On Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:50:12 PM UTC-5, cry...@free.fr wrote: > Thank you for publishing this study, here are my first questions: > > - Why didn't you include JPEG 2000?
We couldn't test everything, we picked a small set of the formats that we hear the most about and that seem interesting. We're not opposed to including JPEG 2000 in future testing, particularly if we see more evidence that it's competitive. > - The image set is some what biased toward outdoor photographic images and > highly contrasted artificial black and white ones, what about fractal > renderings, operating systems and 2D/3D games screen-shots, blurry, out of > frame or night shots? > > - I've found only two cats and not a single human face in the Tecnick image > set, no fancy à la Instagram filters, this can't be seriously representative > of web images, a larger image corpus would be welcome. We considered improving the image sets in some of the ways you suggest, we just didn't get to it this time. Trying to be thorough and accurate with these kinds of studies is more work that it seems like it'll be, we couldn't do everything. We'll try to do better with image sets in future work. I still think this set produces meaningful results. Thanks for the feedback. Maybe Tim, Gregory, or Jeff can respond to some of your other questions. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
