On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>
>>> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
>>> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
>>> schedule. There are dozens of new features including
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 03:19 PM +9:00:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
>>>
>>> Author: oget
>>>
>>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
>>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
>>
>> Author: oget
>>
>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> python-sexy.spec
>> Added Fi
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
> Author: oget
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
>
> Modified Files:
> python-sexy.spec
> Added Files:
> python-sexy-gdk-pixbuf.patch
> Log Message:
> * Wed Jul
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 25th July were
Manuel Wolfshant, Parag AN(पराग) and Thomas Spura.
Manuel Wolfshant : 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599638 perl-YAPE-Regex
ht
2010/7/28 Filipe Rosset :
>>
>
> We was delayed in F-12 (two weeks) and in F-13 (two weeks), probably
> we'll have a final version for Firefox 4 before or a bit after we
> release F-14. Another thing, we can test a lot and assist in upstream
> during our testing phase.
> It's +1 for me.
>
> --
> Fi
On Tue 27 July 2010 16:46:29 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 05:09 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > On 07/28/2010 12:49 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Non upstreamed patches are not a option for
> >>
> >> Firefox for trademark reasons as well.
> >
> > Non upstreamed patches are not an opt
Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
Many thanks to everyone who helped get us this far!
Jesse and I moved 931 builds [1] from dist-f14-py27-rebuild to dist-f14
about 45 minutes ago. If I'm reading the Koji logs correct [2] [3],
these packages are now available in the buildroot for F14, so furt
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Filipe Rosset wrote:
> Em 27-07-2010 18:53, Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> > schedule. There are dozens of new features incl
On 07/28/2010 05:09 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 12:49 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Non upstreamed patches are not a option for
>> Firefox for trademark reasons as well.
>
> Non upstreamed patches are not an option because it's a pain in the to
> have to update patches every few w
On 07/28/2010 05:01 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> what about iceweasel or icefox instead
>
> the trademark problem makes it non free
>
Fedora has a policy of not patching upstream software as much as
possible and trademark is only partially the reason and no, trademark
requirements do not make any
On 07/28/2010 12:49 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Non upstreamed patches are not a option for
> Firefox for trademark reasons as well.
Non upstreamed patches are not an option because it's a pain in the to
have to update patches every few weeks for a new FF release. We either
can do patches or t
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> On 7/27/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 07/28/2010 04:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > According to this two year-old post, it's possible to build Firefox
> > > with gstreamer support:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2008
On 7/27/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 04:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > According to this two year-old post, it's possible to build Firefox
> > with gstreamer support:
> >
> >
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2008/04/firefox-html5-video-with-gstreamer.html
> >
> >
> > Dunno if
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
>> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it
On 07/28/2010 04:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> According to this two year-old post, it's possible to build Firefox
> with gstreamer support:
>
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2008/04/firefox-html5-video-with-gstreamer.html
>
>
> Dunno if any of that is true today.
>
> There's precedent for Firefox
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 07/28/2010 03:33 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
Doesn't our version already support WebM?
Nope. We have updated Gstreamer and WebKit-Gtk in Fedora 13 and 12 for
WebM support bringing it to Epiphany and Midori users and I assume
Spot's Chromium repo users also have supp
Em 27-07-2010 18:53, Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> schedule. There are dozens of new features including WebM support that
> would be nice to have.
>
We
F11 or F12 had a beta version of firefox
spot's chromium builds do support webm, it works great :)
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 11:08 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundara
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Sadly, my name (for django-lint) is on the list. I've seen a rebuild of
> django-lint produced an error. Of course, fixed it, but the fix was not
> taken in account for the above list.
> What can I do to correct this situation, es
On 07/27/2010 11:08 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
>>> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
>
On 07/28/2010 03:38 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> -1 didn't the last time we started using a pre-release from Mozilla turn
> out pretty bad for us?
>
More specifics please. Which version of Firefox and what problems?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
I'm sure there'd be enough time to squeeze in FF4.0. Assuming there's
no development delays with Mozilla.
Regards
--
http://home.comcen.com.au/foxmulder881/signature/details.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/28/2010 03:33 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> Doesn't our version already support WebM?
>
Nope. We have updated Gstreamer and WebKit-Gtk in Fedora 13 and 12 for
WebM support bringing it to Epiphany and Midori users and I assume
Spot's Chromium repo users also have support for it but Firefox 4
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> > schedule. There are dozens of new features i
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> schedule. There are dozens of new features including WebM support that
> would be nice to have.
