Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> said: > Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem > is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to > your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you > can nest directories which you can't do with LVM VGs. > > However the performance issue will be critical -- even 5% slower > really matters for VMs. But I hope btrfs can close this gap because > the filesystem design is really nice.
That was really my original point (that I didn't really state clearly I guess); btrfs performance with VM disk images should be compared against LVM VGs as well against ext4. -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
