> Are there any plans to integrate into other tools, specifically imagemagick? > > Or would you leave that up to others?
For now we're going to stay focused on improving compression in mozjpeg's library. I think a larger improved toolchain for optimizing JPEGs would be great, but it's probably outside the scope of the mozjpeg project. > While you state that you now accept also jpeg for re-compression, this > usually involves loss of quality in the process. Options for improving re-compression are very limited if you're not willing to accept any quality loss. That said, our 'jpgcrush' feature does reduce size significantly for progressive JPEGs without harming quality. > Does mozjpeg have a preferred input format (for best quality/performance)? Not really. It's probably best to input JPEG if your source image is JPEG, otherwise I'd probably recommend converting to BMP for use with cjpeg. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