>
> Ra
Doesn't our version already support WebM?
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> schedule. There are dozens of new features includ
Hi,
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
schedule. There are dozens of new features including WebM support that
would be nice to have.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:39:55PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> > of those that it does open(),.. Is there seriously a use-case for someone
> > wanting
> > lvm partitioned /dev/ram disks ? or /dev/loop ?
>
> I would assume that's for testing.
point
> Do you have a list of packages which will need to be rebuilt? This is
> the last day before we branch, and with the dist-git outage there will
> be a short time to fix things before the Alpha freeze. Is anything in
> the critpath dependent upon boost, or in the primary spins?
here's the old l
Am 27.07.2010 03:27, schrieb David Malcolm:
> Current status: 114 failing builds
> http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html
>
> See also the notes on:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status
>
> Many of these appear to be pre-existing
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:34 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > > The 'not separating the scripts into a separate subpackage' bit.
> >
> > Ah. I thought the point of separating them wasn't to allow for multiple
> > init systems, but because our current
On 07/24/2010 01:09 PM, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
>> If we could swap out old C compilers for a more generic LLVM compiler
>> for core components like the kernel,
>
> Won't happen until clang generates much better code than GCC; in the
> meanwhile it'll have to grok all
The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current
release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144
Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mandatory, as SONAME
was bumped. Help from package maintainers with rebu
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> DeviceKit or udisks backend?
libudev / udisks / upower actually. The original DeviceKit is dead. The name
for the Solid backend stuck, it should probably be renamed.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 07:25 PM, M A Young wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> >> You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
> >
> > I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar 2010-07-27 13:39:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > More ever add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/26/10 5:05 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hey.
>
> The boost maintainers are planning to update the boost versions
> to the current release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. This is in keeping
> with the general plan to sync with boost every six mon
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> * avogadro
I'm taking this one because it's needed for kdeedu 4.5.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
--- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-07-27 13:24:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Checking test results on CPAN, results on
On 07/26/2010 07:25 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>
>> You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
>
> I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files
> into a new xen-licenses package (I don't what to include
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:55:17AM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The next sentence says, "/bin contains commands that may be used by both
> the system administrator and by users, but which are required when no
> other filesystems are mounted (e.g. in single user mode)." systemd
> qualifies on bot
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 10:30 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:27 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> > Over on mu...@lists.fp.org, we have some difficulty because by default a
> > reply to a list message doesn't automatically get sent back to the list.
> >
> > I find it really limiting i
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> Chen Lei (supercyp...@gmail.com) said:
> > have some patent issues. Are there any legal guys or developers who
> > are familiar with libva can help to clarify the patent issues in
> > libva?
> >
> > The Review Request is here and waits for a legal re
Chen Lei (supercyp...@gmail.com) said:
> have some patent issues. Are there any legal guys or developers who
> are familiar with libva can help to clarify the patent issues in
> libva?
>
> The Review Request is here and waits for a legal review for almost one year:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On 07/27/2010 09:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> Solid DeviceKit backend
>
> *
> ltinkl is working on dk backend, targetting Fedora 15 and KDE 4.6
>
> open
> discussion
>
DeviceKit or udisks backend?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 07/27/2010 08:50 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> 2010/7/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to sent Draft for packaging guidelines for review. There were
>> added some changes a long time ago and it would be nice to have it
>> official. If there won't be any comments, I'll sent it at the end
Hi all,
libva is a library and tools relating to the VAAPI video playback
acceleration specification.
libva is included in all major distributions(debian/ubuntu meego
opensuse mandriva gentoo etc.) . I need it as a dependecy to package
some meego MTF packages. Howerver, the submitter(Adam William
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics
that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this
email or add it to the related meeting
page.
-
-
= Weekly KDE Summar
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 10:16 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > libgpod
> Working on this
DONE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > The 'not separating the scripts into a separate subpackage' bit.
>
> Ah. I thought the point of separating them wasn't to allow for multiple
> init systems, but because our current guidance was to use sysvinit
> scripts by default, not upstart scrip
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:40:11 +0200, John Poelstra wrote:
> It's "reminder guy" again with a public service announcement about the
> upcoming Fedora 12 Alpha Release.
