feature was initially deployed. The purpose of this is post is
> to
> raise awareness for this featur
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
> >
> > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and
On 06/02/2011 10:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>> +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
>> to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
>
> Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
+1 : Due to horrible p
Am 02.06.2011 16:36, schrieb seth vidal:
>> please leave me in peace with discussins how a word is used and where
>> i mean simply the ability to install a minimal-system without any
>> optional software and this is getting harder every month
>
> I don't disagree - but @base is not that group. @c
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2011, 16:02 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
> >
> > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > package-cleanup --leaves --all
>
> is listing "grub-0.97-66.fc14.x86_64"
> i hope you understand why i not trust this output :-)
grub isn't required.
> >> and then tell why the count of unneeded base-packages should be increased
On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
> to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Am 02.06.2011 16:15, schrieb seth vidal:
>> so PLEASE install a new fedora and remove anything not needed for
>> ssh, rsync, scp and tell me how long it takes to find all of them
>>
>> what you do with such a machine:
>> decide what services you will install on this bare setup or
>> using as it i
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:11 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 02.06.2011 16:04, schrieb drago01:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to hav
Am 02.06.2011 16:04, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>>>
>>> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
>>> my opinion it'
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
> >
> > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default
> install. In
> > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further imp
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>>
>> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
>> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, a
Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further impr
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:54:05PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect thin
On 06/01/2011 10:54 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further impr
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 23:54 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to f
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 07:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
> > have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
> > pretty nasty.
> >
>
> This should do it:
>
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
> have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
> pretty nasty.
>
This should do it:
rsync -az --progress -e ssh fedorapeople.org:/srv/repos/ /your/path
You
Hello, all:
Now rawhide buildtree sees rubygems 1.8.5. The license changed from
(Ruby or GPL+) to (Ruby or MIT).
If you see any issues with new rubygems please feel free to report them,
thank you.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> - Original Message -
> 4.20 is in rawhide since March 07. I will push it to f14/f15 also. Please
> file a bug next time
>
> thanks & regards
>
> Jaroslav
>
Thanks - I did file a bug and see that you replied to the bug too - so
thank
Compose started at Thu Jun 2 08:15:28 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Ron Yorston wrote:
> > I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
> > together.
>
> Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
> alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the safest be
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
Messaggio originale
Da: Peter Robinson
Inviato: 01/06/2011, 22:41
A: Development discussions related to Fedora
Oggetto: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, "Josef Bacik" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> > I will b
libmemcached 0.49, in rawhide, now provides:
libhashkit.so.1
libmemcached.so.7
libmemcachedprotocol.so.0
libmemcachedutil.so.2
You may also have to check new syntax for config, which could affect
some clients:
http://docs.libmemcached.org/libmemcached_exam
- Original Message -
> On 06/01/2011 09:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >
> > Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is
> > v4.10
> > which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20.
> >
> > Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the
>
95 matches
Mail list logo
