On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:54:05PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647 > > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my > upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out. > > Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which > default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default > there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base. > admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really > an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin > activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base. > > Thoughts?
Why would you include an "optional functionality" (a quote from Packaging guidelines) package in the default installation? I personally don't use bash as my interactive shell and don't really like the idea of having more bash-related stuff than necessary in my system. -- # Petr Sabata
pgpVkkFXlUSao.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