14
A simple one-line change for rpm-build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617166
is still not
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:11 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > seems like something that should be changed. readahead,
> > > > system-setup-keyboard and vpnc also have direct dependencies on upstart,
> > > > presumably because they (I think incorrec
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:05 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 10:48 AM, M A Young wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
> >>> abrt
> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >> CCApplet.cpp: In member function 'void CApplet::Disable(const char*)':
> >> CCAp
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > > seems like something that should be changed. readahead,
> > > system-setup-keyboard and vpnc also have direct dependencies on upstart,
> > > presumably because they (I think incorrectly) include upstart-style
> > > scripts in their main packages ra
On 07/27/2010 10:48 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
>
>>> abrt
>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> CCApplet.cpp: In member function 'void CApplet::Disable(const char*)':
>> CCApplet.cpp:364:72: error: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 4 of 'void
>>
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 10:48 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > %define with_upstart 1%{nil}
> > ...
> > if with_upstart
> > Requires: upstart >= 0.6.0
> > %else
> > Requires: SysVinit >= 2.85-38
> > %endif
> >
> > seems like something that should be ch
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> %define with_upstart 1%{nil}
> ...
> if with_upstart
> Requires: upstart >= 0.6.0
> %else
> Requires: SysVinit >= 2.85-38
> %endif
>
> seems like something that should be changed. readahead,
> system-setup-keyboard and vpnc also have direct dependenci
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
>> abrt
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> CCApplet.cpp: In member function 'void CApplet::Disable(const char*)':
> CCApplet.cpp:364:72: error: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 4 of 'void
> gdk_pixbuf_saturate_and_pixelate(const GdkPixbuf*,
David Malcolm wrote, at 07/27/2010 10:27 AM +9:00:
> Current status: 114 failing builds
> http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html
>
> See also the notes on:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status
>
> Many of these appear to be pre-e
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:33 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 00:27:32 +1000,
> David Timms wrote:
> >
> > I find it really limiting in a forum that is supposed to be enhancing
> > communication and collaboration to end up with most people replying only
> > to the original
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 00:27:32 +1000,
David Timms wrote:
>
> I find it really limiting in a forum that is supposed to be enhancing
> communication and collaboration to end up with most people replying only
> to the original author. I hope it isn't intended.
You also suggest people use reply
On 07/26/2010 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 11:32 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
>> On 07/25/2010 04:30 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> On 25/07/10 07:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
first it seems that systemd-sysvinit needs to add a:
Provides: sysvinit
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:27 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Over on mu...@lists.fp.org, we have some difficulty because by default a
> reply to a list message doesn't automatically get sent back to the list.
>
> I find it really limiting in a forum that is supposed to be enhancing
> communication and
Over on mu...@lists.fp.org, we have some difficulty because by default a
reply to a list message doesn't automatically get sent back to the list.
I find it really limiting in a forum that is supposed to be enhancing
communication and collaboration to end up with most people replying only
to the or
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 19:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Current status: 114 failing builds
> > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html
> >
> > See also the notes on:
> > https://fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 07:38:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Current status: 114 failing builds
> > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html
> >
> > See also the notes on:
> > https://fedoraproje
Compose started at Tue Jul 27 08:15:30 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ
2010/7/27 Matt McCutchen :
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:49 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> small addition:
>>
>> if you want to move stuff to /bin how about ifconfig and ip.
>
> I don't think so. ifconfig and ip administer the system-wide network
> interfaces. All the write operations require root pr
2010/7/27 Matt McCutchen :
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:42 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> i do not understand how a daemon (like e.g. dbus-daemon) qualifies as
>> "/bin : Essential user command binaries (for use by all users)" (taken
>> from fhs 2.3). one could argue if a daemon qualifies as "command
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:49 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> small addition:
>
> if you want to move stuff to /bin how about ifconfig and ip.
I don't think so. ifconfig and ip administer the system-wide network
interfaces. All the write operations require root privileges. The read
operations don't
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:42 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> i do not understand how a daemon (like e.g. dbus-daemon) qualifies as
> "/bin : Essential user command binaries (for use by all users)" (taken
> from fhs 2.3). one could argue if a daemon qualifies as "command".
> especially since it seems i
2010/7/27 Rudolf Kastl :
> 2010/7/27 Matt McCutchen :
>> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 10:31 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> >> On Sat,
2010/7/27 Matt McCutchen :
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 10:31 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:14:33AM -0400,
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 10:31 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:14:33AM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> Why is
75 matches
Mail list logo
