I've been thinking about how we might improve access to telemetry data. I don't
want to get too much into the issues with the current front-end, so suffice it
to say that it isn't meeting my group's needs.
I solicited ideas from Justin Lebar and Patrick McManus, and with those I came
up with an
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:16:50 AM UTC-6, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> Have we discussed this project with the metrics team yet?
When I started looking into this it wasn't clear to me that people really knew
what they wanted - they just knew why the existing system didn't work for them.
My
This is the discussion thread for the Mozilla Research blog post entitled
"Studying Lossy Image Compression Efficiency", and the related study.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Blog post is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2013/10/17/studying-lossy-image-compression-efficiency/
Study is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~josh/lossy_compressed_image_study_october_2013/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozi
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:50:12 PM UTC-5, cry...@free.fr wrote:
> Thank you for publishing this study, here are my first questions:
>
> - Why didn't you include JPEG 2000?
We couldn't test everything, we picked a small set of the formats that we hear
the most about and that seem interesti
This is the discussion thread for Mozilla's July 2014 Lossy Compressed Image
Formats Study and the Mozilla Research blog post entitled "Mozilla Advances
JPEG Encoding with mozjpeg 2.0".
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https:
Study is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~josh/lossy_compressed_image_study_july_2014/
Blog post is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2014/07/15/mozilla-advances-jpeg-encoding-with-mozjpeg-2-0/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.moz
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:15:13 PM UTC-5, perez@gmail.com wrote:
> #1 Would it be possible to have the same algorithm that is applied to webP to
> be applied to JPEG?
I'm not sure. WebP was created much later than JPEGs, so I'd think/hope they're
already using some equivalent to trellis q
> Are there any plans to integrate into other tools, specifically imagemagick?
>
> Or would you leave that up to others?
For now we're going to stay focused on improving compression in mozjpeg's
library. I think a larger improved toolchain for optimizing JPEGs would be
great, but it's probably
On Friday, July 18, 2014 10:05:19 AM UTC-5, j...@cloudflare.com wrote:
> I selected 10,000 random JPEGs that we were caching for customers and ran
> them through mozjpeg 2.0 via jpegtran. Some interesting facts:
With mozjpeg you probably want to re-encode with cjpeg rather than jpegtran. We
add
I was working on something for which TimeStamp and TimeDuration classes would
be helpful in simplifying code that deals with a cache expiration date. This
code does not require high-precision timing. In review I was told that
"TimeStamp shouldn't be used unless a hi-precision ms resolution is ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
